欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2738-2746.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.017

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

新安江流域旅游与生态系统服务权衡与协同及影响因素

郭贝贝1,2*,邹娴1,鲍捷1,2   

  1. 1安徽大学商学院, 合肥 230601; 2安徽大学旅游规划研究中心, 合肥 230601)

  • 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-19

Trade-offs and synergies between tourism and ecosystem services and their influencing factors in  Xin’an River Basin.

GUO Beibei1,2*, ZOU Xian1, BAO Jie1,2   

  1. (1School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China; 2Tourism Planning Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-19

摘要: 深入了解旅游目的地中对生态系统服务的时空格局所产生影响的社会及自然因素,对于实现旅游目的地可持续管理以及保护环境具有重要意义。本研究以新安江流域为案例地,基于Pearson相关系数法对新安江流域生态系统服务的空间分布格局进行定量探究,引入地理探测器识别影响生态系统服务空间分布的驱动因素,剖析其空间差异与旅游目的地发展二者之间的内在逻辑联系。结果表明:(1)总体上,新安江流域的土壤保持量为0~713.97 t·hm-2·a-1,产水量为286.93~2060.29 mm,生境质量平均值为0.81,碳储量为2.3~106.55 t·hm-2,旅游文化价值为0~5922元·hm-2。(2)新安江流域产水量高值区主要集中于黄山山脉和南部丘陵处,低值区位于太平湖以及新安江。黄山山脉、黄山市南部以及黄山市与杭州市交界处为土壤保持的高值区,低值区位于流域中部和东部。碳储量和生境质量除了黄山风景区、屯溪区、徽州区等中部地区以及新安江数值较低外,其他区域集聚明显。旅游文化的高值区主要分布在新安江等水域,耕地区最低。(3)新安江流域5种生态系统服务之间的关系以协同为主,仅旅游文化与碳储存、土壤保持、水源供给之间以及水源供给与生境质量之间存在权衡关系。旅游文化与水源供给之间的权衡程度最显著,旅游文化与生境质量之间的协同程度最突出。(4)自然因素是影响新安江流域5种生态系统服务的主导因素,但社会因素对生态系统服务的影响也不容小觑。


关键词: 自然旅游, 生态系统服务, 权衡与协同, 驱动因素, 新安江流域

Abstract: Understanding the social and natural factors that affect the spatial and temporal patterns of ecosystem services in tourist destinations is important for achieving sustainable management and environmental protection. We quantitatively investigated the spatial distribution of ecosystem services in the Xin’an River Basin using the Pearson correlation coefficient method. Geographic probes were introduced to identify the driving factors affecting the spatial distribution of ecosystem services and analyze the intrinsic logic between spatial differences and the development of tourist destinations. The results showed that: (1) Soil conservation in the Xin’an River Basin maintained at 0-713.97 t·hm-2. Water yield was 286.93-2060.29 mm. Average habitat quality was 0.81. Carbon storage was 2.3-106.55 t·hm-2. Tourism culture was 0-5922 yuan·hm-2. (2) The areas with high water yield in the Xin’an River Basin were mainly concentrated in the Huangshan Mountain and the southern hills regions. The areas with low water production value were located around Taiping Lake and the Xin’an River. The areas with high value for soil conservation were found in the Huangshan Mountains, the southern part of Huangshan City, and the border between Huangshan City and Hangzhou City. Low-value areas were mainly found in the central and eastern parts of the basin. Except for the central regions (including the Huangshan Scenic Area, Tunxi District, and Huizhou District) and the Xin’an River, carbon stock and habitat quality showed obvious clustering in other areas. High-value areas for tourism culture were mainly distributed along the Xin’an River and other water bodies, while cultivated land areas had the lowest values. (3) The relationships among the five ecosystem services in the Xin’an River Basin were primarily synergistic. There were trade-off relationships between tourism culture and carbon storage, soil conservation, water supply, as well as between water supply and habitat quality. The most significant trade-off was found between tourism and water supply, while the most prominent synergy was between tourism and habitat quality. (4) Natural factors were the dominant factors influencing the five types of ecosystem services in the Xin’an River Basin, but the impacts of social factors on ecosystem services should not be underestimated.


Key words: nature-based tourism, ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergies, driving forcing, Xin’an River Basin