欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2846-2854.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202509.038

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤养分对4种水土保持植物养分重吸收特征的影响

王红双1,潘理1,谷会岩1,王秀伟1,2*   

  1. 1东北林业大学林学院, 哈尔滨 150040; 2森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室(东北林业大学), 哈尔滨 150040)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-03

Effects of soil nutrients on nutrient resorption of four plant species used for soil and water conservation.

WANG Hongshuang1, PAN Li1, GU Huiyan1, WANG Xiuwei1,2*   

  1. (1School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China).

  • Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-03

摘要: 养分重吸收是植物一种通过养分回收以减少对环境养分依赖的重要养分保存策略。为了解水土保持植物养分重吸收应对土壤养分变化的响应规律,本研究以小黑杨、落叶松、无芒雀麦以及紫穗槐4种北方常见水土保持植物为对象,通过土层剥离模拟自然条件下土壤不同退化程度,研究植物叶片氮(N)、磷(P)重吸收模式对土壤养分变化的响应。结果表明:不同退化程度下植物鲜叶及凋落叶N、P含量差异显著,N、P重吸收率差异不显著但重吸收度(即凋落叶N、P含量)差异显著。N、P重吸收与叶片N、P含量显著相关,叶片养分含量以及土壤养分因子是影响植物养分重吸收的重要因素,解释了61%~96%的N、P重吸收率以及重吸收度的变异。养分重吸收度相较于养分重吸收率对土壤养分更敏感,叶片养分含量是调控叶片养分重吸收的主要因子。不同植物重吸收能力存在差异,无芒雀麦重吸收度最高,养分保存能力强以减少对土壤养分的依赖,小黑杨重吸收度低而凋落叶质量高从而可通过凋落叶归还更多养分。


关键词: 养分重吸收, 退化, 水土保持, 养分保存

Abstract: Nutrient resorption is an important nutrient conservation strategy for plants to reduce their dependence on environmental nutrients. We examined the responses of nutrient resorption of four common plant species used for soil and water conservation to soil nutrient changes, namely, Populus × xiaohei, Larix gmelinii, Bromus inermis and Amorpha fruticosa. Soil degradation levels of natural conditions were simulated by soil stripping. The results showed that there were significant differences in N and P contents of fresh and senesced leaves under different soil degradation levels. The differences in the N and P resorption efficiency were not significant but the differences in the resorption proficiency (i.e., the N and P contents of senesced leaves) were significant across different soil degradation levels. N and P resorption were significantly correlated with foliar N and P contents. The nutrient contents in leaves and soil nutrient factors were important factors affecting the nutrient resorption, explaining 61%-96% of the variation in N and P resorption efficiency and resorption proficiency. Nutrient resorption proficiency was more sensitive to soil nutrients than resorption efficiency. Leaf nutrient content was the main factor regulating nutrient resorption. There were differences in the resorption capacity of different species. Bromus inermis had the highest resorption proficiency, with a strong nutrient conservation capacity to minimize its dependence on soil nutrients. By contrast, Populus × xiaohei had lower resorption proficiency but higher quality of senesced leaves, which allowed more nutrients to be returned through the senesced leaves.


Key words: nutrient resorption, degradation, soil and water conservation, nutrient conservation