卧龙自然保护区三江珙桐群落种间关系的数量分析

生态学杂志 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 1167-1171.

卧龙自然保护区三江珙桐群落种间关系的数量分析

朱利君¹, 苏智先², 王伟伟¹, 张亚爽¹

1. 西华师范大学生物多样性研究中心四川省环境科学与生物多样性重点实验室, 南充, 637002;
2. 绵阳师范学院, 绵阳, 621000

收稿日期:2004-11-22 修回日期:2005-03-31 出版日期:2005-10-10
通讯作者: 苏智先
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(39770134).

Numerical analysis on interspecific relationships in Davidia involucrata community in Sanjiang Wolong Nature Reserve

ZHU Lijun¹, SU Zhixian², WANG Weiwei¹, ZHANG Yashuang¹

1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Biodiversity of Sichuan Province, Research Center of Biodiversity, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, China;
2. Mianyang Teachers College, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2004-11-22 Revised:2005-03-31 Online:2005-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用2×2列联表的Fisher精确检验、Pearson相关系数和Spearman秩相关系数检验研究了卧龙自然保护区三江珙桐(Davidia involucrata)群落种间关系。测定了83种植物,共3 403个种对的种间关联(或相关)。结果表明,2×2列联表的Fisher精确检验共186个种对为正关联,100个种对为负关联(P<0.05或P<0.01);Pearson相关系数有295个种对为正关联,129个种对为负关联;Spearman秩相关系数有448个种对为正关联,244个种对为负关联。用2×2列联表的Fisher精确检验不能反映两个种对的数量关系,应用Pearson相关系数和Spearman秩相关系数刻化种对间的数量变化关系;与Pearson相关系数检验相比,Spearman秩相关系数检验具有较高的灵敏度。种对的正关联和正相关,主要是由于它们具有相近的生物学特性,对生境具有相似的生态适应性和相互分离的生态位所致;而种对间的负关联和负相关,则主要是由于它们具有不同的生物学特性,对生境具有不同的生态适应性和相互重叠的生态位所致。

关键词: 岷江上游, 土壤侵蚀, 地理信息系统, 遥感, 通用土壤侵蚀方程

Abstract: Employing Fisher's precise test for 2?2 contingency table,Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient,this paper studied the 3 403 species-pairs' interspecific relationships of 83 species in D.involucrata community in Sanjiang Wolong Nature Reserve.The results showed that through Fisher's precise test for 2?2 contingency table,the positive association coefficients of 186 species-pairs were either significant(P<0.05) or highly significant(P<0.01),and the negative association coefficients of other 100 species-pairs were significant or highly significant.The positive correlation coefficients of 295 and 448 species-pairs were significant or highly significant by using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient,respectively,while 129 and 244 species-pairs had significant or highly significant negative correlation coefficients by using the same tests.Because Fisher's precise test for 2?2 contingency table could not numerically reflect the contrasting correlation between species,Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were applied to test the interspecific relationships.Compared with Pearson's correlation coefficient,Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test was more sensitive.Positive association and correlation between species occurred where the members of species-pairs had similar biological characteristics or traits,which made them ecologically adaptive for similar habitats but with segregated niches,while negative association and correlation between species occurred where species had different biological features,which made them differently adaptive for habitats or with overlapping niches.

Key words: Upper reaches of Minjiang River, Soil erosion, Remote sensing, GIS, RUSLE

中图分类号:

Q145

朱利君, 苏智先, 王伟伟, 张亚爽. 卧龙自然保护区三江珙桐群落种间关系的数量分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (10): 1167-1171.

ZHU Lijun, SU Zhixian, WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yashuang. Numerical analysis on interspecific relationships in Davidia involucrata community in Sanjiang Wolong Nature Reserve[J]. cje, 2005, (10): 1167-1171.

[1]	郭贝贝, 崔莹雪. 基于RSEVI和地理探测器的安徽省5A级景区生态脆弱性评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 550-563.
[2]	何洋, 赵喜萍. 基于标准化遥感生态指数的汾河流域生态评价与时序分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 564-575.
[3]	刘浦东, 王远轲, 张冬, 刘建涛. 基于多源数据的小清河流域生态环境时空变化分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 600-608.
[4]	赵开鑫, 李雪梅, 王桂钢, 孙旭伟. 基于GEE平台的黄河源区生态环境质量动态评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 290-298.
[5]	张云霞, 汪仕美, 李焱, 高秉丽, 巩杰. 2000—2020年青藏高原生态质量时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1464-1473.
[6]	董鑫, 陈效锐, 李艳忠, 古晓东, 杨存建. 基于地理探测器的四川省大熊猫国家公园生态环境时空变化及其归因分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 946-955.
[7]	吴小波, 范晓雨, 刘晓敬, 肖林, 马启民, 贺宁, 郜思卓, 乔雨亭. 基于Google Earth Engine云平台的成渝城市群生态环境质量时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 759-768.
[8]	张鹏超, 梁宇, 刘波, 马天啸, 吴苗苗. 基于随机森林模型的青藏高原森林地上生物量遥感估算 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 415-424.
[9]	何天星, 田宁, 周锐, 马群, 张洁, 高峻. 基于GEE和RSEI的长三角一体化示范区生态环境质量动态评估 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 436-444.
[10]	周喆, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 付江涛, 赵吉美, 邢光延, 何伟鹏. 基于GEE的黄河上游生态环境质量动态监测与评价：以龙羊峡至积石峡段为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2545-2554.
[11]	陈泽勋, 刘廷玺, 王怡璇, 张俊怡, 段利民. 模拟降雨条件下典型草原坡面初始产流时间及产流产沙量 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1316-1323.
[12]	陈默, 牟乃夏, 王有霄, 王赛, 刘高焕, 赵忠贺. 近30年黄河三角洲吸附态氮污染量化分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1324-1333.
[13]	王朝阳, 师银芳, 侯诚. 基于Sentinel-2A影像的枸杞种植区域识别 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(5): 1033-1040.
[14]	王志威. 药用植物云南土沉香潜在适生区及其关键气候影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(10): 1991-1997.
[15]	于冬雪, 韩广轩, 王晓杰, 张保华. 互花米草入侵对黄河口潮沟形态特征和植物群落分布的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 42-49.