欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1900-1908.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202506.004

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

鹞落坪国家级自然保护区啮齿动物多样性的时空格局及其影响因素

钱泽胜1,2,周立志   

  1. 1安徽大学资源与环境工程学院, 合肥 230601; 2安徽省生物物种资源信息中心, 合肥 230601)
  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-06-06

Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of rodent diversity in the Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve.

QIAN Zesheng1,2, ZHOU Lizhi1,2*   

  1. (1School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China; 2Anhui Provincial Biodiversity Resources Information Center, Hefei 230601, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-06-06

摘要: 啮齿动物群落结构受环境影响,并对环境变化作出响应。为探究鹞落坪国家级自然保护区啮齿动物群落多样性的时空变化及其与环境因子的关系,本研究于2022年8月—2023年7月对该地区啮齿动物群落及其环境因子进行调查。通过α多样性和β多样性,进行趋势、外推、非度量多维尺度和聚类分析,探究不同季节和不同生境啮齿动物群落结构的差异。通过Mantel检验、冗余分析和方差分解分析,解析环境因子对啮齿动物群落结构的影响。结果表明:共调查到啮齿动物310只,分属1目2科5属7种;秋季物种多样性指数最高,空间上啮齿动物多样性呈“中峰模式”,灌丛、茶园和阔叶林生境多样性指数高于农田和针叶林生境;不同季节啮齿动物物种组成不存在显著差异(r=0.032, P>0.05),不同生境则存在极显著差异(r=0.464, P<0.01),阔叶林与针叶林生境群落和灌丛与茶林生境明显聚集;气温年较差、坡度、植被高度和人为干扰距离是影响啮齿动物群落结构变化的主要环境因子;能量、环境稳定性、生境异质性和人为干扰共解释了36.37%的啮齿动物群落变异,其中,生境异质性解释程度最高(28.71%)。本研究结果可为保护区啮齿动物群落多样性研究和管理策略制定提供参考。


关键词: 啮齿动物群落, 季节动态, 生境, 环境因子, 鹞落坪国家级自然保护区

Abstract: Rodent community structure is influenced by the environment and responds to environmental changes. To clarify the temporal and spatial variations of rodent diversity and its relationship with environmental factors in Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve, surveys on rodent communities were conducted in different seasons and habitats from August 2022 to July 2023. We examined differences in rodent community structures across different seasons and habitats using α and β diversity, trend extrapolation, non-metric multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis. The mantel test, redundancy analysis, and variance partitioning analysis were used to decipher the impacts of environmental factors on rodent community structure. A total of 310 rodents were trapped, belonging to one order, two families, five genera, and seven species. The species diversity was highest in autumn. Spatially, rodent diversity followed a “mid-peak pattern”. Diversity indices were higher in shrubbery, tea plantation, and broadleaved forests compared to farmlands and needleleaved forests. However, there were no significant differences in rodent species composition across different seasons (r=0.032, P>0.05), but significant differences across habitats (r=0.464, P<0.01), with two distinct clustering groups of broadleaved forests vs. needleleaved forests, and shrubs vs. tea plantations. The annual range of temperature difference, slope, vegetation height, and distance from human disturbance were the main environmental factors affecting the changes in rodent community structure. Energy, environmental stability, habitat heterogeneity and human disturbance together explained 36.37% of the variation in rodent community. Among them, habitat heterogeneity had the highest explanation degree (28.71%). Our results can provide a reference for the research and management strategy formulation of rodent community diversity in the reserve.


Key words: rodent community, season dynamics, habitat, environmental factor, Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve