欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1789-1799.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202606.010

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同土地利用方式下土壤表面电化学性质及其影响因素

刘均阳1,周正朝2*,苏雪萌3,林卫东1   

  1. 1延安大学生命科学学院, 陕西延安 716000; 2陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院, 西安 710119; 3陕西理工大学人文学院, 陕西汉中 723001)

  • 出版日期:2026-06-10 发布日期:2026-12-01

Surface electrochemical properties of soils and the influencing factors under different land use types.

LIU Junyang1, ZHOU Zhengchao2*, SU Xuemeng3, LIN Weidong1   

  1. (1School of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, Shaanxi, China; 2School of Geographical Sciences and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China; 3College of Humanities, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, Shaanxi, China).

  • Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-12-01

摘要: 土地利用方式对土壤表面电化学性质的影响,直接关系到养分吸附、污染物迁移、团聚体稳定性等关键土壤功能的发挥。为明确不同土地利用方式下土壤表面电化学性质及其影响因素,以黄土高原的乔木林、灌木林、草地、撂荒地和农田为研究对象,采用联合测定法对土壤表面电化学性质进行测定。结果表明,研究区的土壤表面电荷数量、表面电势、表面电荷密度、比表面积和表面电场分别为6.52~11.44 cmol c·kg-1、-157.26~-104.12 mV、0.17~1.36 C·m-2、19.30~144.72 m2·g-1和2.35×108~19.14×108 V·m-1。乔木林土壤表面电势、表面电荷密度和表面电场显著低于农田,而乔木林土壤表面电荷数量和比表面积显著高于撂荒地和农田(P<0.05)。根系特征和土壤理化性质对土壤表面电化学性质变异的独立贡献率分别为25.2%和44.8%,二者的交互作用贡献率为26.9%。根系特征中根长密度是影响土壤表面电化学性质的主要因素,变异贡献率为87.1%,土壤理化性质中土壤黏粒和有机质含量是影响土壤表面电化学性质的主要因素,变异贡献率分别为83.2%和11.1%。土壤物理和化学性质是影响土壤表面电化学性质的显著路径,路径系数分别为-0.82和-0.83,且以直接效应为主。因此,黄土高原土壤表面电化学性质在不同土地利用方式下差异显著,且受植物根系和土壤理化性质的共同影响。此结果可加深对黄土高原地区土壤表面电化学性质的认识,对该区域的土壤管理与调控、生态效益评价等具有重要意义。


关键词: 土地利用方式, 植物根系, 土壤表面电化学性质, 黄土高原

Abstract: Changes in land use patterns have marked effects on soil surface electrochemical properties, which are directly related to key soil functions such as nutrient absorption, pollutant migration, and soil aggregate stability. We examined surface electrochemical properties of soils and the influencing factors across five typical land use types on the Loess Plateau, including forest, shrubbery, grassland, abandoned land, and farmland. A combination of methods was used to measure soil surface electrochemical properties. The results showed that soil surface charge quantity, surface potential, surface charge density, specific surface area, and surface electric field across in the five land use types ranged from 6.52 to 11.44 cmol c·kg-1, -157.26 to -104.12 mV, 0.17 to 1.36 C·m-2, 19.30 to 144.72 m2·g-1, and 2.35×108 to 19.14×108 V·m-1, respectively. Soil surface potential, surface charge density, and surface electric field in forests were significantly lower than those in farmland, while soil surface charge quantity and specific surface area in forests were significantly higher than those in abandoned land and farmland (P<0.05). The independent contribution rates of root characteristics and soil physicochemical properties to the variations of soil surface electrochemical properties were 25.2% and 44.8%, respectively, and the relative contribution of their interaction was 26.9%. Among all the root characteristics, root length density was the major factor influencing soil surface electrochemical properties, with a contribution rate of 87.1%. In terms of soil physicochemical properties, clay and organic matter contents were the primary factors influencing soil surface electrochemical properties, with contribution rates of 83.2% and 11.1%, respectively. Soil physical and chemical properties significantly influenced soil surface electrochemical properties, with path coefficients of -0.82 and -0.83, respectively, and the direct effects being dominant. In conclusion, soil surface electrochemical properties on the Loess Plateau differed significantly with land use types, and were regulated jointly by roots and soil physicochemical properties. Our results enhance the understanding of soil surface electrochemical properties on the Loess Plateau and provide theoretical support for soil management and regulation as well as for the assessments of ecological benefits.


Key words: land use type, root system, soil surface electrochemical property, Loess Plateau