欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 300-306.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202201.029

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江支流堵河鱼类群落结构及多样性

孟子豪,李学梅,王旭歌,胡飞飞,朱挺兵,吴兴兵,朱永久,陈康,杨德国*   

  1. (中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所, 农业农村部淡水鱼类种质资源与生物技术重点实验室, 武汉 430223)
  • 出版日期:2022-02-10 发布日期:2022-08-10

Fish community structure and diversity in Duhe River, a tributary of Hanjiang River.

MENG Zi-hao, LI Xue-mei, WANG Xu-ge, HU Fei-fei, ZHU Ting-bing, WU Xing-bing, ZHU Yong-jiu, CHEN Kang, YANG De-guo*   

  1. (Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences; Key Laboratory of Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Wuhan 430223, China).
  • Online:2022-02-10 Published:2022-08-10

摘要: 基于堵河2018年6月—2019年5月渔获物,分析了鱼类群落组成及变化、优势种以及群落多样性时空分布特征,讨论了外界环境扰动作用对鱼类群落结构和生物多样性的影响。结果表明:调查期间共采集鱼类38种,分属4目8科,其中鲤形目鱼类最多(26种),占总种数的68.4%。群落优势种为鳙(Aristichthys nobilis)、马口鱼(Opsariichthys bidens)、〖FK(W*8/9。1〗〖PS5号F体.eps,BP#〗〖FK)〗
Hemiculter leucusculus);生态类型主要以杂食性、底层性、定居性鱼类为主,分别占总物种数的50.0%、50.0%和89.5%;渔获物的相对重量以鲢(Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)、鳙为主,分别占总重量的49.8%、16.6%,相对数量以马口鱼、〖FK(W*8/9。1〗〖PS5号F体.eps,BP#〗〖FK)〗、宽鳍鱲(Zacco platypus)为主,分别占总数的30.0%、17.4%、12.7%;鱼类群落的多样性指数处于一般至较丰富水平,其中中游S3区域Shannon指数(H)、Maragalef指数(R)和Pielou指数(J)均高于上游S1、S2和下游S4区域,夏季和秋季的HR指数均高于春冬季,但J指数为春冬季高于夏秋季;不同采样时间的鱼类群落相似性指数(S′)均介于0.50~0.75,为中等相似及以上,不同采样区域的S′除S1与S3间和S1与S4间为中等不相似外,其余均为中等相似(S′>0.50);ABC曲线表现为生物量曲线在丰度曲线上方,W统计为0.0267>0,表明现阶段堵河水系鱼类群落受外界扰动影响较小,鱼类群落较为稳定,但与历史数据相比,鱼类种类和生态类型均有一定变化。根据上述结果提出了堵河鱼类资源的保护建议。

关键词: 堵河, 鱼类, 群落结构, 生物多样性

Abstract: Based on the surveys of fish resources from June 2018 to May 2019, we analyzed fish community structure and species diversity in the Duhe River, and investigated the effects of environmental disturbance on fish community structure. Results showed that 38 species from 8 families and 4 orders were recorded, with cyprinids having most species (26), accounting for 68.4% of the total species captured during the investigation. Aristichthys nobilis, Opsariichthys bidens,and Hemiculter leucusculus were the dominant species in the river. Omnivorous, bottom, and settlement fish were mainly ecological types, accounting for 50.0%, 50.0%, and 89.5%, respectively. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and A. nobilis accounted for 49.8% and 16.6% by relative weight and O. bidens,H. leucusculus, Zacco platypus accounted for 30.0%, 17.4%, and 12.7% by relative individual number, respectively. The fish community diversity indices were at the moderate or rich level. The Shannon index (H), Margalef index (R) and Pielou index (J) of the S3 region in the middle stream were higher than that of S1 and S2 regions in the upstream and S4 region in the downstream. The H and R of summer and autumn were higher than those of spring and winter, while the J of spring and winter was higher than that of summer and autumn. The community similarity (S′) indices among seasons were between 0.50 and 0.75, indicating moderately similar or higher. The community similarity (S′) indices of different two regions were moderately similar (S′>0.50), except that between S1 and S3 regions and between S3 and S4 regions, which were moderately dissimilar. The abundance-biomass curve (ABC) showed that biomass curve was above on abundance curve and W statistic was positive (0.0267>0), which indicated that fish community of Duhe River was relatively stable and was less affected by disturbance. However, compared with the historical data, fish species and ecological types have been changed. Accordingly, we proposed suggestions for the protection of fish resources in the Duhe River.

Key words: Duhe River, fish, community structure, biodiversity.