欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3915-3922.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202512.018

• 外来生物入侵专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

牧草多样性及群落抚育时间对牧草抵抗薇甘菊入侵的影响

黄晶晶1,2,王豪2,韩爱衍1,2,黄乔乔2*   

  1. 1海南大学热带农林学院, 海南儋州 571737; 2农业农村部热带作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 中国热带农业科学院环境与植物保护研究所, 海口 571101)

  • 出版日期:2025-12-10 发布日期:2025-12-04

The influence of species diversity and community nurturing time on the resistance of forage grasses to Mikania micrantha invasion.

HUANG Jingjing1,2, WANG Hao2, HAN Aiyan1,2, HUANG Qiaoqiao2*   

  1. (1Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou 571737, Hainan, China; 2Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China).

  • Online:2025-12-10 Published:2025-12-04

摘要: 薇甘菊(Mikania micrantha)在华南地区造成严重危害。利用植物替代控制可降低其危害并获得生态和经济效益。本研究以多年生牧草紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)、杂三叶(Trifolium hybridum)、柱花草(Stylosanthes guianensias)、黑麦草(Lolium perenne)和鸭茅(Dactylis glomerata)为实验材料,研究牧草多样性、群落抚育时间对牧草抵抗薇甘菊入侵的影响。结果表明,当薇甘菊和牧草同时生长时,牧草群落对薇甘菊的控制效果较差。当薇甘菊入侵成熟牧草群落(抚育近4个月)时,牧草多样性的增加导致薇甘菊生物量的降低,但差异并不显著。此外,对于接种无薇甘菊驯化的土壤时,牧草多样性的增加可通过土壤遗留效应促进薇甘菊和牧草的单独生长。进一步分析表明,牧草与薇甘菊地上生物量间存在负相关关系,且当薇甘菊入侵成熟牧草群落时,这种负相关关系极强,表明生物量大的成熟牧草群落更能有效抑制薇甘菊。对于成熟牧草群落,包含柱花草的群落地上生物量为75.16~162.2 g·pot-1,而不包含柱花草的群落地上生物量为0.2~15.66 g·pot-1。因此,将柱花草单独种植或与其他牧草混种,并将群落抚育一段时期后(近4个月)可有效抵抗薇甘菊的入侵。


关键词: 薇甘菊, 入侵抵抗力, 牧草, 多样性, 替代控制

Abstract: Mikania micrantha, an invasive plant species, causes significant harm in South China. Utilizing plant replacement control can mitigate the detrimental effects of invasive species and yield ecological and economic benefits. We examined the effect of species diversity and community nurturing time on resistance of five forage grass species to M. micrantha invasion, including Medicago sativa, Trifolium hybridum, Stylosanthes guianensias, Lolium perenne, and Dactylis glomerata. The results showed that when M. micrantha and forage grasses grew simultaneously, the forage grass communities had poor control over M. micrantha. When M. micrantha invaded mature forage grass communities (nearly 4 months of nurturing), an increase in forage grass diversity resulted in a decrease in M. micrantha biomass, but the difference was not statistically significant. When inoculated with soils without M. micrantha conditioning, an increase in forage grass diversity increased the individual growth of M. micrantha and forage grasses through soil legacy effect. Biomass of forage grasses was negatively related with that of M. micrantha, and this relationship was particularly strong when M. micrantha invaded mature forage grass communities, indicating that mature forage grass communities with substantial biomass could effectively suppress M. micrantha. Aboveground biomass of mature forage grass communities containing S. guianensias ranged from 75.16 to 162.2 g per pot, but that without S. guianensias ranged from 0.2 to 15.66 g per pot. Therefore, planting S. guianensias either alone or in combination with other forage grass species and nurturing these communities for a period of time (nearly 4 months) can effectively resist M. micrantha invasion.


Key words: Mikania micrantha, invasion resistance, forage grass, diversity, replacement control