欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 580-588.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202201.001

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化

胡秀芳1,2,赵军1*,王蓓3,高超4   

  1. (1西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070; 2南通大学地理科学学院, 江苏南通 226007; 3兰州大学资源环境学院, 兰州 730000; 4西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712199)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-10 发布日期:2022-03-11

Changes of spatial synergies or trade-offs of ecosystem services in Heihe River Basin.

HU Xiu-fang1,2, ZHAO Jun1*, WANG Bei3, GAO Chao4     

  1. (1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2College of Geography, Nantong University, Nantong 226007, Jiangsu, China; 3College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 4College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712199, Shaanxi, China).
  • Online:2022-03-10 Published:2022-03-11

摘要: 黑河流域是西北地区重要的生态功能区,流域内生态系统服务变化对当地社会经济发展和流域生态安全具有重要影响,其社会生态环境问题一直受到高度关注,因此开展黑河流域生态系统服务评估及协同/权衡关系研究对该区域的可持续发展具有重要意义。本文采用基于时间序列的双变量逐像元相关分析,对黑河流域1990—2015年的各项关键生态系统服务进行定量评估,并对服务之间的空间协同/权衡关系进行分析。结果表明:(1)全流域整体以协同关系为主。两两服务之间协同与权衡地区的面积比,协同>权衡的有19对:在产水、水源涵养、土壤保持、水质净化(N保持和P保持)、碳储存之间;协同=权衡的有6对:食物供给-产水/水源涵养/土壤保持、生物多样性-产水/水源涵养/P保持;权衡>协同有2对:生物多样性-土壤保持/N保持。(2)黑河流域生态系统服务的协同/权衡关系分布存在明显的区域差异性。30%的区域不存在协同与权衡关系;空间分布南北差异很大,南部协同/权衡明显,协同或权衡区呈东南-西北的长条状分布;北部没有明显的协同/权衡关系,协同或权衡区域呈多点零星分散分布;协同与权衡区域絮状交错分布,集聚性低。

关键词: 黑河流域, 生态系统服务, 空间协同与权衡

Abstract: Heihe River Basin is an area with important ecofunction. Changes of ecosystem services in this area greatly impact local socioeconomic development and ecological security. The society-ecology-environment problems have been highly concerned. Therefore, it is of great significance to examine the changes of ecosystem services and the synergies and trade-offs between them. In this study, ecosystem services and related synergies/trade-offs from 1990 to 2015 were quantitatively analyzed by the bivariate pixel by pixel correlation analysis based on time series. The results showed that there were synergies between ecosystem services at the whole region in the Heihe River Basin. There were 19 pairs of ecosystem services with synergy > trade-off: relationship between water yield, water conservation, soil conservation, N retention, P retention and carbon storage; 6 pairs with synergy = trade-off: food supply-water yield/water conservation/soil conservation, biodiversity maintenancewater yield/water conservation/P retention; 2 pairs with synergy < trade-off: biodiversity maintenance soil conservation/N retention. There were obvious regional variations in the synergy/trade-off relationship of ecosystem services. There was no synergy/trade-off relationship in 30% of the region. The spatial distribution of synergy/trade-off relationship varied greatly from north to south. The synergy/trade-off relationship was obvious in the south, being a long strip from southeast to northwest. By contrast, the synergy/trade-off relationship was not obvious in the north, the synergy/tradeoff areas were scattered in many points, flocculent and staggered, with low agglomeration.

Key words: Heihe River Basin, ecosystem services, spatial synergy or trade-off.