欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 919-924.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202205.021

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

露天煤矿排土场不同植被恢复模式土壤养分和酶活性的差异性

李晗1,吕刚1*,李叶鑫2,程昊天1,刘禹鑫1     

  1. 1辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院, 辽宁阜新 123000;2沈阳工业大学建筑与土木工程学院, 辽宁沈阳 110870)
  • 出版日期:2022-05-10 发布日期:2022-10-10

The differences of soil nutrients and enzyme activities of different vegetation restoration models in opencast coal mine dump.

LI Han1, LYUGang1*, LI Ye-xin2, Cheng Hao-tian1, Liu Yu-xin1   

  1. (1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China; 2School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China).
  • Online:2022-05-10 Published:2022-10-10

摘要: 为明晰露天矿排土场不同植被恢复模式下土壤改良效果,以阜新海州露天矿排土场刺槐林、榆树林、混交林、灌木林、荒草地土壤为研究对象,分析不同植被恢复模式下土壤养分含量及酶活性特征。结果表明:不同植被恢复模式土壤养分含量随土层的加深整体呈下降趋势,均存在明显的表聚性;5种植被恢复模式土壤蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶、脲酶活性峰值均出现在0~10 cm土层,与其他土层差异显著,土壤蛋白酶活性峰值分布在0~30 cm土层;土壤养分含量与土壤酶活性显著相关。主成分分析结果显示,刺槐林、榆树林、混交林、灌木林和荒草地的主成分综合得分依次为2.94、1.68、4.44、-2.66、-6.39,植被恢复效果表现为混交林>刺槐林>榆树林>灌木林>荒草地,表土层恢复效果最佳,随着土层加深效果逐渐下降。混交林地可作为该排土场的主要植被恢复模式。

 

关键词: 排土场, 植被恢复, 养分, 酶活性, 综合评价

Abstract: To explore soil improvement under different restoration modes of open-pit mine dumps, we analyzed the characteristias of soil nutrient contents and enzyme activities under different vegetation restoration modes (Robinia pseudoacaciaforest, elm forest, mixed forest, shrubland, and abandoned grassland) in Haizhou openpit mine of Fuxin. The results showed that soil nutrient content in all vegetation restoration modes decreased with soil depth, with obvious surface aggregation. The activities of sucrase, catalase, and urease in all the five vegetation restoration modes peaked in the 0-10 cm soil layer, which was significantly different from the other soil layers. Soil protease activities peaked in the 0-30 cm soil layer. Soil nutrient contents were significantly correlated with soil enzyme activity. The results of principal component analysis showed that the principal component comprehensive scores of Robinia pseudoacacia forest, elm forest, mixed forest, shrubland and abandoned grassland were 2.94, 1.68, 4.44, -2.66, and -6.39, respectively. The overall performance of vegetation restoration effect was mixed forest > Robinia pseudoacacia forest > elm forest > shrubland > abandoned grassland. The shallow soil layer had the best restoration effect, with the effect gradually decreasing with soil depth. The mixed forest could be used as the main revegetation mode in this dump site.

Key words: dump site, vegetation restoration, soil nutrient, enzyme activity, comprehensive evaluation.