岷江上游黑水河流域不同景观结构小流域径流系数的比较

生态学杂志

岷江上游黑水河流域不同景观结构小流域径流系数的比较

许申来^1,2,3;李秀珍¹;胡远满¹;何兴元¹;周昊⁴

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所，沈阳 110016；²中国科学院生态环境中心城市与区域国家重点实验室, 北京 100085；³中国科学院研究生院，北京 100039；⁴沈阳农业大学林学院，沈阳 110161

收稿日期:2006-08-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-05-08 发布日期:2007-05-08

Comparison of runoff coefficient of watersheds with different landscape structure in Heishui River basin of Minjiang River upper reach.

XU Shen-lai^1,2,3;LI Xiu-zhen¹;HU Yuan-man¹;HE Xing-yuan¹;ZHOU Hao⁴

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;²State Key Laboratory of Urban and Region Ecology, Research Center For Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; ³Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China; ⁴College of Forestry, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China

Received:2006-08-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-05-08 Published:2007-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在GIS技术支持下，结合岷江上游黑水河流域1988—2002年多年平均降水量和蒸散量空间分布，对不同景观结构的小流域多年平均径流系数进行比较。结果表明：不同土地覆盖类型组合流域多年平均径流系数大小关系依次为林灌流域<林灌草复合流域<森林流域<林草流域，这与流域土地利用类型、流域海拔分布和迎风坡向分布特征有关;对于森林流域和灌木流域,其多年平均径流系数主要受多年平均降水量、多年平均蒸散量和平均坡度共同影响；对于林草流域和林灌草复合流域，其多年平均径流系数主要受流域的多年平均降水量、多年平均蒸散量和多林草面积比共同影响。

关键词: 模拟酸雨, 可溶性糖, 含N量, 光合速率, 硝酸还原酶

Abstract: By using the 1988—2002 data of annual mean precipitation and evapotranspiration in the Heishui River basin of Minjiang River upper reach, and with the help of GIS, a comparison was made on the annual mean runoff coefficient of the watersheds with different landscape structure in the Heishui River basin. The results showed that the magnitude of the annual mean runoff coefficient was in the sequence of forest-shrub watershed<forest-grass-shrub watershed<forest watershed<forest-grass watershed, which was related to the land cover type, mean altitude and windward slope direction. For forest watershed and shrub watershed, the annual mean runoff coefficient was affected by mean annual precipitation, mean annual evapotranspiration and mean slope grade. For forest-grass and forest-grass-shrub watersheds, the annual mean coefficient was affected by mean annual precipitation , mean annual evapotranspiration, and the ratio of forest/grass area.

Key words: Simulated acid rain, Soluble sugar, Nitrogen content, Photosynthetic rate, Nitrate reductase

许申来;李秀珍;胡远满;何兴元;周昊. 岷江上游黑水河流域不同景观结构小流域径流系数的比较[J]. 生态学杂志.

XU Shen-lai^1,2,3;LI Xiu-zhen¹;HU Yuan-man¹;HE Xing-yuan¹;ZHOU Hao⁴. Comparison of runoff coefficient of watersheds with different landscape structure in Heishui River basin of Minjiang River upper reach.[J]. cje.

[1]	章异平, 师志强, 竹磊, 焦会景, 王淳秋, 武靖, 徐军亮. 秦岭东段不同海拔栓皮栎粗根非结构性碳水化合物含量的季节动态 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3): 712-720.
[2]	王兴萌,陈志豪,李永春,吴家森,李永夫,钟斌,梁辰飞,徐秋芳. 氮素形态及配比对毛竹和青冈实生苗生长特性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2655-2661.
[3]	左官强,王诗雅,冯乃杰,王新欣,牟保民,郑殿峰. 烯效唑对淹水胁迫下大豆光合生理及表型的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2702-2708.
[4]	王树源,王明浩,牛颖芝,何斐,赵长明. 七种云杉针叶非结构性碳与光合特性随物候期的动态变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(8): 2283-2290.
[5]	马文宝,廖成云,姬慧娟,陈雪,董廷发. 濒危连香树种群性比和雌雄株功能性状的差异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(8): 2414-2419.
[6]	谭代军,熊康宁,张俞,杭红涛,全明英,季传泽,马学威,张仕豪. 喀斯特石漠化地区不同退化程度花椒光合日动态及其与环境因子的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(7): 2057-2064.
[7]	王凯,林婷婷,吕林有,刘建华,黄舒漫. 水分胁迫对杨树幼苗非结构性碳水化合物分配的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 3283-3290.
[8]	苏文会,曾宪礼,范少辉,倪慧菁. 带状采伐对毛竹非结构性碳与生物量分配的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10): 2934-2940.
[9]	侍瑞,苏培玺,周紫鹃,解婷婷. 三种不同类型草甸生态系统下鹅绒委陵菜的光合特性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(7): 1943-1951.
[10]	姚文秀,赵成章,陈静,王建良,李群,张伟涛. 张掖湿地旱柳冠层内垂直层次光截获与叶片光合生理特性的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1334-1340.
[11]	铁军,王霞,刘倍贝. 濒危植物南方红豆杉冠层结构对其净光合速率的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 967-973.
[12]	俞芹,王倩颖,刘志高,张明如,张寿洲,申亚梅. 光强与水分处理下景宁木兰光合光响应模型拟合比较 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(3): 898-905.
[13]	崔之益,徐大平,杨曾奖,张宁南,刘小金,洪舟. 土壤含水量对旱季降香黄檀树干呼吸和非结构性碳水化合物的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2): 374-382.
[14]	周立国1,5,宋清海1,张一平1,3*,费学海1,5,邓云1,2,武传胜1,3,5,周瑞伍1,5,林友兴1,5,邓晓保1,2,陈爱国1,4,李培广1,4. 4种森林生态系统光合作用光响应参数特征的比较 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(7): 1815-1824.
[15]	唐星林1,2,曹永慧1,2,周本智1,2,周燕3,顾连宏4. 不同CO₂浓度下苦槠（Castanopsis sclerophylla*）叶片光合光响应模型模拟比较 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(7): 2060-2067.