欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1103-1114.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202603.017

• ·城市生态系统保护与高质量发展专栏· • 上一篇    下一篇

重庆城乡融合发展试验区生态风险时空演变与驱动机制

李媛媛1,尹珂1*,肖轶2,丁晨浩3   

  1. 1重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆 401331; 2重庆工商大学公共管理学院, 重庆 400067; 3华东师范大学地理科学学院, 上海 200241)

  • 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-09

Spatiotemporal variations and driving mechanism of ecological risk in Chongqing urban-rural integration development pilot area.

LI Yuanyuan1, YIN Ke1*, XIAO Yi2, DING Chenhao3   

  1. (1School of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China; 2College of Public Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China; 3School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China).

  • Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-09

摘要: 城乡融合发展试验区资源要素流动和景观变化复杂,科学评估生态风险演变及其影响因素对优化城乡土地资源管控和区域生态修复至关重要。运用改进后的景观生态风险评价模型、空间杜宾模型等,分析2002—2022年重庆城乡融合发展试验区生态风险演化,识别各阶段及高值聚集区生态风险的驱动因素及空间效应。结果表明:城乡融合初步探索期(2002—2012年)景观变化相对缓和,改革深化期(2012—2017年)和深入推进期(2017—2022年)变化显著,景观综合动态度分别为1.08%和1.00%;研究期内区域生态风险先增后降,改革深化期达到较高风险水平,空间上呈“西北低,东南高”分布格局,毗邻重庆市中心城区的乡镇为风险易变区;试验区生态风险存在空间正向聚集,各乡镇间生态风险交互影响显著;自然和人为因素对区域生态风险的空间效应呈阶段性变化,地表人类活动强度始终是正向主导因子,耕地面积为负向显著因素,而最高气温(Max_tem)和GDP逐渐成为重要胁迫因子;地表人类活动强度的空间效应以及Max_tem和生境质量的溢出效应是导致试验区高生态风险乡镇聚集的主要驱动力。因此,未来应加强区域间及跨区域生态风险的协同治理,注重城乡人类活动和资源管理的协调发展,构建稳定可持续的区域生态安全格局。


关键词: 城乡融合发展试验区, 景观生态风险, 空间杜宾模型, 影响因素

Abstract: The urban-rural integration pilot area is characterized by complex resource and element flows, as well as dynamic landscape transformations. Scientifically assessing the evolution of ecological risk and influencing factors is crucial for optimizing urban-rural land resource management and facilitating regional ecological restoration. In this study, we employed an improved landscape ecological risk assessment model and the Spatial Durbin Model to analyze the evolution of ecological risk in Chongqing urban-rural integration pilot area from 2002 to 2022. We identified the driving factors and spatial effects of ecological risk at different stages and within high-risk clusters. The results showed that landscape changes were relatively moderate during the initial exploration period of urban-rural integration (2002-2012). Significant changes occurred during the reform deepening period (2012-2017) and intensive advancement period (2017-2022), with comprehensive landscape dynamics reaching 1.08% and 1.00%, respectively. Throughout the study period, the regional ecological risk initially increased and then decreased, peaking at a high-risk level during the reform deepening period. Spatially, ecological risk followed a pattern of lower in the northwest and higher in the southeast. The towns adjacent to Chongqing central urban area showed high volatility in risk levels. Ecological risk in the pilot area demonstrated positive spatial clustering, with significant inter-town interactions in ecological risk. The spatial effects of natural and human factors on regional ecological risks varied by stages. Human activity intensity on the land surface consistently emerged as the leading positive factor, the cultivated land area was a significant negative factor, and the maximum temperature (Max_tem) and GDP gradually became important stressors. The spatial effects of human activity intensity on the land surface, along with the spillover effects of Max_tem and habitat quality, were the primary drivers of high ecological risk clustering in towns within the pilot area. Therefore, future strategies should emphasize collaborative ecological risk governance across regions to promote the coordinated development of urban-rural human activities and resource management. This approach is crucial for establishing a stable and sustainable regional ecological security pattern.


Key words: urban-rural integration development pilot area, landscape ecological risk, Spatial Durbin Model, influencing factor