欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1436-1447.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202505.020

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林常见树种树皮厚度的变异及其环境解释

王艳萍1,2,王斌2,3,陆芳2,3,陶旺兰2,3,李健星2,3,黄甫昭2,3,郭屹立2,3,向悟生2,3*,李先琨2,3
  

  1. 1广西师范大学生命科学学院, 广西桂林 541006; 2广西壮族自治区中国科学院广西植物研究所广西喀斯特植物保育与恢复生态学重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006; 3弄岗喀斯特生态系统广西野外科学观测研究站, 广西崇左 532499)

  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-05-08

Variations in bark thickness of common tree species in the karst seasonal rainforest of Nonggang and their environmental explanations.

WANG Yanping1,2, WANG Bin2,3, LU Fang2,3, TAO Wanglan2,3, LI Jianxing2,3, HUANG Fuzhao2,3, GUO Yili2,3, XIANG Wusheng2,3*, LI Xiankun2,3   

  1. (1College of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China; 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China; 3Nonggang Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Guangxi, Chongzuo 532499, Guangxi, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-05-08

摘要: 树皮由维管形成层以外的所有组织组成,其功能特性反映植物重要的生态适应策略。为揭示弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林常见树种树皮厚度在不同类群和功能群间的差异以及生物因子和环境因子对树皮厚度的影响,以弄岗15 hm2永久森林监测样地内多度大于20的128种常见树种为研究对象,分析不同类群和功能群之间树皮厚度的差异,以及生物因子和环境因子对树皮厚度的影响。结果发现:弄岗128种常见树种的树皮总厚度、外树皮厚度、内树皮厚度均值分别为2.95、0.70、2.26 mm;亚麻科(Linaceae)、紫葳科(Bignoniaceae)、茶茱萸科(Icacinaceae)的树皮相对较厚;树皮厚度在不同类群和功能群间均呈显著差异,且内树皮厚度>外树皮厚度;不同功能群中,落叶种>常绿种(外树皮厚度除外),乔木种>小乔木种>灌木种;树皮厚度的系统发育信号较弱,因此树皮厚度主要受生境因素影响;在影响树皮厚度的多种生物因子中,物种因子的解释率最高;此外,树皮厚度变异受地形因子和土壤因子驱动,不同群丛位置存在相似性,树皮总厚度与林分因子和环境因子均存在相关性。综上,弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林群落内树种的树皮厚度较薄,不同树种间和功能群间的树皮厚度存在较大差异,表明这些树种对当地湿润气候的适应性,环境因子对树皮厚度的解释揭示了树种通过调整树皮厚度来适应不同环境条件和生态位的策略。


关键词: 树皮总厚度, 内树皮厚度, 外树皮厚度, 季节性雨林, 生态位分化, 环境因子

Abstract: Bark is composed of all tissues outside vascular cambium, the functional characteristics of which reflect important ecological adaptation strategies of plants. To reveal the differences in bark thickness of common tree species in the karst seasonal rainforest among different taxonomic groups and functional groups, as well as the impacts of biological and environmental factors, 128 common tree species with an abundance greater than 20 in a 15 hm2 permanent monitoring plot of Nonggang were analyzed. The differences in bark thickness between different taxa and functional groups, as well as the impacts of biological and environmental factors on bark thickness were quantified. The results showed that the average total bark thickness, outer bark thickness, and inner bark thickness of the 128 tree species were 2.95, 0.70, and 2.26 mm, respectively. The bark of trees from Linaceae, Bignoniaceae, and Icacinaceae families was relatively thicker. The thickness of bark showed significant differences among different taxa and functional groups, with inner bark thickness > outer bark thickness. Among different functional groups, bark thickness was in order of: deciduous species > evergreen species (excluding outer bark thickness), and tree species > small tree species > shrub species. The phylogenetic signal for bark thickness was relatively weak, so bark thickness was primarily influenced by habitat factors. Among various biological factors affecting bark thickness, species identity had the highest explanatory power. Additionally, bark thickness variation was driven by topographical and soil factors, with similar patterns across different locations. Total bark thickness correlated with stand factors and environmental factors. In summary, bark thickness of tree species in the karst seasonal rainforest community in Nonggang is relatively thin, with significant variation among different tree species and functional groups. This indicates the adaptability of these tree species to the local humid climate. The explanation of bark thickness by environmental factors reveals the strategies employed by tree species to adapt to different environmental conditions and ecological niches by adjusting their bark thickness.


Key words: total thickness of bark, inner bark thickness, outer bark thickness, seasonal rainforest, niche differentiation, environmental factor