生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田水稻产量和经济效益的影响

生态学杂志

生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田水稻产量和经济效益的影响

周旋^1,2,吴良欢^1,2*,戴锋³

（¹教育部环境修复与生态健康重点实验室，浙江大学环境与资源学院，杭州 310058； ²浙江省农业资源与环境重点实验室，浙江大学环境与资源学院，杭州 310058； ³浙江奥复托化工有限公司，浙江上虞 312300）

出版日期:2017-12-10 发布日期:2017-12-10

Effects of biochemical inhibitor combination and fertilization mode on rice yield and economic benefit in yellow clayey field.

ZHOU Xuan^1,2, WU Liang-huan^1,2*, DAI Feng^3#br#

(¹Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecosystem Health, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; ²Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; ³Zhejiang Aofutuo Chemical Co. Ltd., Shangyu 312300, Zhejiang, China).

Online:2017-12-10 Published:2017-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 施用脲酶/硝化抑制剂可以有效调控土壤氮素转化，减少氮素损失，提高作物氮肥利用率。采用二因素随机区组设计，研究生化抑制剂组合(NBPT/NPPT+CP)与施肥模式（一次性和分次施肥）互作对黄泥田水稻产量、产量构成因素和经济效益的影响。结果表明：生化抑制剂组合和施肥模式分别对黄泥田水稻产量和经济效益的影响极显著 (P<0.001)，其交互效应不显著(P>0.05)；尿素分次施用（U3）处理水稻产量和经济效益较一次性施用（U）处理分别显著提高14.2%和14.6% (P<0.05)；与U处理相比，U+NBPT、U+NPPT、U+CP、U+NBPT+CP、U+NPPT+CP处理产量分别显著提高22.8%、22.2%、20.1%、24.1%、25.8%(P<0.05)，经济效益分别显著提高25.2%、24.6%、22.2%、26.2%、28.1%(P<0.05)；与U3处理相比，U3+NBPT、U3+NPPT、U3+CP、U3+NBPT+CP、U3+NPPT+CP处理产量分别显著提高10.8%、13.5%、12.8%、12.0%、15.8%(P<0.05)，经济效益分别显著提高11.7%、14.7%、14.0%、12.6%、16.8%(P<0.05)；新型脲酶抑制剂NPPT单独施用及与CP配施的田间水稻增产效果与NBPT相似。通径分析表明，一次性施肥对水稻产量的直接效应顺序为千粒重(0.460）>有效穗数（0.436）> 每穗粒数（0.385），分次施肥顺序为有效穗数（1.040）> 每穗粒数（0.304）> 千粒重（-0.059）。总之，黄泥田水稻施肥添加抑制剂可以有效扩充籽粒库容，提高产量，获得较高收益，结合不同施肥模式能进一步提高作物品种的增产潜力。

关键词: 氟, 电解铝, 排放清单, 土壤

Abstract: Application of urease inhibitor/nitrification inhibitor can effectively control soil nitrogen (N) transformation, reduce N loss, and improve N use efficiency of crops. In this study, an experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of biochemical inhibitors (NBPT/NPPT+CP) combined with fertilization mode (once or three times) and their interactions on rice yield, yield components, and economic benefit in yellow clayey field using two factor randomized block design. The results showed that biochemical inhibitor combination and fertilization mode had significant effects on rice yield and economic benefit (P<0.001), whereas their interaction effect was not significant (P>0.05). Three time urea fertilization treatment (U3) significantly increased grain yield and economic benefit by 14.2% and 14.6% (P<0.05), respectively, compared to once fertilization treatment (U). Compared with U treatment, U+NBPT, U+NPPT, U+CP, U+NBPT+CP, U+NPPT+CP treatments significantly increased rice yield by 22.8%, 22.2%, 20.1%, 24.1% and 25.8% (P<0.05), and economic benefit by 25.2%, 24.6%, 22.2%, 26.2% and 28.1% (P<0.05), respectively. Compared with U3 treatment, U3+NBPT, U3+NPPT, U3+CP, U3+NBPT+CP, U3+NPPT+CP treatments significantly increased rice yield by 10.8%, 13.5%, 12.8%, 12.0% and 15.8% (P<0.05), and economic benefit by 11.7%, 14.7%, 14.0%, 12.6% and 16.8% (P<0.05), respectively. Addition of a newtype urease inhibitor NPPT alone or combined with CP had a yieldincreasing effect similar to that of NBPT. Path analysis showed that the direct effect of once fertilization on rice yield ranked as 1000-grain weight (0.460)>effective panicles (0.436) >grains per panicle (0.385); three-time fertilization ranked as effective panicles (1.040)>grains per panicle (0.304)>1000 grain weight (-0.059). In conclusion, fertilization plus inhibitor application can effectively enhance the grain sink and increase rice production with better income in yellow clayey field, and can further improve the production potential of crop varieties when combined with a suitable fertilization mode.

