欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2572-2580.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.024

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

大兴安岭火烧迹地植被地上生物量恢复的影响因素

徐晓鹏1,2,潘军晓1*,郭蒙2,张心昱1   

  1. 1中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101; 2东北师范大学地理科学学院, 长白山地理过程与生态安全教育部重点实验室, 长春 130024)
  • 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-13

Influencing factors of vegetation aboveground biomass recovery in burned areas of Daxing’an Mountains.

XU Xiaopeng1,2, PAN Junxiao1*, GUO Meng2, ZHANG Xinyu1   

  1. (1Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security of Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-13

摘要: 林火干扰是影响我国北方森林地上生物量的重要因子,火后地上生物量恢复的影响因火烧强度、频率和恢复时间等林火特征而异,同时又受到植物群落结构的调控。明确火烧迹地植被地上生物量恢复的影响因素对于理解森林生态系统植被演替过程及其固碳能力至关重要。本研究以火灾高发的大兴安岭冻土区森林为对象,于2020年对漠河(1987年着火)、呼玛(2003年着火)、松岭(2006年着火)3个不同着火时间的大面积火烧迹地(605个)和相应的对照区(373个)样方进行地上生物量和群落结构调查,解析林火特征和植被群落结构对植被地上生物量恢复的影响。结果发现:(1)漠河、呼玛和松岭(火后33年、17年和14年)3个过火区植被地上生物量分别为81.1、64.6和93.1 t·hm-2,其中,漠河、呼玛的过火区与对照区之间植被地上生物量差异显著(P<0.05),但松岭区差异不显著(P>0.05)。(2)群落多样性和林龄显著影响过火区植被地上生物量,过火区群落多样性和丰富度指数均达到或者显著高于对照区,过火区的近熟林植被地上生物量相较中龄林更接近对照区水平。(3)高火烧烈度显著降低过火区植被地上生物量,随着燃烧烈度的增加(归一化燃烧指数的降低),地上生物量有显著降低趋势。(4)火烧烈度和林龄对植被地上生物量恢复的解释度分别达到30%和22%,高于物种多样性Shannon指数(10%)和物种丰富度(5%)。本研究为理解林火干扰与植被群落结构特征如何影响森林植被地上生物量的恢复规律与驱动因素提供了科学依据。


关键词: 地上生物量, 林火干扰, 物种多样性, 林龄, 火烈度

Abstract: Fire disturbance is a significant factor influencing aboveground biomass (AGB) in northern Chinese forests. The post-fire recovery of AGB depends on fire characteristics such as severity, frequency, and time since fire, and is also modulated by forest community structure. Elucidating the factors that drive AGB recovery in burned areas is essential for understanding community succession and carbon sequestration capacity in forest ecosystems. Focusing on the forests in the permafrost region of Daxing’an Mountains, a fire-prone area, we surveyed AGB and community structure in 2020 across 605 plots from large-scale burned areas with different fire histories, i.e., Mohe (burned in 1987), Huma (2003), and Songling (2006), along with 373 control plots, to analyze the effects of fire characteristics and forest community structure on AGB recovery. The results showed that: (1) AGB in the Mohe, Huma, and Songling burned areas (33, 17, and 14 years post-fire, respectively) was 81.1, 64.6, and 93.1 t·hm-2, respectively. There were significant differences in AGB between burned and control plots in Mohe and Huma (P<0.05), but not in Songling (P>0.05). (2) Community diversity and stand age significantly influenced AGB in burned areas. Diversity and richness indices in burned areas were comparable to or significantly higher than those in control areas. Moreover, AGB in near-mature forests within burned areas more closely approached control levels than that in middleaged forests. (3) High fire severity significantly reduced AGB in burned areas. As fire severity increased (indicated by a decrease in the Normalized Burn Ratio), AGB exhibited a significant declining trend. (4) Fire severity and stand age explained 30% and 22% of the variation in AGB recovery, respectively, with contributions exceeding those of Shannon diversity index (10%) and species richness (5%). This study provides a scientific basis for understanding how fire disturbance and plant community structure jointly shape the patterns and drivers of AGB recovery in forest ecosystems.


Key words: aboveground biomass, forest fire disturbance, species diversity, stand age, fire severity