欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 479-486.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202202.036

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

秸秆还田方式对不同土壤条件下玉米苗期生长发育的影响  

王帅,朱涵宇,杨占惠,姜籽竹,陶雨朝,刘昌壮,Jan M FAHEEM,李明*   

  1. (东北农业大学农学院, 哈尔滨 150030)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-10 发布日期:2022-03-07

Effects of straw returning modes on maize seedling growth under different soil conditions.

WANG Shuai, ZHU Han-yu, YANG Zhan-hui, JIANG Zi-zhu, TAO Yu-zhao, LIU Chang-zhuang, Jan M FAHEEM, LI Ming*   

  1. (Agricultural College, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China).
  • Online:2022-03-10 Published:2022-03-07

摘要: 为探究不同秸秆还田方式对玉米苗期生长影响的生态生理机制,本试验选择3种土壤类型(黑土、黄土、酸土),设置2个还田方式(秸秆覆盖还田、秸秆混拌还田),以及黑土条件下2种石子处理方式(石子覆盖处理、石子混拌处理),比较处理间苗期地上部、地下部形态以及抗逆性生理指标的变化。结果表明:秸秆还田显著增加了玉米苗期株高、叶面积、干物质重、叶绿素荧光参数、根系长度、根系表面积、根尖数以及根系活跃吸收面积,其中秸秆混拌处理优于秸秆覆盖处理;秸秆还田降低了超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶活性和丙二醛含量,其中覆盖处理好于混拌处理;尽管黄土与黑土、酸土间肥力具有差异,但秸秆还田效果相同;两种石子处理均抑制根系的生长,在覆盖处理或混拌处理方式下秸秆还田处理均显著好于石子处理,因此,秸秆还田主要通过改变土壤生物化学性质促进根系生长和养分吸收,进而促进地上部的生长。

关键词: 玉米, 秸秆覆盖, 秸秆混拌, 石子覆盖, 石子混拌

Abstract: To explore the ecophysiological mechanism underlying the effects of straw returning on maize seedling growth, three types of soils (black soil, loess and acid soil) were selected, two methods of straw returning to the field (straw mulching and straw mixing) and two stone treatments (stone covering and stone mixing) in black soil were set up. The morphological changes of aboveground and belowground parts and the physiological indices of stress resistance under different treatments were compared. The results showed that straw returning significantly increased plant height, leaf area, dry matter weight, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, root length, root surface area, root tip number, and active absorption area of roots at seedling stage. The straw mixing treatment performed better than straw mulching treatment. Straw returning decreased superoxide dismutase and catalase activities and malondialdehyde content, with mulching treatment performing better than mixing treatment. Although the fertility of loess was different from that of black soil and acid soil, the effects of straw returning were the same. Both stone treatments inhibited root growth. Straw returning treatments (either mulching or mixing) performed better than stone treatments. Therefore, straw returning promoted root growth and nutrient absorption mainly by changing soil biochemical properties, and thus enhanced the growth of aboveground parts.

Key words: maize, straw mulching, straw mixing, stone covering, stone mixing.