欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1175-1185.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202305.022

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

长三角中心区生境质量时空变化及其影响机制

陈实1,2,金云翔2,黄银兰1*   

  1. 1池州学院地理与规划学院, 池州学院自然资源遥感应用研究中心, 安徽池州 247000; 2中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081)

  • 出版日期:2023-05-10 发布日期:2023-05-05

Spatio-temporal variations of habitat quality and its underlying mechanism in the central region of Yangtze River Delta.

CHEN Shi1,2, JIN Yunxiang2, HUANG Yinlan1*   

  1. (1School of Geography and Planning, Application Research Center of Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, Chizhou University, Chizhou 247000, Anhui, China; 2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China).

  • Online:2023-05-10 Published:2023-05-05

摘要: 明晰快速城市化发展背景下生境质量时空变化特征及其影响机制,对区域生态保护修复和一体化高质量可持续发展具有重要的意义。以长三角中心区为研究区,基于1995—2020年土地利用空间数据,运用InVEST模型评估生境质量空间格局,探究生境质量时空变化特征,并揭示其影响机制。结果表明:在时间变化上长三角中心区生境质量呈现下降态势,省(市)域尺度上的差异性逐渐加强,生境质量等级以较差和差的面积变化为主,优、良好和一般等级的面积变化不大;生境质量等级空间变化上,体现为较差与差、优、良好等级之间的相互转移,南京、常州、镇江等城市的生境质量等级向差与向好转移幅度的均衡性较好,宣城、池州、舟山、安庆等城市的恢复潜力较强;在省(市)尺度近5年的生境质量管理和改善上,浙江省效果远好于其他省(市),省(市)间生境质量管理和改善的差异化,凸显出未来长三角中心区跨区域生态环境一体化管理和发展的重要性;自然环境和社会经济发展因素是影响长三角中心区生境质量时空差异化发展的重要原因,高程和坡度决定了生境质量的空间格局,人类活动强度驱动着生境质量格局变化。


关键词: 生境质量, InVEST模型, 地理探测器, 驱动因子, 长三角

Abstract: Clarifying the spatial and temporal variations of habitat quality and its driving factors is important for regional ecological protection and restoration and integrated high-quality sustainable development under rapid urbanization. Based on the satellite-based land-use dataset from 1995 to 2020, we used the InVEST model to detect the spatio-temporal variations of habitat quality in the central region of the Yangtze River Delta, and assessed its driving force. Habitat quality in the central region of the Yangtze River Delta showed a trend of degradation. Heterogeneity across provinces (municipalities) increased mainly because of the increases of habitat area with poor and worst grades and little area change in other grades. The spatial changes of habitat quality mainly happened in the  exchange between poor grade and worst grade, better grade, best grade. There was a good balance between the area of habitat with upgraded quality and degraded quality in Nanjing, Changzhou, and Zhenjiang cities, and more potential for habitat restoration in Xuancheng, Chizhou, Zhoushan, and Anqing cities. The habitat management and improvement in Zhejiang Province were better than other provinces (municipalities) in the recent five years. The differences in habitat quality management and improvement between provinces (municipalities) highlight the importance of integrated management and development of ecological environment in this area in the future. The natural environment and social-economic development are the main reasons for the spatio-temporal variations of habitat quality in this area. Elevation and slope determined habitat quality, while the intensity of human activities drove the changes in habitat quality pattern.


Key words: habitat quality, InVEST model, geographical detector, driving factor, the Yangtze River Delta.