欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 1557-1566.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202106.019

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

马尾松林生物量估算系数及其影响因子

袁锋1,2,陈灿1,2*,夏心慧1,2,刘贺娜1,2,李茂瑾3,吴承祯4   

  1. 1福建农林大学林学院, 福州 350002; 2森林生态系统过程与经营福建省高校重点实验室, 福州 350002;3福建省惠安赤湖国有防护林场, 福建惠安 362100;4武夷学院生态与资源工程学院, 福建南平 354300)
  • 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-12-10

Coefficients and influencing factors of biomass estimation of Masson pine forest.

YUAN Feng1,2, CHEN Can1,2*, XIA Xin-hui1,2, LIU He-na1,2, LI Mao-jin3, WU Cheng-zhen4   

  1. (1College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 2Collegiate Key Lab of ForestEcosystem Process and Management in Fujian, Fuzhou 350002, China; 3Fujian Chihu Stateowned Forest Shelter Farm, Huian 362100, Fujian, China; 4College of Ecology and Resource Engineering, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, Fujian, China).
  • Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-12-10

摘要: 收集整理1982—2019年马尾松林生物量文献数据,分析了包括生物量换算系数(BCEF)、生物量扩展系数(BEF)和根茎比(R)在内的马尾松林生物量估算系数及其影响因子,以期为准确估算马尾松林生物量提供科学依据。结果表明:BCEF、BEF和R的平均值分别为0.723±0.138 t·m-3、1.390±0.184和0.167±0.024,地域之间存在差异;BCEF、BEF和R均随着林龄(r2=0.329, 0.430, 0.315)和林分蓄积量(r2=0.513, 0.528, 0.337)的增加而逐渐减小,并逐渐趋于稳定;BCEF、BEF和R均随着平均树高的增大先降低后增加,拟合精度分别为0.370、0.506和0.239;BCEF随着平均胸径的增大逐渐减小(r2=0.306);BEF随着平均胸径增大先降低后增加(r2=0.531);生物量估算系数与气候因子均无明显关系;R随着坡度(r2=0.298),BCEF随着海拔(r2=0.365)的增加先降后增。R随着海拔(r2=0.277)的增加逐渐增大。马尾松生长过程中自然整枝使林分结构产生差异,坡度和海拔对光照、热量和水分产生影响,进而影响植物生长,从而林分结构和地形因子与生物量估算系数拟合度较高,在应用生物量估算系数估算马尾松生物量时应综合考虑林分结构和地形因素的影响。

关键词: 马尾松, 生物量估算系数, 林分结构, 气候, 地形

Abstract: To accurately estimate Masson pine forest biomass in China, we analyzed the estimation coefficients including the biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), the biomass expansion factor (BEF), and the ratio of root to stem (R) with their influencing factors based on the data from related literature from 1982 to 2019. The results showed that the average values of BCEF, BEF and R were 0.723±0.138 t·m-3, 1.390±0.184 and 0.167±0.024, respectively. BCEF, BEF and R all gradually decreased with increasing stand age (r2=0.329, 0.430 and 0.315, respectively) and stand stock volume (r2=0.513, 0.528 and 0.337, respectively), and gradually tended to be stable. BCEF, BEF and R all decreased first and then increased with increasing average tree height, with a fitting accuracy of 0.370, 0.506 and 0.239, respectively. BCEF decreased gradually with increasing average  diameter at breast height (r2=0.306). BEF decreased first and then increased with increasing average diameter at breast height (r2=0.531). There was no relationship between biomass estimation coefficients and climatic factors. R increased with slope (r2=0.298) and increased gradually with altitude (r2=0.277), while BCEF decreased first and then increased with altitude (r2=0.365). Natural pruning during the growth of Masson pine resulted in different stand structure. The slope and altitude would affect plant growth by affecting the availability of light, heat, and water. Hence, the stand structure and topographic factors had a higher degree of fitting with the biomass estimation coefficients. Therefore, the role of stand structure and topography should be considered when estimating the biomass of Masson pine by using biomass estimation coefficients.

Key words: Masson pine, biomass estimation coefficient, forest stand structure, climate, topography.