欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1186-1196.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202305.024

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于最优尺度的鄂西南山区景观生态风险时空变化特征

左岍1,2,周勇1,2*,李晴1,2,王丽1,2,刘婧仪1,2,何楠1,2


  

  1. 1华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430079; 2华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 武汉 430079)

  • 出版日期:2023-05-10 发布日期:2023-05-05

Spatial and temporal variations of landscape ecological risk in the mountainous region of southwestern Hubei Province based on the optimal scale.#br#
#br#

ZUO Qian1,2, ZHOU Yong1,2*, LI Qing1,2, WANG Li1,2, LIU Jingyi1,2, HE Nan1,2#br#

#br#
  

  1. (1Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China; 2College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China).

  • Online:2023-05-10 Published:2023-05-05

摘要: 探究景观生态风险对优化生态脆弱山区景观格局和加强生态管理具有重要意义。利用鄂西南山区多期土地利用数据,构建基于景观格局指数的生态风险评估模型,采用地统计、空间自相关和地学信息图谱等方法,探究最优尺度下山区景观生态风险的时空分异规律与变化趋势。结果表明:鄂西南山区景观生态风险分析最适宜尺度为50 m栅格和4 km网格;1990—2018年,鄂西南山区景观类型结构稳定性较强,以林地、耕地和草地为主,其中建设用地面积增量最大且持续扩张,并且以耕地的转出和生态用地之间的相互转换为主;景观生态风险整体呈下降趋势,等级以低、较低风险水平为主,局部高风险和低风险区存在交错分布现象,景观生态风险等级面积变动也多为相邻等级间的转移;山区景观生态风险空间分布表现为显著正相关,主要以高值、低值集聚模式为主,风险空间集聚效应明显,局部空间自相关模式变化不大,空间分布稳定性较强;提出鄂西南山区景观生态风险防范与生态环境保护建议,为山区生态安全保障决策制定提供数据基础和理论支持。


关键词: 尺度效应, 景观格局, 景观生态风险, 时空演变, 鄂西南山区

Abstract: Investigation of landscape ecological risks is essential for optimizing landscape patterns and strengthening ecological management in ecologically fragile mountainous areas. Using multi-period land use data in the mountainous area of southwestern Hubei Province, we constructed an ecological risk assessment model based on landscape pattern index. We explored the spatial and temporal patterns and trends of mountain landscape ecological risks at optimal scales using methods such as geostatistics, spatial autocorrelation, and geoinformation mapping. The results showed that the most suitable scales for landscape ecological risk analysis in the mountainous area of southwestern Hubei Province were 50 m grain and 4 km grid. From 1990 to 2018, the structure of landscape types in the study area was more stable, mainly composed of forestland, cultivated land, and grassland. The area of construction land increased the most and continued to expand. The transfer-out of cultivated land and the interconversion between ecological lands were the main factors. The overall landscape ecological risk showed a downward trend, with the grades being mainly at  low and very low risk. There were interlacing distribution phenomenon between local high risk and low risk areas. The change of landscape ecological risk area mainly was the transfer between adjacent grades. The spatial distribution of landscape ecological risk in mountainous area showed significant positive correlation, mainly with high-value and low-value clustering patterns. The risk spatial clustering effect was substantial. The local spatial autocorrelation pattern did not change much, with strong stability of spatial distribution. Finally, we proposed suggestions for landscape ecological risk prevention and ecological environmental protection in the mountainous area of southwestern Hubei Province. This study provides data basis and theoretical support for decision-making on ecological security in mountainous areas.


Key words: scale effect, landscape pattern, landscape ecological risk, spatial and temporal evolution, the mountainous area of southwestern Hubei Province.