欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 1643-1652.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202206.009

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于旗舰物种的生态系统文化服务供需及流研究——以大熊猫国家公园为例

陶思宇,周忠学*   

  1. (陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院, 西安 710119)
  • 出版日期:2022-08-10 发布日期:2022-08-16

The supply, demand, and flow of ecosystem cultural services based on flagship species: Case of the Giant Panda National Park, China.

TAO Si-yu, ZHOU Zhong-xue*   

  1. (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China).
  • Online:2022-08-10 Published:2022-08-16

摘要: 旗舰物种的象征意义体现了环境与文化之间的联系,有利于增强地区文化认同。探讨旗舰物种文化服务的供需空间关系对特殊生态系统保护、文化景观规划和可持续发展具有重要意义。本文以大熊猫为对象,选取大熊猫的网络关注度和企业使用量(命名或作为标识)作为测度其文化服务潜在需求和已实现需求的代用指标,识别并分析了大熊猫文化服务的供给区和需求区及其分布特征;并基于主成分分析法探究了文化服务流的影响因素和形成机制。结果表明:大熊猫文化服务供给区为大熊猫国家公园,分布集中仅占全国面积的0.3%,四川为主要供给区,受种群数量和交通可达性限制,供给区的供给能力较低;大熊猫文化服务需求区及服务流路径均具空间异质性,分布在四川以东地区,潜在服务流路径比已实现服务流路径多,公众对大熊猫的网络关注多于使用标识;大熊猫文化服务供需在空间分布上极不匹配,主要受人口分布与迁移、经济发展和政策条件的影响。


关键词: 旗舰物种, 生态系统服务供需, 文化服务流, 大熊猫国家公园

Abstract: The symbolic significance of flagship species reflects the relationship between environment and culture, which is conducive to enhancing regional cultural identity. Clarifying the spatial relationship between supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services of flagship species is of great significance for the protection of special ecosystems, cultural landscape planning, and sustainable development. In this study, we selected the network attention and enterprise usage (named or marked) of giant panda as indices to measure its potential and realized demand for cultural ecosystem services, identified the supply and demand areas of giant panda cultural ecosystem services, and analyzed their features of distribution. We also explored the influencing factors and the mechanism underlying the forming of cultural ecosystem service flow using principal component analysis. The results showed that the Giant Panda National Park was the giant panda cultural ecosystem services supply area, which only accounted for 0.3% of total area of China. The main supply area was in Sichuan. Limited by giant panda’s population size and transportation accessibility, the giant panda cultural ecosystem services supply areas had a low supply capacity. Both the demand areas and service flow paths of giant panda cultural ecosystem services revealed a feature of spatial heterogeneity, which were distributed in the east of Sichuan. There were more potential service flow paths than realized ones. The public paid more attention to the social media than the actual usage of the signs. The supply of giant panda cultural ecosystem services did not match the spatial distribution of the demand, which was mainly affected by human population distribution, migration, economic development, and policies.


Key words: flagship species, ecosystem service supply and demand, cultural ecosystem service flow, Giant Panda National Park.