欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1314-1323.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202405.003

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽西北沙地苹果-农作物间作对土壤养分分布和收益的影响

张加良,孔涛*,高熙梣,李多美,李佳,梁静一   

  1. (辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院, 辽宁阜新 123000)
  • 出版日期:2024-05-10 发布日期:2024-07-10

Effects of apple-crop intercropping on soil nutrient distribution and income in sandy land of northwestern Liaoning Province.

ZHANG Jialiang, KONG Tao*, GAO Xichen, LI Duomei, LI Jia, LIANG Jingyi   

  1. (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China).

  • Online:2024-05-10 Published:2024-07-10

摘要: 辽西北沙地区域生态脆弱,果农间作能够实现生态保护和经济收益双赢,应用较为广泛。为掌握辽西北沙地果农间作系统的土壤养分分布特征,选取苹果-花生、苹果-红薯、苹果-大豆、苹果-谷子4种间作系统作为研究对象,对不同间作系统0~60 cm土层、0~300 cm水平距离范围内的土壤碳氮磷空间分布特征和经济收益进行分析,并与苹果单作、作物单作进行对比。结果表明:在垂直方向上,各间作系统各土壤养分均表现出表聚性,表土层(0~20 cm)土壤养分含量显著高于深土层(20~60 cm);在水平方向上,苹果花生间作的土壤养分激烈竞争位点较为均匀的分布在0~300 cm水平距离范围内;苹果-红薯、苹果-大豆、苹果-谷子间作的土壤各养分激烈竞争位点总体位于果树带(0~100 cm)。对土壤养分综合指数而言,在9类种植模式中,花生单作、苹果单作、苹果-花生间作显著高于其他模式。就养分效应而言,氮素总体表现为正效应,碳磷总体表现为负效应,辽西北沙地苹果-农作物间作系统中存在明显的养分竞争关系,4种间作系统对土壤磷素需求量较大。4种间作中,苹果-红薯的土地当量比(LER)和土地收益比(IER)最高,苹果-谷子的LER最低,苹果-大豆IER最低;从土壤养分与土地收益的综合指标——土地种植评价指数角度考虑,间作模式的评价指数优于单作,苹果-花生间作模式为最优选择。综上所述,苹果-花生间作模式是辽西北沙地果农间作的最优模式,建议在苹果-花生间作模式的养分激烈竞争位点处多施入有机肥和磷肥。


关键词: 果农间作, 土壤养分, 空间分布, 经济收益, 辽西北沙地

Abstract: Sandy land in northwestern Liaoning Province is ecologically fragile. Fruit-crop intercropping can realize the win-win situation of ecological protection and economic benefits, and is widely used. We investigated the distribution of soil nutrients in four fruit-crop intercropping systems, including apple-peanut, apple-sweet potato, apple-soybean, and apple-millet, in sandy land of northwestern Liaoning Province. We analyzed the spatial distributions of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in 0-60 cm layer and 0-300 cm horizontal distance as well as economic benefits of different intercropping systems, and compared with apple monoculture and crop monocultures. In the vertical direction, soil nutrients in intercropping systems showed surface aggregation, with higher nutrient content of topsoil (0-20 cm) than that of deep soil layer (20-60 cm). In the horizontal direction, the nutrient competitive sites of apple-peanut intercropping system were evenly distributed in the horizontal range of 0-300 cm, while those of apple-sweet potato, apple-soybean, and apple-millet intercropping systems were generally located within 0-100 cm along the fruit belts. The soil nutrient comprehensive index in peanut monoculture, apple monoculture, and apple-peanut intercropping system were significantly higher than other cropping patterns. As for the nutrient effect, nitrogen showed a positive effect, while carbon and phosphorus showed a negative effect. There was an obvious nutrient competition in the apple-crop intercropping systems, and the four intercropping systems had greater demand for soil phosphorus. Among the four intercropping systems, apple-sweet potato intercropping system had the highest land equivalent ratio (LER) and income equivalent ratio (IER), apple-millet intercropping system had the lowest LER, and apple-soybean intercropping system had the lowest IER. From the perspective of land planting evaluation index, which is a comprehensive index of soil nutrient and land return, intercropping patterns perform better than monoculture, with the apple-peanut intercropping system being the best. In conclusion, the apple-peanut intercropping system is the best fruit-crop intercropping pattern in the sandy land of northwestern Liaoning Province. It is suggested to apply more organic fertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer at the nutrient competitive sites of the apple-peanut intercropping systems.


Key words: fruit-crop intercropping, soil nutrient, spatial distribution, economic benefit, sandy land in northwestern Liaoning Province