基于土地利用变化的西宁市景观生态风险识别及优化策略

doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202307.013

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2020-2031.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202307.013

基于土地利用变化的西宁市景观生态风险识别及优化策略

乔斌^1,2,3,颜玉倩^2,3,张婷华⁴,李秀阳⁵,张睿^2,3,李晓东^2,3,李甫^2,3,李素雲^2,3,祝存兄^2,3,周秉荣^2,3*

（¹兰州大学资源环境学院/冰川与沙漠研究中心，兰州 730000； ²青海省气象科学研究所，西宁 810001； ³青海省防灾减灾重点实验室，西宁 810001； ⁴西宁市气象局，西宁 810016； ⁵青海省信息中心，西宁 810008）

出版日期:2023-08-10 发布日期:2023-07-27

Landscape ecological risk identification and optimization strategy in Xining City based on land use change.

QIAO Bin^1,2,3, YAN Yuqian^2,3, ZHANG Tinghua⁴, LI Xiuyang⁵, ZHANG Rui^2,3, LI Xiaodong^2,3, LI Fu^2,3, LI Suyun^2,3, ZHU Cunxiong^2,3, ZHOU Bingrong^2,3*#br#

#br#

(¹College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Center for Glacier and Desert Research, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; ²Qinghai Province Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Xining 810001, China; ³Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Qinghai Province, Xining 810001, China; ⁴Xining Meteorological Bureau, Xining 810016, China; ⁵Information Center of Qinghai Province, Xining 810008, China).

Online:2023-08-10 Published:2023-07-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 景观生态风险评价作为国土资源空间优化配置与生态资源管理决策设计的综合手段，为区域生态安全定量化评估提供了新思路。本研究分析了1980—2020年西宁市土地利用时空演变特征以及景观生态风险时空分异特征。结果表明：（1）草地占西宁市总面积的51%以上，以中/低覆盖度草地为主，1980—2020年耕地面积减少97.42 km²，建设用地增加103.89 km²。（2）2000年以前土地利用结构相对稳定，2000年以来土地利用变化程度活跃。40年间耕地转出面积最大，为109.69 km²，建设用地转入面积最大，为104.44 km²。（3）5个时期西宁市景观生态风险指数均在0.288左右，景观生态安全状况总体稳定，景观生态风险等级以低生态风险等级和较低生态风险等级为主，占西宁市面积的70%以上。（4）5个时期西宁市景观生态风险全局Moran’s I值分别是0.712、0.720、0.724、0.741、0.764，呈现以低-低聚集和高-高聚集为主的空间分布格局，空间自相关程度逐渐增加，空间趋同趋势不断增强。土地资源优化配置路径包括：科学估算土地利用结构中生产、生活、生态用地的规模阈值，避免生产、生活用地过度开发利用挤占生态空间，修复和改善草地、耕地资源质量，强化和提升林地资源生态功能和价值溢出效益，合理规划建设用地开发规模和强度，培育水域、建设用地景观生态廊道，适度增加建城区生态用地规模，可以保障西宁市生态安全格局健康稳定。

关键词: 土地利用变化, 生态风险指数, 景观格局, 空间自相关, 西宁市

Abstract: Landscape ecological risk assessment is a comprehensive means for the spatial optimization allocation of land resources and the decision-making design of ecological resources management, which can provide a new idea for quantitative assessment of regional ecological security. We analyzed the characteristics of the temporal and spatial variations of land use in Xining City from 1980 to 2020, and explored the characteristics of the temporal and spatial variations of landscape ecological risks. The results showed that: (1) Grassland accounted for more than 51% of the total area of Xining City, mainly with medium/low coverage grassland. From 1980 to 2020, the area of cultivated land decreased by 97.42 km², while the construction land increased by 103.89 km². (2) The land use structure was relatively stable before 2000, and the degree of land use change was active after 2000. During the four decades, the area of transferred from cultivated land was the largest at 109.69 km², while the area transferred into construction land was the largest at 104.44 km². (3) The landscape ecological risk index of Xining City was 0.288, and the landscape ecological security status was generally stable. The ecological risk levels were mainly at low and the relatively low ecological risks, accounting for more than 70% of Xining’s area. (4) The global Moran’s I values of Xining’s landscape ecological risk in the five periods were 0.712, 0.720, 0.724, 0.741, 0.764 respectively, with a spatial distribution pattern being dominated by low-low and high-high clusters. The degree of spatial autocorrelation increased gradually, and the trend of spatial convergence strengthened continuously. The paths of optimal allocation of land resources include: scientifically estimating the scale threshold of production, living, and ecological lands in the land use structure, avoiding excessive development and utilization of production and living land and occupying ecological space, improving the quality of grassland and arable land resources, and strengthening the overflow benefits of ecological functions and values of woodland resources, rational planning of the scale and intensity of construction land development, cultivating landscape ecological corridors of waters and construction land, and moderately increasing the area of ecological land in the urban area. Such suggestions may ensure the continued improvement of ecological security pattern in Xining City.

