欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 836-845.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

洮河流域云冷杉水源涵养林优势种群的年龄结构与数量动态

王逸飞1,陈国鹏1*,瓦锦明2,沈建波2,鲜骏仁3,万姣姣1,王之星1   

  1. 1甘肃农业大学林学院, 兰州 730070; 2甘肃洮河国家级自然保护区管护中心, 甘肃甘南 747600; 3四川农业大学环境学院, 成都 611130)

  • 出版日期:2026-03-10 发布日期:2026-09-01

Population age structure and quantitative dynamics of dominant species in spruce-fir water conservation forests in the Taohe River Basin, Northwest China.

WANG Yifei1, CHEN Guopeng1*, WA Jinming2, SHEN Jianbo2, XIAN Junren3, WAN Jiaojiao1, WANG Zhixing1   

  1. (1College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2Gansu Taohe National Nature Reserve Management and Protection Center, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Gannan 747600, Gansu, China; 3College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China).

  • Online:2026-03-10 Published:2026-09-01

摘要: 以洮河国家级自然保护区云冷杉林中的优势种群云杉(Picea asperata)、紫果云杉(P. purpurea)和岷江冷杉(Abies fargesii var. faxoniana)为对象,揭示种群现状并预测未来动态,为黄河上游水源涵养区云冷杉林的保护管理提供理论依据。综合运用种群结构多样性分析、存活曲线绘制、生存函数分析、Logistic模型拟合、种群数量动态分析以及潜在群落动态结构模拟等方法,解析种群年龄结构与动态特征。结果表明:云杉、紫果云杉和岷江冷杉种群年龄结构为“上小下大”的金字塔形,且种群数量动态指数均大于0,表明当前均为增长型种群;紫果云杉和岷江冷杉种群在生长过程中对外部干扰的缓冲能力较弱;基于个体数量和基面积计算,当下云杉种群具有最大环境容纳量和最大增长速率,占据绝对优势地位,而紫果云杉与岷江冷杉种群的增长潜力大于云杉种群;现有群落和所有潜在群落均呈增长型结构,其中当前混合群落的增长性最低、潜在紫果云杉单优群落的增长性最高。当前群落中,3种优势种群特性和增长性差异使各种群面临一定的生存风险,并可能影响后续群落演替方向。因此,建议采取适当的人工干预措施,优化种群结构,以增强其对未来外部干扰的抵御能力。


关键词: 云冷杉林, 生存分析, 种群优势度增长, 群落结构, 多样性指数

Abstract: We examined the current status and predicted future dynamics of the populations of Picea asperata, P. purpurea, and Abies fargesii var. faxoniana in the spruce-fir forests in the Taohe National Nature Reserve, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the conservation and management of spruce-fir forests in water source conservation areas of the upper reaches of the Yellow River. We employed population structure diversity analysis, survival curve construction, survival function analysis, Logistic model fitting, population dynamic analysis, and potential community dynamic structure simulation to elucidate age structure and dynamic characteristics of these populations. Results showed that the age structures of P. asperata, P. purpurea, and A. fargesii var. faxoniana populations exhibited a pyramid shape, characterized by smaller at the top and larger at the bottom. All the examined populations had positive growth indices greater than zero, indicating they were currently growing populations. P. purpurea and A. fargesii var. faxoniana populations showed relatively weak buffering capacity against disturbances during their growth. Based on calculations involving individual numbers and basal area, we found that P. asperata population possessed both maximum environmental carrying capacity and maximum growth rate while occupying an absolute dominant position currently. Both P. purpurea and A. fargesii var. faxoniana populations demonstrated greater growth potential than P. asperata population. All existing communities as well as simulated potential communities displayed a growing structural pattern. The mixed communities exhibited the lowest growth rates while potential single-species communities dominated by P. purpurea showed the highest growth rates. Differences in characteristics and growth rates among three dominant species within current communities pose certain survival risks, and may affect the succession direction. Appropriate artificial intervention measures should be implemented to optimize population structures, which would help enhance resilience against future external disturbances.


Key words: spruce-fir forest, survival analysis, population dominance growth, community structure, diversity index