欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3746-3755.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202511.008

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态脆弱区辽西北彰武县农户家庭环境经济代谢分析

徐月萍1,2,3,刘晔1,4,李宏庆5,刚爽6,薛冰1,3,任婉侠1,3*   

  1. 1中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016; 2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049; 3污染土壤生物物化协同修复技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 沈阳 110016; 4辽宁师范大学生命科学学院, 辽宁大连 116029; 5柏林工业大学循环经济与回收技术系, 德国柏林 10623; 6沈阳大学碳中和技术与政策研究所, 沈阳 110044)

  • 出版日期:2025-11-10 发布日期:2025-11-12

Analysis of environmental and economic metabolism of rural households in ecologically fragile areas: A case study of Zhangwu County, Northwest Liaoning Province.

XU Yueping1,2,3, LIU Ye1,4, LI Hongqing5, GANG Shuang6, XUE Bing1,3, REN Wanxia1,3*   

  1. (1Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Contaminated Soil Remediation by Bio-physicochemical Synergistic Process, Shenyang 110016, China; 4School of Life Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China; 5Chair of Circular Economy and Recycling Technology, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin 10623, Germany; 6Institute of Carbon Neutrality Technology and Policy, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China).

  • Online:2025-11-10 Published:2025-11-12

摘要: 开展生态脆弱区农户环境经济代谢研究对于乡村精准治理和区域可持续发展具有重要意义。作为我国典型生态脆弱区和北方重要生态安全屏障的辽西北地区,其生态环境质量改善与农牧民生计提升对东北地区乡村振兴至关重要。本文以辽西北地区风沙危害最严重的彰武县北部7个乡镇为研究区,采用问卷调研与半结构式访谈等方法,基于家庭尺度环境经济代谢框架,对该地区以碳排放和水资源消耗为核心表征的典型农户家庭环境经济代谢活动进行研究。结果表明:辽西北北部地区乡村户均水资源消耗量和用水强度分别为14105 m3和0.14 m3·元-1,户均碳排放量和碳强度分别为36.72 t CO2·a-1和0.31 kg CO2·元-1,人均碳排放量达9.90 t CO2·a-1;以种植、养殖和种养结合为主的家庭水资源消耗量、碳排放量及其强度均存在较大差异,其中,种植主导型家庭水资源消耗量和用水强度均最高,养殖主导型家庭碳排放量最高,而种养结合型碳排放强度最大,但三种类型家庭环境经济代谢特征均表现为“高耗水高碳排”;家庭生计模式不同是造成环境经济代谢水平存在差异的主要原因,其中,养殖主导型家庭单位收入环境经济代谢效率相对较佳。未来应采取更加切实可行的策略加快引导辽西北地区乡村向低碳、绿色、循环的可持续发展模式进行转型,以实现乡村振兴。


关键词: 环境经济代谢, 碳排放, 用水强度, 农户家庭, 物质流分析

Abstract: Study on the environmental-economic metabolism of rural households in ecologically fragile areas is of great significance for rural precise governance and regional sustainable development. Northwest Liaoning Province is a typical ecologically fragile area and an important ecological security barrier in northern China. Improving the ecological environment quality and enhancing the livelihood of farmers and herders are crucial for revitalizing rural areas in Northeast China. We chose seven townships in the northern part of Zhangwu County, which is seriously affected by wind erosion in the Northwest Liaoning Province, as the study area. Using methods such as questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews, and based on a framework of family-scale environmental and economic metabolism, we investigated the environmental and economic metabolism activities of typical farmer households in the region, characterized by carbon emissions and water resource consumption. The results showed that in the northern region of Northwest Liaoning, the average household water consumption and use intensity were 14105 m3 and 0.14 m3·yuan-1, respectively. The average household carbon emissions and carbon intensity were 36.72 t CO2·a-1 and 0.31 kg CO2·yuan-1, respectively, with the per capita carbon emissions reaching 9.90 t CO2·a-1. There were great differences in water consumption, carbon emissions, and their respective intensities across households dominated by planting, breeding, and combined planting and breeding. The planting-dominated households exhibited the highest water consumption and intensity. The breeding-dominated households showed the highest carbon emissions. The planting-breeding combined households displayed the highest carbon emission intensity. However, the environmental-economic metabolic characteristics of the three types of households showed “high water consumption and high carbon emission”. The differing livelihood strategies were the primary reasons for the difference of environmental economic metabolism level. Notably, the breeding-dominated households demonstrated relatively higher environmental-economic metabolism efficiency per unit of income. In the future, more  feasible strategies should focus on accelerating the transition of rural areas into low-carbon, green and circular sustainable development models to achieve rural revitalization.

Key words: environmental-economic metabolism, carbon emission, water intensity, rural household, material flow analysis