Key words: land use change, ecological risk index, landscape pattern, spatial autocorrelation, Xining City.

乔斌, 颜玉倩, 张婷华, 李秀阳, 张睿, 李晓东, 李甫, 李素雲, 祝存兄, 周秉荣. 基于土地利用变化的西宁市景观生态风险识别及优化策略[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 2020-2031.

QIAO Bin, YAN Yuqian, ZHANG Tinghua, LI Xiuyang, ZHANG Rui, LI Xiaodong, LI Fu, LI Suyun, ZHU Cunxiong, ZHOU Bingrong. Landscape ecological risk identification and optimization strategy in Xining City based on land use change.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(8): 2020-2031.

[1]	胡露, 冯彬, 白文科, 董鑫, 肖强, 张晋东, 黄尤优, 周材权. 四川大熊猫保护地生境质量时空演变特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2204-2211.
[2]	许英杰, 杨绍微, 张峻铭, 孙永玉, 杨秀彪, 欧朝蓉. 云南金沙江干热河谷县域土地利用景观格局的地形效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1982-1992.
[3]	左岍, 周勇, 李晴, 王丽, 刘婧仪, 何楠. 基于最优尺度的鄂西南山区景观生态风险时空变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1186-1196.
[4]	朱小华, 杨倩, 丁子筱, 李传荣, 唐伶俐, 陈宾宾. 荒漠草原生态系统景观格局变化及其对气候的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 748-758.
[5]	师青霞, 张亚平, 徐斌. 基于MCCA多情景模拟的浙北地区景观稳定性时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 445-453.
[6]	奥勇, 王周航, 赵永华, 蒋嶺峰, 张梦娜. 不同城市化水平下绿地景观要素对温度的影响——以关中平原城市群为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(11): 2721-2729.
[7]	刘玉佳, 彭建, 李刚勇, 韩万强, 刘亮, 关靖云, 巨喜峰, 郑江华. 基于GEE的库鲁斯台草原生态环境评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(11): 2776-2785.
[8]	何钊全, 尚雪, 张铜会, 云建英. 近20年陕北黄土丘陵区景观生态风险时空变化及其冷热点格局 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2514-2525.
[9]	陈心曲, 丁忠义, 杨俊, 陈晓东, 陈媚楠. 沛北矿城复合区景观生态风险评价及驱动力分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1796-1803.
[10]	郭彦君, 郭文炯. “三生空间”视角下山西中部盆地城市群景观生态风险分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1813-1824.
[11]	苗纯萍, 何欢, 陈玮, 胡远满, 刘淼. 城市绿地三维建筑格局对大气污染物的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1628-1634.
[12]	李姣, 汪杰, 李朗, 周翠烟, 牛潜, 张灿明. 洞庭湖生态经济区土地利用变化对碳储量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1156-1165.
[13]	冯朝晖, 李宣瑾, 胡健, 王凌青. 基于景观格局的青藏高原东部典型区生态安全分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1188-1196.
[14]	解若璠, 沈永明, 劳桦. 基于人为干扰度的盐城滨海湿地景观格局动态变化及响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(2): 351-360.
[15]	贺宏斌, 孙然好, 段兴武. 城市景观影响人居环境健康的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(2): 361-370.

基于土地利用变化的西宁市景观生态风险识别及优化策略

Landscape ecological risk identification and optimization strategy in Xining City based on land use change.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价