欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1509-1520.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202405.046

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    

高原河谷县域景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局构建: 以云南省大理州永平县为例

杜佳衡,王影雪,潘悦,王锦*   

  1. (西南林业大学园林园艺学院, 昆明 650224)
  • 出版日期:2024-05-10 发布日期:2024-07-10

Ecological risk assessment and ecological security pattern construction of county-level landscape in plateau valley: A case study in Yongping County, Dali Prefecture, Yunnan Province.

DU Jiaheng, WANG Yingxue, PAN Yue, WANG Jin*   

  1. (School of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China).

  • Online:2024-05-10 Published:2024-07-10

摘要: 维护高原河谷县域生态安全是推进高原地区新时代经济高质量发展的关键途径,对于提升住民福祉及实现高原河谷县域可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究选取高原河谷县域云南省大理州永平县为对象,基于景观生态学原理,以景观指数法建立景观生态风险评价模型,综合运用InVEST-MSPA-Conefor分析方法确定生态源地,结合最小阻力模型和重力模型提取生态廊道,利用水文分析工具提取辐射通道并识别生态战略节点、生态断裂点,运用阻力阈值法建立保护关键区,最终构建永平县的生态安全格局。结果表明:2020年永平县景观生态风险呈现出“西北、西南、东北低”,“中南、东、西高”的空间格局;生态风险低值区植被覆盖良好,受人为活动干扰较少,生态环境质量好;高值区位于耕地、建设用地集中连片分布地带,生态环境质量较差,是进行生态建设的关键区域;研究共识别出14处生态源地、102条一般廊道、18条关键廊道、138条辐射通道、62个生态战略节点、88个生态断裂点以及6片保护关键区,这些组分共同构成永平县的生态安全格局。


关键词: 景观生态风险, 生态安全格局, 高原河谷, 永平县

Abstract: Maintaining ecological security of county-level landscape is a key way to promote high-quality economic development of plateau area in the new era, and is of great significance for improving the well-being of residents and realizing sustainable development of plateau valley counties. In this study, Yongping County, Dali Prefecture, Yunnan Province was selected as the research area. Based on the principles of landscape ecology, a landscape ecological risk assessment model was established with the landscape index method, and the InVEST-MSPA-Conefor analysis method was used to determine ecological sources. The Minimum Cumulative Resistance model and Gravity model was employed to extract ecological corridors. Hydrological analysis tools were used to extract radiation channels. Ecological strategic nodes and ecological breakpoints were identified. The resistance threshold method was used to identify key areas for protection. Finally, the ecological security pattern of Yongping County was constructed. The results showed that landscape ecological risk of Yongping County in 2020 presented a spatial pattern of “low in the northwest, southwest, and northeast” and “high in the central south, east, and west”. The low ecological risk areas had good vegetation coverage, less disturbance from human activities, and good ecological environment quality. The high ecological risk areas were located in the contiguous distribution area of cultivated land and construction land, and ecological environment quality was relatively poor, which was the key area for ecological construction. We identified 14 ecological sources, 102 general corridors, 18 key corridors, 138 radiation channels, 62 ecological strategic nodes, 88 ecological break points, and 6 key protection areas, which together constituted the ecological security pattern of Yongping County. Our results had important guiding significance for the ecological security construction of Yongping County.


Key words: landscape ecological risk, ecological security pattern, plateau valley, Yongping County