滇中阳宗海流域过去1200年以来的环境变化

生态学杂志

滇中阳宗海流域过去1200年以来的环境变化

余晓珊^1,2,蒙红卫^1*,黄林培¹,孙启发¹,王敏^1,3,张虎才^1,4,沈才明¹

（¹云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院，云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室，昆明 650500； ²中国科学院青藏高原研究所，高山生态与生物地理重点实验室，北京 100101； ³云南大学云南省古生物研究重点实验室，地球系统科学研究中心，昆明 650500； ⁴云南大学高原湖泊生态与治理研究院，昆明 650500）

出版日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2020-06-10

Environmental changes over the past 1200 years in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake, Central Yunnan.

YU Xiao-shan^1,2, MENG Hong-wei^1*, HUANG Lin-pei¹, SUN Qi-fa¹, WANG Min^1,3, ZHANG Hu-cai^1,4, SHEN Cai-ming¹

(¹Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Geographical Processes and Environmental Changes, School of Tourism and Geographical Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China; ²Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biogeography, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; ³Yunnan Key Laboratory of Earth System Science, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China; ⁴Institute of Plateau Lake Ecology and Management, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China).

Online:2020-06-10 Published:2020-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据滇中阳宗海78 cm沉积岩芯的花粉/炭屑分析，重建了阳宗海流域过去1200年的植被演替、气候变化和森林火灾史。岩芯年代框架的建立基于底部一个植物残体的AMS ¹⁴C测年和上部的²¹⁰Pb测年。结果表明：1) 阳宗海流域过去1200年的植被变化经历了4个阶段：暖干期（780—1630 AD）的植被以松栎混交林为主，草本植物少；凉湿期（1630—1860 AD）的植被仍以松栎混交林为主，但比重有所减少并存在明显波动，草本植物显著增加；冷干期（1860—1950 AD）和随后的暖干期（1950 AD之后）受人类活动干扰强烈，人类活动可能已成为影响植被的主导性因素。2）1200年以来，阳宗海流域气候变化存在明显的暖期（780—1630 AD）和冷期（1630—1950 AD），分别对应了中世纪暖期和小冰期，且水热条件配置呈现暖干冷湿的模式，与滇西天才湖、洱海和青藏高原东部等邻近区域较为同步。整个暖期气温波动不大，仅在最暖的12世纪中期到15世纪中期温度表现出较大的波动，小冰期存在两个气候波动阶段，分别是1630—1860 AD凉湿期和1860—1950 AD的冷干期。阳宗海流域气候变化的主导因素是太阳辐射强度，区域和全球性的海气耦合机制也是重要因素之一。3）1200年以来，阳宗海流域火灾频次呈现逐渐增高的趋势，与人口增长和人类活动不断增强呈现一致趋势，表明人类活动逐渐成为环境变化的重要驱动力之一。

关键词: 作物生长, 根系, 基因调控, 生物炭与化肥混施, 生物炭, 互作增效

Abstract: We carried out pollen/charcoal analyses on sediments of a 78cm core from Yangzonghai Lake to study vegetation succession, climatic change, and forest fire history over the past 1200 years in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake, central Yunnan. The age-depth framework was established using an AMS ¹⁴C dating of plant remnants at the bottom and ²¹⁰Pb dating at the top. The results showed that: (1) There were four stages of vegetation changes in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake over the past 1200: the first one was a warm and dry stage (780-1630 AD), when vegetation was dominated by mixed forest of pine and oak with few herbs; the second stage was a cool and wet stage (1630-1860 AD), when vegetation was still dominated the mixed forests of pine and oak, but with a decrease in the forest proportion and substantial fluctuations, and with a significant increase in herb proportion; it was followed by a cold and dry stage (1860-1950 AD) and the subsequent a warm and dry stage (after 1950 AD), when vegetation was strongly disturbed by human activities, which may have become the dominant factor driving vegetation. (2) Across the past 1200 years, a warm period (780-1630 AD) and a cold period (1630-1950 AD), corresponding to Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age respectively, occurred in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake. Moreover, the hydrothermal conditions showed a pattern of warm dry and coldwet, which occurred almost synchronously in the adjacent areas such as Tiancai Lake and Erhai Lake in northwest Yunnan and eastern Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. During the whole warm period, temperature was stable with a little bit more fluctuation in the warmest stage from the middle of the 12th century to the middle of the 15th century. Climate during the Little Ice Age showed two periods, namely a cool-wet period from 1630 to 1860 AD and cold-dry period from 1860 to 1950 AD. The dominant forcing of climate change over the past 1200 years in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake was solar forcing associated with regional and global ocean atmosphere coupling. (3) Forest fire increased gradually over the past 1200 years in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake, a trend consistent with population growth and human activities, indicating that human activities have gradually become one of the dominant driving forces of environmental change.

