欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1774-1782.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202305.030

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑龙江省樟子松人工林含碳量估算方法的比较

倪添,谢龙飞,董利虎*   

  1. (东北林业大学, 哈尔滨 150000)
  • 出版日期:2023-07-10 发布日期:2023-07-07

Comparison of carbon estimation approaches for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation in Heilongjiang Province.

NI Tian, XIE Longfei, DONG Lihu*   

  1. (Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China).
  • Online:2023-07-10 Published:2023-07-07

摘要: 基于36株樟子松解析木数据构建一元、二元生物量和含碳量可加性模型,采用非线性似乎不相关回归的方法进行参数估计,使用“刀切法”对所建立的生物量和含碳量模型系统进行评价,比较5种立木含碳量估算方法的差异。结果表明:所建立的樟子松可加性生物量和含碳量模型拟合效果较好,其调整后确定系数(Ra2)均大于0.90;检验结果表明,所有模型预测误差较小,其中平均预测误差(MPE)为-0.5~0.5 kg,平均误差绝对值(MAE)小于15 kg,拟合指数(FI)大于0.88;当添加树高变量后,二元模型可以有效地提高立木总生物量和含碳量模型的拟合效果和预测能力;对比不同含碳量估算方法发现,利用含碳量模型估算樟子松各器官及总含碳量时具有明显优势,通用含碳率0.45和0.50估算立木含碳量可能会产生较大误差。综上,本文所建立的生物量和含碳量模型能精准预测樟子松各器官以及立木总体生物量和含碳量,在估算立木含碳量时二元含碳量模型法误差更小。


关键词: 樟子松人工林, 含碳量, 聚合型可加性模型, 刀切法检验

Abstract: Based on data of 36 analytical trees of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, we developed univariate and binary additive models for the estimation of biomass and carbon stock. The nonlinear seemingly uncorrelated regression was used to estimate the parameters, while the jackknifing technique was used to evaluate the predictive ability. Covariance analysis was used to eliminate differences between individual trees. Differences among the five approaches estimating carbon stock were tested with ANOVA. All models fitted well. The adjusted coefficient of determination (Ra2) was above 0.90. The mean prediction error (MPE) was between -0.5 and 0.5 kg, the mean absolute error (MAE) was less than 15 kg, and all models had a good fit index (FI>0.88). With the addition of tree height as a variable, the binary model could improve the fitting effect and predictive ability of models for biomass and carbon stock. By comparing different methods, we found that the carbon stock model had obvious advantages in estimating the carbon stock of each organ and the whole tree. The approaches using the carbon concentration constant (i.e. 0.45 or 0.50) produced significant biases in estimating carbon stock of individual trees. In conclusion, the models for the estimation of biomass and carbon stock established in this study can accurately predict the biomass and carbon stock of each organ and individual trees. The error of the binary carbon stock model is smaller when estimating carbon stock of individual trees.


Key words: Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation, carbon stock, aggregate additive model, jackknifing technique.