Key words: emission list, fluorine, soil., electrolytic aluminum

周旋,吴良欢,戴锋. 生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田水稻产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 生态学杂志.

ZHOU Xuan, WU Liang-huan, DAI Feng. Effects of biochemical inhibitor combination and fertilization mode on rice yield and economic benefit in yellow clayey field.[J]. cje.

[1]	孙龙, 胡春雨, 胡同欣. 计划火烧对红松人工林细根生物量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 362-371.
[2]	胡同欣, 丁海磊, 孙龙. 火干扰对森林土壤氮素循环与转化的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 372-382.
[3]	蔺兴武, 朱建国, 谢祖彬. 吉林蛟河不同演替阶段温带针阔混交林土壤质量演变 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 433-444.
[4]	张建彤, 马建涛, 柴雨葳, 吴炳权, 王彦萍, 韩凡香, 程宏波, 常磊, 柴守玺. 秸秆带状覆盖对旱地马铃薯土壤温度及产量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 461-468.
[5]	冯蒙蒙, 林永新, 贺子洋, 樊剑波, 贺纪正. 土壤含水量和氮添加对旱地红壤氨氧化微生物功能基因丰度的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 480-486.
[6]	郭晓宇, 程曼, 徐茂宏, 何新华, 文永莉. 不同坡向亚高山草甸土壤有机碳光降解特征及其对铁添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 33-40.
[7]	史嘉炜, 廖家强, 魏春雪, 彭逸飞, 李婷婷, 胡健, 汪金松, 周青平. 高寒草甸土壤呼吸及其组分对氮添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 41-49.
[8]	郭海宁, 刘美君, 杜盛. 降雨减少对刺槐树干液流特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 122-130.
[9]	邹佳何, 王海燕, 李成铭, 崔雪, 赵晗, 陈悦, 董齐琪, 侯文宁. 长白山北坡不同林分类型细根-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 170-177.
[10]	索炎炎, 张翔, 吴士文, 司贤宗, 李亮, 徐凤丹, 程培军, 李倩. 豫南夏花生种植区土壤pH时空演变及其驱动力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 188-196.
[11]	赵晗, 王海燕, 胡兴国, 雷相东, 杜雪, 邹佳何, 崔雪. 基于结构方程的云冷杉阔叶混交林土壤有机碳影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 264-272.
[12]	隋鹏祥, 廉宏利, 王峥宇, 姜英, 齐华, 罗洋, 郑金玉. 旋耕和秸秆还田方式对棕壤微生物群落特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2049-2060.
[13]	丁翊东, 李素丽, 张芸, 徐佳文, 吴盼盼, 毛瑢. 亚热带人工林不同植物生长型凋落叶溶解性有机质数量和光谱学特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2081-2090.
[14]	陈利军, 林涛, 娄振帅, 汤秋香, 蒋平安, 宝哲, 习斌, 靳拓. 不同灌溉定额下地膜残留量对土壤物理性质及棉花根系生长的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2121-2128.
[15]	包正荣, 戴皖宁, 苏旭, 陈义轩, 林利, 兰宇, 杨旭, 孟军. 九年低量生物炭还田和钾肥对棕壤土钾素、玉米产量和钾平衡的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2129-2137.