七种蒿属植物种子重量形状及萌发特性的比较研究

生态学杂志 ›› 2004, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 57-60.

七种蒿属植物种子重量形状及萌发特性的比较研究

李雪华^1,2, 刘志民¹, 蒋德明¹, 李晓兰^1,2, 阎巧玲^1,2

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳, 110016;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100039

收稿日期:2004-04-06 修回日期:2004-05-18 出版日期:2004-10-10
通讯作者: 李雪华,女,1973年生,在职博士,助理研究员.主要从事植物水分生理和植物生态学研究,发表论文7篇,参编专著1部.
基金资助:
中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所领域前沿创新资助项目(C12SJ-SLYQY0406-506)

A comparative study on seed weight,shape and germination characteristics of 7 Artemisia species

LI Xuehua^1,2, LIU Zhimin¹, JIANG Deming¹, LI Xiaolan^1,2, YAN Qiaoling^1,2

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China

Received:2004-04-06 Revised:2004-05-18 Online:2004-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在实验室条件下,对7种蒿属植物种子(差巴嘎蒿、乌丹蒿、万年蒿、大籽蒿、黄蒿、野艾蒿和冷蒿)进行重量、形状及萌发特性的比较研究。沙生先锋植物乌丹蒿和差巴嘎蒿的种子重量较大、形状扁平,这些特征是植物对流沙环境进化的适应机制之一。黄蒿种子小且呈圆形,具有持久土壤种子库,因此黄蒿抗干扰能力较强。7种蒿属植物有3种萌发格局:大籽蒿、万年蒿、差巴嘎蒿和冷蒿的萌发前期快,后期平缓;野艾蒿和黄蒿整个萌发过程平缓;乌丹蒿早期和后期萌发平缓,中间快。乌丹蒿推迟萌发高峰是它比差巴嘎蒿更适应流沙环境的机制之一。从种子萌发格局分析,黄蒿种子具有生理后熟或休眠机制,大籽蒿种子萌发是典型的机会主义。黄蒿、野艾蒿和冷蒿种子具有风险分摊的萌发机制。种子重量和形状与发芽率之间无相关性,重量和形状则显著相关。

关键词: ComGIS, 景观格局, 景观监测, 管理信息系统

Abstract: A laboratory study was made on seed weight,shape and germination characteristics of 7 Artemisia species (A.halodendron,A.wudanica,A.sacrorum,A.sieversiana,A.scoparia,A. lavandulaefolia Afrigida).Seeds of A.wudanica and A.halodendron,pioneer species in sandy land,were big and not round,which was one of the mechnisms of species adapted to drift sand.Seed of A.scoporia was small and round,which means that this species perhaps has the persistent soil seed bank,which explained the reason that A.scoporia has more strong anti-disturbing ability.There were 3 germination patterns of 7 Artemisia species: germination pattern of A.sieversiana,A.sacrorum,A.halodendron and A.frigida were rapid in the early stage and slow in the later stage,respectively.A.lavandulaefolia and A.scoparia were slow in the whole germination course.A.wudanica was slow in the early and later stages,but rapid in the middle stage.A.wudanica delayed the peak emergence of germination rate,which was its mechnism of more adaptablity in drift land than A.halodendron.Accordirg to the germination pattern,seed dormancy or post-mature was the strategy of in A.scoporia,while opportunism was the strategy of A.sieversiana.Germination of A.scoparia,A.lavandulaefolia and A.frigida had the mechanism of share survival risks.Seed weight and shape had no relationship to the germination percentage.But seed weight was significantly positively related to seed shape.

Key words: ComGIS, Landscape pattern, Landscape monitoring, Management information system

中图分类号:

Q948.1

李雪华, 刘志民, 蒋德明, 李晓兰, 阎巧玲. 七种蒿属植物种子重量形状及萌发特性的比较研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, (5): 57-60.

LI Xuehua, LIU Zhimin, JIANG Deming, LI Xiaolan, YAN Qiaoling. A comparative study on seed weight,shape and germination characteristics of 7 Artemisia species[J]. cje, 2004, (5): 57-60.

参考文献

[1] 马骥,李俊祯,孔红.2002.我国沙区6种蒿属植物的种子微形态特征[J].中国沙漠,22(6):586～590.
[2] 王学敏,易津.2003.驼绒藜属植物种子萌发条件及其生理特性的研究[J].草地学报,11(2):95～102.
[3] 王宗灵,徐雨清,王刚.1998.沙区有限降雨制约下一年生植物种子萌发与生存对策[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),34(2):98～103.
[4] 刘志民,蒋德明,高红瑛.2003.植物生活史繁殖对策与干扰关系的研究[J].应用生态学报,14(3):418～422.
[5] 刘志民,李雪华,李荣平,等.2003科尔沁沙地70种植物繁殖体形状比较研究[J].应用生态学报,12(5):55～61.
[6] 刘中民,吴佐祺,杨喜林.1963.几种沙生植物特性和种植的研究,流沙治理研究(第5版)[M].北京:科学出版社.
[7] 刘瑛心.1985.内蒙古沙漠植物志(第3卷)[M].北京:科学出版社.
[8] 苏德毕力格,李永宏,雍世鹏,等.2000.冷蒿草原可萌发土壤种子库特征及其对放牧的响应[J].生态学报,20(1):43～48.
[9] 赵文智,白四明.2001.科尔沁沙地围封草场土壤种子库特征[J].中国沙漠,21(2)204～208.
[10] Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Grandin U, et al. 1998. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity [J]. Funct. Ecol., 12:834～842.
[11] Bungard RA, Daly GT, Mcneil DL, et al. 1997. Clematis vitalba in a New Zealand native forest remnant: Does seed germination explain distribution[J ] ? New Zealand J . Bot., 35: 525～534.
[12] Grime JP, Mason G, Curtis AV, et al. 1981. A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flore[J]. J. Ecol., 69:1017～1059.
[13] Grime JP. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties [ M]. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
[14] Huang Zhenying, Zhenghai Hu, Yitzchak Gutterman. 2000. Structure and function of mucilaginous achenes of Artemisia monosperma from the Negev Desert of Israd and Artemisia sphaerocephala from the Mu-Us Desert of China[J]. Israel J. Plant Sci., 48:255～266.
[15] Hulme PE. 1994. Post-dispersal seed predation in grassl and-Its magnitude and source of variation[ J ]. J. Ecol., 82: 645～652.
[16] Jun R, Ling T. 2003. Effect of hydration-dehydration cycles on germination of seven Calligonum species[J]. J. Arid Envir.,55:111～122.
[17] Sachiko A, Izumi W. 2000. Seed dormancy/germination traits of seven Persicaria species and their implication in soil seed-bank strategy[ J ]. Ecol. Res., 15: 33～46.
[18] Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG. 1993. Seed size and shape predict persistence in the soil[J]. Funct. Ecol., 7:236～241.
[19] Thompson K, Grime JP. 1996. Seasonal variation in the seed bank of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats [ J ]. J.Ecol., 67:893～921.
[20] Venable DL. 1992. Size-number trade-offs and the variation of seed with plant resource status[J]. Amer. Nat., 140: 287～304.
[21] Washitani I, Takenaka A, Kuramoto N, et al. 1997. Aster kantoensis Kitam., an endangered flood plain endemic plant in Japan: Its ability to form persistent soil seed-banks[J]. Biol.Conser., 82:67～72.