欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2787-2794.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.014

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于有效积温和支持向量机的早稻抽穗期分场景预报模型

田俊1,2,刘丹1,3,吴伟鑫1,3,吴建明4*   

  1. 1江西省气象科学研究所, 南昌 330096; 2南昌国家气候观象台, 南昌 330218; 3气候变化风险与气象灾害防御江西省重点实验室, 南昌 330096; 4江西省气象服务中心, 南昌 330096)

  • 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-20

Scenario-based forecasting of early rice heading date: Integrating effective accumulated temperature with support vector machine.

TIAN Jun1,2, LIU Dan1,3, WU Weixin1,3, WU Jianming4*   

  1. (1Jiangxi Institute of Meteorological Science, Nanchang 330096, China; 2Nanchang National Climate Observatory, Nanchang 330218, China; 3Key Laboratory of Climate Change Risk and Meteorological Disaster Prevention of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330096, China; 4Jiangxi Provincial Meteorological Service Center, Nanchang 330096, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-20

摘要: 为提升不同气象条件下早稻抽穗期预报精度,本研究基于江西省1994—2023年农业气象观测数据,构建了融合有效积温(EAT)与支持向量机(SVM)的分场景预报模型,并分析了其适用条件和预报效果。结果表明:基于15 ℃阈值和纬度构建的EAT模型对早稻抽穗期模拟预报的整体精度较高,平均绝对误差(MAE)为3.1 d,预报精度达91.6%,尤其适用于分蘖至抽穗期正常天气条件下的较长提前期预报;但当分蘖至抽穗期遭遇持续低温/偏暖、阶段强降温/升温等四类异常天气过程时,EAT预报误差明显增大。SVM模型通过分阶段引入关键气象因子,包括5月中旬阴天日数、5月中旬至6月上旬气温要素和日照时数、6月中旬日照时数和阴雨日数,可有效改进EAT模型在异常天气下的预报误差,将EAT预报误差≥3 d的样本MAE从5.2 d降至3.3 d,降幅达36.5%;尤其对持续低温过程的订正效果最优,将其平均预报误差从5.7 d降至2.4 d,降幅达57.9%。据此提出“正常天气采用EAT预报,异常天气利用SVM订正”的分场景动态预报策略。该策略在维持常态天气下EAT优势的同时,提升了异常天气下的预报准确性,为复杂气候条件下的作物发育期精准预报提供了有效方法。


关键词: 早稻, 抽穗期预报, 支持向量机, 有效积温

Abstract: To improve the forecasting accuracy of early rice heading date across diverse meteorological regimes, we developed a scenario-based model that integrates effective accumulated temperature (EAT) with support vector machine (SVM), trained on 30 years (1994-2023) of agrometeorological records from Jiangxi Province, China. The applicability and predictive performance of this model were then evaluated. Results showed that the EAT model, calibrated with 15 ℃ base temperature and adjusted for latitude, achieved high overall accuracy for early rice heading date prediction (mean absolute error (MAE)=3.1 d, accuracy=91.6%), and was particularly suitable for long leadtime forecasting under normal weather from tillering to heading. However, when this period experienced any of four abnormal weather regimes—sustained low/warm temperature, stage strong cooling/warming events, the EAT error significantly increased. The SVM model that sequentially ingested key meteorological factors, including the number of cloudy days in mid-May, temperature factors, and sunshine hours from mid-May to early June, as well as sunshine hours and cloudy (rainy) days in mid-June, effectively reduced these errors: among samples where the EAT errors were ≥3 d, SVM lowered MAE from 5.2 d to 3.3 d (a 36.5% reduction). The correction was most pronounced for prolonged low-temperature episodes, with the average forecast error being reduced from 5.7 d to 2.4 d (a 57.9% reduction). Accordingly, we proposed a scenario-adaptive strategy “EAT for normal conditions and SVM correction for abnormal conditions”, that maintains EAT’s advantage under normal weather while improving accuracy under climate extremes, providing an effective solution for precise forecasting of crop development stage under complex climatic conditions.


Key words: early rice, heading date forecast, support vector machine, effective accumulated temperature