欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 2013-2022.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202606.007

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

微塑料和纳米塑料对淡水生物膜微生物群落结构和功能的影响

夏彩徽1,曾金2,张雪娇2*   

  1. 1沈阳化工大学环境与安全工程学院, 沈阳 110142; 2 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016)

  • 出版日期:2026-06-10 发布日期:2026-12-01

Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on the structure and function of microbial community in freshwater biofilms.

XIA Caihui1, ZENG Jin2, ZHANG Xuejiao2*   

  1. (1School of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China; 2Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China).

  • Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-12-01

摘要: 微塑料(MPs)和纳米塑料(NPs)进入淡水环境中,与淡水生物膜发生相互作用并影响生物膜的生态系统过程。目前,有关MPs和NPs对淡水生物膜微生物群落的影响研究鲜有报道。本研究采集太湖湖水,基于微宇宙实验和宏基因组学技术,采用不同浓度(1 mg·L-1、10 mg·L-1)和粒径(1 μm:MPs;100 nm:NPs)的聚苯乙烯塑料,暴露于实验室培养的淡水生物膜,以探究其对生物膜微生物群落结构和功能的影响。结果表明:淡水生物膜微生物群落的优势菌门主要为变形菌门、拟杆菌门、放线菌门、浮霉菌门和疣微菌门等;MPs_1和NPs_1均降低了变形菌门的相对丰度,且MPs_1的影响更显著;MPs_10和NPs_10均降低了浮霉菌门和疣微菌门的相对丰度;MPs和NPs均显著降低了红育菌属、食酸菌属等降解功能菌的相对丰度,但促进假单胞菌属等耐受菌属的富集;NPs_1增加了拟杆菌门和放线菌门的相对丰度,体现出浓度与粒径的差异化效应;MPs和NPs均增加了群落丰富度,降低了Shannon和Simpson多样性,这种变化取决于浓度与粒径,较大的粒径和较高的浓度会导致更显著的变化,同时也改变了生物膜微生物群落结构,且MPs的影响强于NPs,体现粒径效应;功能分析发现,MPs和NPs均降低了氨基酸、碳水化合物代谢等功能基因的相对丰度,可能干扰淡水生态系统中微生物介导的碳和氮循环过程,进而影响其生态功能。


关键词: 微塑料, 纳米塑料, 淡水生物膜, 宏基因组, 群落结构, 多样性, 功能分析

Abstract: Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) entering freshwater environments interact with freshwater biofilms, potentially impacting ecosystem processes. There are few reports on the effects of MPs and NPs on the microbial community of freshwater biofilms. In this study, water from Lake Taihu was collected. Based on the microcosm experiment and metagenome technology, polystyrene plastics with different concentrations (1 mg·L-1, 10 mg·L-1) and particle sizes (1 μm: MPs; 100 nm: NPs) were exposed to freshwater biofilms cultured in the laboratory to explore its effects on the structure and function of biofilms microbial community. The results showed that the dominant phyla of microbial community in freshwater biofilm were mainly Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetota, and Verrucomicrobiota. Both MPs_1 and NPs_1 decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, and the effect of MPs_1 was more significant. Both MPs_10 and NPs_10 decreased the relative abundance of Planctomycetota and Verrucomicrobiota. Both MPs and NPs significantly decreased the relative abundance of degrading functional bacteria such as Rhodoferax and Acidovorax, but promoted the abundance of tolerant bacteria such as Pseudomonas. NPs_1 increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidota and Actinobacteria, reflecting the differential effect of concentration and particle size. Both MPs and NPs increased community richness and decreased Shannon and Simpson diversity. Such impacts depended on both concentration and particle size, with larger particle sizes and higher concentrations leading to more significant changes. Moreover, they altered the biofilm microbial community structure, and the effect of MPs was stronger than that of NPs, reflecting the particle size effect. Function analysis revealed that MPs and NPs reduced the relative abundance of functional genes for amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, which may interfere with microbial-mediated carbon and nitrogen cycling processes in freshwater ecosystems, thereby affecting ecological functions.


Key words: microplastics, nanoplastics, freshwater biofilm, metagenome, community structure, diversity, function analysis