免耕及秸秆覆盖对春小麦-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202104.028

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1062-1072.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202104.028

免耕及秸秆覆盖对春小麦-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响

彭亚敏¹,武均^1,2,蔡立群^1,2,3*,齐鹏^1,2,3,张仁陟^1,2,3,罗珠珠^1,2,3

（¹甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院，兰州 730070； ²甘肃农业大学甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室，兰州 730070； ³甘肃省节水农业工程技术研究中心，兰州 730070）

出版日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2021-04-13

Effects of no-tillage and straw mulching on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in spring wheat and soil.

PENG Ya-min¹, WU Jun^1,2, CAI Li-qun^1,2,3*, QI Peng^1,2,3, ZHANG Ren-zhi^1,2,3, LUO Zhu-zhu1^,2,3

(¹College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; ²Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; ³Gansu Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Water Saving, Lanzhou 730070, China).

Online:2021-04-10 Published:2021-04-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究免耕及秸秆覆盖模式对春小麦土壤C、N、P生态化学计量特征的影响，为陇中黄土高原旱作农业区制定合理的农田管理措施提供参考依据。于2019年基于设置在安定区李家堡镇麻子川村的长期保护性耕作（传统耕作T、免耕+不覆盖NT、传统耕作+秸秆覆盖TS、免耕+秸秆覆盖NTS）定位实验，测定春小麦不同器官（籽粒、叶片、秸秆）和土壤的C、N、P元素含量。结果表明：相较于传统耕作处理（T），保护性耕作处理（NT、TS、NTS）显著提高了土壤C∶N、C∶P（P<0.01），土壤N∶P未显著提高（P>0.05），不同处理C∶N、C∶P变化顺序均为NTS>TS>NT>T；春小麦不同器官C∶N的顺序为秸秆>叶片>籽粒，C∶P的顺序为籽粒>叶片>秸秆；较T处理，保护性耕作处理显著降低了叶片C∶N、秸秆C∶N、秸秆C∶P；不同处理各器官N∶P的变化不显著（P>0.05）；该区春小麦的生长受N限制。春小麦与土壤的C、N、P元素内稳性整体表现为P>N>C，比值内稳性表现为C∶N>C∶P>N∶P，比值内稳性强于各元素内稳性。综合而言，NTS处理为最适合陇中黄土高原旱农区春小麦生长发育的耕作措施，研究区春小麦的生长容易受到N限制，应在NTS处理基础上适当增施氮肥，确保春小麦稳产增产。

关键词: 耕作措施, 春小麦, 土壤, 生态化学计量学, 内稳性

Abstract: To provide reference for formulating reasonable management measures in the dry farming area of Longzhong Loess Plateau, we explored the effects of no-tillage and straw mulching modes on carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorous (P) ecological stoichiometry in spring wheat and soil. Based on the long-term conservation tillage \[conventional tillage (T), notillage with no straw mulching (NT), conventional tillage with straw incorporation (TS), no-tillage with straw mulching (NTS)\] positioning experiment set in Mazichuan Village, Lijiabao Town, Anding District, we measured C, N, and P concentrations in different spring wheat organs (i.e., grain, leaf, straw) and soil in 2019. The results showed that compared with conventional tillage (T), conservation tillage treatments (NT, TS, and NTS) significantly increased soil C∶N and C∶P (P<0.01), but did not affect N∶P (P>0.05). The magnitude of C∶N and C∶P changes among different treatments was in the order of NTS>TS>NT>T. The order of C∶N for different organs of spring wheat was straw>leaf>grain, and the order of C∶P was grain>leaf>straw. Compared with T treatment, conservation tillage treatments significantly reduced leaf C∶N, straw C∶N and C∶P, whereas N∶P in each organ showed no variation among different treatments (P>0.05). The growth of spring wheat in this area was limited by N availability. The overall internal stability of C, N and P of spring wheat and the soil was P>N>C, the ratio internal stability was C∶N>C∶P>N∶P, and the internal stability of element ratio was stronger than that of each element. In short, NTS treatment is the most suitable farming measure for spring wheat growth and development in the dry farming area of the Longzhong Loess Plateau. The growth of spring wheat in this area is susceptible to N limitation. Nitrogen fertilizer application should be appropriately increased based on NTS treatment to ensure the growth of spring wheat.

