欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1393-1408.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202504.014

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    

陆地生态系统碳汇能力估算及空间分布特征:以嘉兴西南三县为例

干靓1,2*,朱佩露3,杨颖4
  

  1. 1同济大学建筑与城市规划学院, 上海 200092; 2自然资源部国土空间智能规划技术重点实验室, 上海 200092; 3杭州市规划设计研究院规划研究中心, 杭州 310012; 4上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司空间规划研究院, 上海 200092)

  • 出版日期:2025-04-10 发布日期:2025-04-15

Estimation and spatial distribution of carbon sink capacity in terrestrial ecosystems: A case study of three counties in southwest Jiaxing.

GAN Jing1,2*, ZHU Peilu3, YANG Ying4   

  1. (1College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources of China, Shanghai 200092, China; 3Planning Research Center, Hangzhou City Planning and Design Academy, Hangzhou 310012, China; 4Institute of Spatial Planning, Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China).

  • Online:2025-04-10 Published:2025-04-15

摘要: 全球气候变化问题日益严重,绿色低碳转型势在必行。定量估算陆地生态系统碳汇能力有助于掌握碳汇资源本底、识别碳汇重要空间、制定固碳增汇策略。本文以浙江嘉兴西南三县为例,综合碳储量和净生态系统生产力双要素进行碳汇能力评价,并探讨不同用地布局模式下的碳汇能力差异。结果表明,嘉兴西南三县陆地生态系统的碳储量总量为1.54 Tg,平均碳密度为35.06 t·hm-2,高值区对应南部山林区以及北部的园地集聚片区,距离城市中心越近其碳储量和碳密度越低;净生态系统生产力平均值为463.34 g·m-2·a-1,碳源区域主要集中于城市建成区附近以及南侧钱塘江沿岸,碳汇高值区域主要位于南部山林区以及海盐县部分零散林地。整体上,碳汇能力表现为林地>园地>绿地与开敞空间用地,且细碎化、分散化、边缘化程度越高的生态系统碳汇能力越低。基于研究结果针对不同用地类型提出了差异化的碳汇能力提升策略。


关键词: 生态系统碳汇, 碳储量, 净生态系统生产力, 空间分布

Abstract: Global climate change is becoming increasingly serious, and thereby green and low-carbon transformation is imperative. Quantification of terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink capacity is helpful to acquiring detail information about carbon sink resources, identifying the important spaces for carbon sink, and formulating strategies for enhancing carbon sink capacity. We evaluated carbon sink capacity of three counties in southwest Jiaxing based on the two factors, namely carbon storage and net ecosystem productivity. We further explored the differences in carbon sink capacity under different land use patterns. The results showed that the total carbon storage of the three counties in southwest Jiaxing was 1.54 Tg, with an average carbon density of 35.06 t·hm-2. The high-value areas were the mountain forest land in the south and the land for economic crops in the north. The closer to the city center, the lower the carbon storage and carbon density. The average net ecosystem productivity was 463.34 g·m-2·a-1. The carbon source areas were mainly concentrated near the urban built-up areas and along the Qiantang River in the south, while the areas with high carbon sink values were mainly located in the southern mountain forest lands and some scattered woodlands in Haiyan County. Overall, the ranking of carbon sink capacity of land use types was forest land > land for economic crops > land for green and open space. The higher the degree of fragmentation, decentralization and marginalization, the lower the carbon sink capacity of terrestrial ecosystems. Strategies for enhancing carbon sink capacity were proposed for different land use types.


Key words: ecosystem carbon sink, carbon storage, net ecosystem productivity, spatial distribution