欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 750-759.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202203.031

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复优先区确定——以河北省遵化市为例

袁媛1,白中科1,2,3*,师学义1,赵雪娇1,张嘉楠1,杨博宇1   

  1. 1中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院, 北京 100083; 2自然资源部土地整治重点实验室, 北京 100035;3自然资源部矿区生态修复工程技术创新中心, 北京 100035)
  • 出版日期:2022-04-10 发布日期:2022-09-09

Determining priority areas for ecosystem preservation and restoration of territory based on ecological security pattern: A case study in Zunhua City, Hebei Province.

YUAN Yuan1, BAI Zhong-ke1,2,3*, SHI Xue-yi1, ZHAO Xue-jiao1, ZHANG Jia-nan1, YANG Bo-yu1   

  1. (1School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China; 3Technology Innovation Center of Ecological Restoration Engineering in Mining Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China).
  • Online:2022-04-10 Published:2022-09-09

摘要: 国土空间生态保护修复是落实生态文明建设的重大举措。准确识别优先修复地域,是有序推进生态保护修复工作的基本前提。本文以河北省遵化市为例,通过斑块连通性、生境质量分析和生态系统服务价值测算确定生态源地。利用电路理论判别生态廊道,构建市域生态安全格局,识别生态“夹点”、生态障碍点、生态断裂点等国土空间生态保护修复的优先区。结果表明:遵化市生态源地面积为113.16 km2,占研究区总面积的7.5%,以林地和草地为主,集中分布在市域南部;生态廊道共计56条,总面积208.85 km2。共识别16处生态“夹点”、26处障碍点、76处断裂点,区域生境连通性仍有较大的提升空间。基于已构建的生态安全格局,将遵化市分为生态保育区、生态改善区和生态提升区,提出不同分区下生态保护修复策略,以期为生态系统整体保护修复工作提供参考。

关键词: 生态安全格局, 电路理论, 生态“夹点”, 生态障碍点, 生态断裂点

Abstract: Ecological protection and restoration for territorial space is a major pathway to implement ecological civilization construction. Accurately identifying priority areas of territorial space for ecological restoration is the prerequisite for the orderly promotion of ecological protection and restoration. Taking Zunhua City, Hebei Province as the research area, ecological sources were determined through connectivity analysis, habitat quality evaluation, and ecosystem service value calculation. The circuit theory was applied to determine corridors, construct ecological security pattern, and identify ecological pinch points, barrier points, break points, and other priority areas for ecological protection and restoration of territorial space. The results showed that the areas of ecological sources were 113.16 km2, accounting for 7.5% of the total. Most of the ecological sources were forests and grasslands, which were mainly distributed in the south of the city. There were 56 ecological corridors with a total area of 208.85 km2. Weidentified 16 pinch points, 26 barrier points, and 76 break points. There was much to do for improving regional habitat connectivity. Based on the constructed ecological security pattern, Zunhua City was divided into ecological conservation zone, ecological upgrading zone, and ecological enhancement areas. We proposed ecological protection and restoration strategies for different zones, to provide scientific references for overall protection and restoration of ecosystems.

Key words: ecological security pattern, circuit theory, ecological pinch point, ecological barrier point, ecological break point.