Key words: tillage measure, spring wheat, soil, ecological stoichiometry, homeostasis.

彭亚敏, 武均, 蔡立群, 齐鹏, 张仁陟, 罗珠珠. 免耕及秸秆覆盖对春小麦-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4): 1062-1072.

PENG Ya-min, WU Jun, CAI Li-qun, QI Peng, ZHANG Ren-zhi, LUO Zhu-zhu. Effects of no-tillage and straw mulching on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in spring wheat and soil.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(4): 1062-1072.

[1]	孙龙, 胡春雨, 胡同欣. 计划火烧对红松人工林细根生物量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 362-371.
[2]	胡同欣, 丁海磊, 孙龙. 火干扰对森林土壤氮素循环与转化的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 372-382.
[3]	蔺兴武, 朱建国, 谢祖彬. 吉林蛟河不同演替阶段温带针阔混交林土壤质量演变 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 433-444.
[4]	张建彤, 马建涛, 柴雨葳, 吴炳权, 王彦萍, 韩凡香, 程宏波, 常磊, 柴守玺. 秸秆带状覆盖对旱地马铃薯土壤温度及产量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 461-468.
[5]	冯蒙蒙, 林永新, 贺子洋, 樊剑波, 贺纪正. 土壤含水量和氮添加对旱地红壤氨氧化微生物功能基因丰度的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 480-486.
[6]	郭晓宇, 程曼, 徐茂宏, 何新华, 文永莉. 不同坡向亚高山草甸土壤有机碳光降解特征及其对铁添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 33-40.
[7]	史嘉炜, 廖家强, 魏春雪, 彭逸飞, 李婷婷, 胡健, 汪金松, 周青平. 高寒草甸土壤呼吸及其组分对氮添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 41-49.
[8]	郭海宁, 刘美君, 杜盛. 降雨减少对刺槐树干液流特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 122-130.
[9]	邹佳何, 王海燕, 李成铭, 崔雪, 赵晗, 陈悦, 董齐琪, 侯文宁. 长白山北坡不同林分类型细根-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 170-177.
[10]	索炎炎, 张翔, 吴士文, 司贤宗, 李亮, 徐凤丹, 程培军, 李倩. 豫南夏花生种植区土壤pH时空演变及其驱动力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 188-196.
[11]	赵晗, 王海燕, 胡兴国, 雷相东, 杜雪, 邹佳何, 崔雪. 基于结构方程的云冷杉阔叶混交林土壤有机碳影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 264-272.
[12]	隋鹏祥, 廉宏利, 王峥宇, 姜英, 齐华, 罗洋, 郑金玉. 旋耕和秸秆还田方式对棕壤微生物群落特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2049-2060.
[13]	丁翊东, 李素丽, 张芸, 徐佳文, 吴盼盼, 毛瑢. 亚热带人工林不同植物生长型凋落叶溶解性有机质数量和光谱学特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2081-2090.
[14]	陈利军, 林涛, 娄振帅, 汤秋香, 蒋平安, 宝哲, 习斌, 靳拓. 不同灌溉定额下地膜残留量对土壤物理性质及棉花根系生长的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2121-2128.
[15]	包正荣, 戴皖宁, 苏旭, 陈义轩, 林利, 兰宇, 杨旭, 孟军. 九年低量生物炭还田和钾肥对棕壤土钾素、玉米产量和钾平衡的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2129-2137.

免耕及秸秆覆盖对春小麦-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响

Effects of no-tillage and straw mulching on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in spring wheat and soil.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价