欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2795-2808.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.023

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多物种鸟类栖息适宜性的生态网络构建与生态关键区识别:以赣西北修河流域为例

范莎莎1,2,龚曦1,2,钱云3,张微微1,2,李宝勇1,2*,陈杰1,2,陈佳依1,2   

  1. (1江西农业大学林学院, 南昌 330045; 2保护生物学江西省重点实验室, 南昌 330045; 3北京林业大学园林学院, 北京 100083)

  • 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-20

Construction of an ecological network based on multi-guild bird habitat suitability and identification of key ecological areas: A case study of the Xiuhe River Basin in northwestern Jiangxi Province.

FAN Shasha1,2, GONG Xi1,2, QIAN Yun3, ZHANG Weiwei1,2, LI Baoyong1,2*, CHEN Jie1,2, CHEN Jiayi1,2   

  1. (1College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330045, China; 3College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-20

摘要: 构建多类群鸟类生态网络并识别生态功能瓶颈区,已成为遏制鸟类栖息地破碎化与生物多样性衰退的重要生态保护路径。本文以亚洲重要越冬候鸟栖息地——修河流域为研究区,聚焦林栖留鸟(FRB)、林栖冬候鸟(FWB)和水栖冬候鸟(AWB)3个类群,结合其生态习性差异,设定适用于不同类群的差异化环境因子与阻力面参数,基于最大熵模型与电路理论开展多物种栖息适宜性建模与多类群生态网络构建,并识别生态关键区,旨在实现物种生态响应机制与空间建模参数配置之间的高度匹配,为多物种生态网络精细化模拟提供理论支持。结果表明:(1)三类群适宜栖息地与生态源地空间分布差异显著,AWB主要分布在鄱阳湖湿地及邻近水域,FWB源地分布于九岭山脉东部和入湖口附近,FRB则广泛分布于九岭山脉、幕阜山脉、梅岭和修河入湖口等地;(2)因源地分布差异,不同类群迁徙路径也各异。共识别出生态廊道129条,其中重要廊道AWB 3条、FWB 8条、FRB 19条,一般廊道AWB 11条、FWB 18条、FRB 70条;(3)识别并划定了6个生态关键区,呈现出水陆交错、农林镶嵌等多样化的空间格局,分别面临城镇建设侵占、农业扩张与交通设施割裂等威胁。据此提出差异化保护与管理策略,以期为修河流域生物多样性保护及管理提供科学依据。


关键词: 修河流域, 多类群, 生态夹点, 生态障碍点, 鄱阳湖流域

Abstract: Establishing multi-guild bird ecological networks and identifying ecological functional bottleneck areas have become crucial ecological conservation approaches to curb habitat fragmentation and biodiversity decline. We examined three guilds, including forest resident birds (FRB), forest wintering migratory birds (FWB), and aquatic wintering migratory birds (AWB), in the Xiuhe River Basin, an important overwintering habitat for migratory birds in Asia. Considering the differences in their ecological habits, we set differentiated environmental factors and resistance surface parameters suitable for different guilds. Based on the MaxEnt model and circuit theory, we conducted habitat suitability modeling for multiple species, constructed multi-guild ecological networks, and identified key ecological areas. This study aimed to achieve a high degree of matching between ecological response mechanisms and the configuration of spatial modeling parameters, and to provide theoretical support for the refined simulation of multi-species ecological networks. The results showed that: (1) There were significant spatial distribution differences between the suitable habitats and ecological source areas across the three guilds. AWB primarily inhabited Poyang Lake wetlands and adjacent waters. FWB source areas were located in the eastern Jiuling Mountains and near lake inlets. FRB source areas were widely distributed across the Jiuling Mountains, Mufu Mountains, Meiling, and the Xiuhe River lake inlet. (2) Migration pathways varied across the three guilds due to differing source distribution patterns. A total of 129 ecological corridors were identified, comprising 3 major corridors for AWB, 8 for FWB, and 19 for FRB; alongside 11 minor corridors for AWB, 18 for FWB, and 70 for FRB. (3) Six key ecological areas were identified and delineated, showing diverse spatial patterns, such as water-land ecotones and agriculture-forest mosaics. These areas were threatened by urban and agricultural expansion and fragmentation caused by transportation infrastructure. Accordingly, differentiated strategies are proposed to provide a scientific basis for biodiversity conservation and management in the Xiuhe River Basin.

Key words: Xiu River Basin, multi-guild, ecological pinch point, ecological barrier point, Poyang Lake Basin