欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3684-3692.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202412.015

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

干旱胁迫下模拟氮沉降对大豆氮磷化学计量特征的影响

姚星州,王岩*,王伟平,吴佳宁,赵天宏   

  1. (沈阳农业大学农学院, 沈阳 110866)
  • 出版日期:2024-12-10 发布日期:2024-12-09

Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on N and P stoichiometric characteristics of soybean under drought stress.

YAO Xingzhou, WANG Yan*, WANG Weiping, WU Jianing, ZHAO Tianhong   

  1. (College Agronomy of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China).

  • Online:2024-12-10 Published:2024-12-09

摘要: 研究干旱胁迫下氮沉降升高对大豆(Glycine max)器官生态化学计量特征的影响,对预测未来生态过程和指导农业可持续发展有重要作用。以“铁丰29号”大豆为试验对象,利用盆栽探讨干旱胁迫后模拟氮沉降对大豆不同器官氮磷化学计量特征的影响。试验设置8个处理:2个水分水平:正常水分(W,75%±5%)、干旱(D,35%±5%),4个氮添加水平:CK、LN、MN、HN(分3次施氮,氮添加分别共计0、50、100、150 kg·hm-2·a-1)。结果表明:干旱胁迫和氮沉降交互作用对大豆根、茎、叶的N、P含量及N/P均有显著影响。与CK-D处理相比,随着氮处理浓度的上升,一次氮处理后根N含量逐渐下降,HN-D处理显著降低19.3%,茎P含量先升后降,LN-D处理显著升高38.2%,叶P含量逐渐上升,HN-D处理显著增加31.2%;两次氮处理后,根N含量显著低于CK-D处理,各处理间差异不显著,茎P含量逐渐下降,HN-D处理显著降低18.9%,叶N含量先升后降,MN-D处理显著增加18.5%;三次氮处理后,根N含量逐渐下降,HN-D处理显著降低19.7%,茎N含量先升后降,HN-D处理显著降低22.6%,叶P含量显著低于CK-D处理,各处理间差异不显著。施氮后,在大豆叶片N-P关系的幂函数中(N=βPααβ为常数),W处理α值<1,D处理α值>1,大豆叶片N/P>16。大豆根、茎N含量之间关系显著,茎、叶N含量之间关系极显著,大豆根、叶N之间呈极显著正相关,而茎N、P之间无显著关系。综上所述,生育前期施氮可以缓解大豆受干旱胁迫的负面效应。随着氮沉降浓度的升高以及施氮次数的增加,大豆生长受P限制。


关键词: 干旱胁迫, 氮沉降, 植物器官, 生态化学计量, 大豆

Abstract: Investigating the impact of increased nitrogen (N) deposition under drought stress on the ecological stoichiometry of soybean (Glycine max) organs is pivotal for predicting ecological processes and guiding sustainable agricultural development. We explored the effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on N and phosphorus (P) stoichiometry of different organs of soybean cultivar “Tiefeng 29” following drought stress in a pot experiment. There were eight treatments with two water levels: normal moisture (W, 75%±5%), drought (D, 35%±5%), and four N addition levels: CK, LN, MN, HN (nitrogen application was divided into three times, with nitrogen addition amount totaling 0, 50, 100, 150 kg·hm-2·a-1). The results showed that the interaction between drought stress and N deposition significantly affected N and P concentration and the N/P ratio in roots, stems, and leaves. Compared with the  CK-D treatment, with the increase of N addition level, root N concentration gradually decreased after one time of N addition, and significantly decreased by 19.3% in the HN-D treatment. The stem P concentration first increased and then decreased, and significantly increased by 38.2% in the LN-D treatment. The leaf P concentration gradually increased, and significantly increased by 31.2% in the HN-D treatment. After two times of N additions, root N concentration was significantly lower than that of CK-D treatment, and there was no significant difference among various N treatments (LN, MN, HN). The stem P concentration gradually decreased, and significantly decreased by 18.9% in the HN-D treatment. The leaf N concentration increased first and then decreased, and significantly increased by 18.5% in the MN-D treatment. After three times of N additions, root N concentration decreased gradually, and significantly decreased by 19.7% in the HN-D treatment. Stem N concentration increased first and then decreased, and significantly decreased by 22.6% in the HN-D treatment. Leaf P concentration was significantly lower than CK-D treatment, and there was no significant difference among treatments (LN, MN, HN). Furthermore, after N application, in the power function relation of leaf N-P (N=βPα, both α and β are constants), α of W treatment was <1, α of D treatment was >1, with leaf N/P ratios exceeding 16. There was a significant relationship between root and stem N concentration, a highly significant relationship between stem and leaf N concentration, a highly significant positive correlation between root and leaf N concentration, and no significant relationship between stem N and P concentration. In conclusion, early N application can mitigate the negative effects of drought stress on soybean. However, as N deposition increases and the times of nitrogen application rises, soybean growth is limited by P availability.


Key words: drought, nitrogen deposition, plant organ, ecological stoichiometry, soybean