欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1657-1667.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

长春市土壤侵蚀时空变化及其驱动力

朱哲敏,王明常*,刘子维,刘星男,王凤艳,鲍依临


  

  1. (吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-10 发布日期:2026-05-08

Spatial and temporal variations and driving forces of soil erosion in Changchun City.

ZHU Zhemin, WANG Mingchang*, LIU Ziwei, LIU Xingnan, WANG Fengyan, BAO Yilin   

  1. (College of Geoexploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China).

  • Online:2026-05-10 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 土壤侵蚀会降低土壤肥力和农作物产量,对农业生产和生态环境产生不利影响。由于长期人类活动、气候变化及复杂地貌的共同作用,吉林省长春市土壤侵蚀程度呈现高度的空间异质性,其时空变化规律及影响机制还有待深入研究。本文利用RUSLE方程对1990—2020年长春市的土壤侵蚀程度进行定量评估,借助地理探测器模型探究土壤侵蚀的时空驱动机制,并基于多个未来气候情景预测2030、2040年的土壤侵蚀程度。研究表明:(1)长春市土壤侵蚀在1990—2020年间以微度和轻度侵蚀为主,且空间分布呈现东南高、西北低的特征。微度和轻度侵蚀的占比始终保持在较高水平,1990年微度和轻度侵蚀分别占总面积的97.6%和2.2%,到2020年,微度侵蚀提升至98.1%,轻度侵蚀减少至1.8%。(2)地理探测器模型结果显示,坡度因子为土壤侵蚀的主导因子,q值为31.6%,对土壤侵蚀空间分异具有显著影响。坡度与高程和降雨侵蚀力的交互作用对土壤侵蚀影响程度更大,q值分别为47.0%、40.4%。(3)在自然增长情景下,2030和2040年长春市土壤侵蚀强度略有增加,经济发展情景下亦呈现出轻微上升态势,而生态优先情景下土壤侵蚀强度呈现下降趋势。本研究对于提高土壤保护效率、优化农业生产模式具有重要意义。


关键词: 土壤侵蚀, RUSLE模型, 遥感监测, 驱动机制, 多情景预测, 时空变化

Abstract: Soil erosion reduces soil fertility and crop yields, posing significant threats to agricultural productivity and ecological sustainability. Soil erosion in Changchun exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity, due to the combined effects of long-term human activities, climate change, and complex topography. The spatiotemporal variations and underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. We quantitatively assessed soil erosion in Changchun from 1990 to 2020 using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), analyzed the spatiotemporal driving forces of soil erosion with the help of the Geodetector model, and projected soil erosion intensity in 2030 and 2040 under multiple future climate scenarios. The results showed that: (1) Soil erosion in Changchun was predominantly mild and slight during 1990 to 2020, following a spatial pattern characterized by higher erosion in the southeast and lower in the northwest. Mild and slight erosion consistently dominated, accounting for 97.6% and 2.2% of the total area in 1990, and changing to 98.1% and 1.8% by 2020, respectively. (2) Geodetector results identified slope as the dominant factor influencing soil erosion, with a q value of 31.6%, underscoring its significant role in spatial differentiation. The interaction between slope and elevation, as well as rainfall erosivity, further increased the explanatory power, with q values of 47.0% and 40.4%, respectively. (3) Soil erosion intensity was projected to slightly increase by 2030 and 2040 under the natural growth and economic development scenarios, while a decline was expected under the ecological priority scenario. This study provides valuable insights for improving soil conservation efficiency and optimizing agricultural production models.


Key words: soil erosion, RUSLE model, remote sensing monitoring, driving mechanism, multi-scenario prediction, spatiotemporal variation