Key words: gene regulation, crop growth, combined application of biochar and fertilizer, biochar, synergistic effects., roots

余晓珊,蒙红卫,黄林培,孙启发,王敏,张虎才,沈才明. 滇中阳宗海流域过去1200年以来的环境变化[J]. 生态学杂志.

YU Xiao-shan, MENG Hong-wei, HUANG Lin-pei, SUN Qi-fa, WANG Min, ZHANG Hu-cai, SHEN Cai-ming. Environmental changes over the past 1200 years in the catchment of Yangzonghai Lake, Central Yunnan.[J]. cje.

[1]	杨明达, 张素瑜, 杨慎骄, 关小康, 李帅, 陈金平, 王同朝. 地下滴灌对冬小麦夏玉米根系吸水特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 469-479.
[2]	何至杭, 刘悦, 陶玉柱, 吴妙兰, 高畅, 王艺颖, 于耀泓, 周庆, 莫其锋. 降雨季节分配改变对热带次生林不同功能型幼苗根系形态特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 96-105.
[3]	刘源豪, 黄锦学, 王小南, 陈心怡, 裴蕴, 熊德成, 杨智杰. 大气增温对杉木幼树根系生物量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2100-2106.
[4]	陈利军, 林涛, 娄振帅, 汤秋香, 蒋平安, 宝哲, 习斌, 靳拓. 不同灌溉定额下地膜残留量对土壤物理性质及棉花根系生长的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2121-2128.
[5]	包正荣, 戴皖宁, 苏旭, 陈义轩, 林利, 兰宇, 杨旭, 孟军. 九年低量生物炭还田和钾肥对棕壤土钾素、玉米产量和钾平衡的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2129-2137.
[6]	李露航, 类延宝, 陈秋捷, 邓先智, 包寒阳, 扎琼巴让, 孙庚. 若尔盖高寒沙化草地恢复过程中土壤全碳和植物根系特征的变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 282-290.
[7]	吴云鹏, 曾庆军, 陈平山, 欧阳晓芳, 胡继业, 冯春华, 孙健. 铁基生物炭联合生物电化学原位修复Pb-多环芳烃复合污染底泥的效果与机理 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 504-512.
[8]	罗美凤, 黄平, 王小晓, 易雪梅, 吴胜军. 消落区植物群落对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2314-2326.
[9]	刘丽君, 朱启林, 何秋香, 张雪彬, 刘金霞, 曹明, 孟磊, 柯用春. 添加秸秆和生物炭土壤N₂O排放对温度的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1501-1508.
[10]	刘赛男, 杜慧婷, 黄玉威, 兰宇, 卢敬坤, 王思宇, 孟军. 生物炭与解磷菌配合施用对磷胁迫水稻苗期生长及根际磷素有效性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1560-1569.
[11]	王宣茗, 王丽学, 苏旭, 祝晓妍, 姜展博, 高欢. 生物炭陈化对玉米产量及土壤水肥的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1570-1579.
[12]	兰宇, 姬丽, 贾彪, 魏雪, 翟勇全, 运彬媛, 马健祯. 基于根系生物量的宁夏滴灌玉米临界氮稀释曲线构建 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1448-1456.
[13]	杨慧琴, 何思, 张金彪. 缓解植物铝毒害的相关基因调控研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1213-1220.
[14]	高歌, 李正才, 葛晓改, 黄润霞, 李爱博. 施氮对干旱胁迫下毛竹幼苗生物量和根系形态的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(5): 858-864.
[15]	白志勇, 任可心, 陈梦雨, 苟永祥, 许航, 陈兰英, 肖娟. N沉降下川中丘陵地区柏树人工林根系分泌物特征及其介导的根际C、N转化过程 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(3): 454-464.