生态恢复背景下非辐射效应主导的黄土高原生长季地表温度变化

doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202106.029

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 1820-1829.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202106.029

生态恢复背景下非辐射效应主导的黄土高原生长季地表温度变化

孙舒轻¹,严建武^1,2*,梁伟^1,2,张为彬¹,王凤娇¹,符淑宜²,苟芬¹

（¹陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院，西安 710119； ²陕西师范大学地理国家级实验教学示范中心，西安 710119）

出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-12-10

Non-radiative effect dominates surface temperature changes on the Loess Plateau during the growing season under the background of ecological restoration.

SUN Shu-qing¹, YAN Jian-wu^1,2*, LIANG Wei^1,2, ZHANG Wei-bin¹, WANG Feng-jiao¹, FU Shu-yi², GOU Fen¹

(¹Schoolof Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China; ²NationalDemonstration Center for Experimental Geography Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China).

Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为人类活动影响气候变化的重要因素之一，土地利用主要通过改变地表生物地球物理过程和生物地球化学过程来影响气候系统。土地利用通过生物地球化学过程对气候系统的影响已得到广泛和深入研究，但对生物地球物理过程认识仍不足，这不利于区域气候的准确评估。本研究针对经历过大规模高强度人类活动的黄土高原地区，利用地表辐射能量数据，在明确2000—2015年耕地转移情况的基础上，量化了耕地和林草地的生物地球物理差异，然后结合能量再分配因子估算了退耕还林还草的辐射和非辐射效应，最后利用非辐射效应指数（NRFI）量化了地表温度变化中非辐射效应的贡献率。结果表明：土地利用变化对地表温度变化影响的辐射效应表现为增温效应（0.05 ℃），非辐射效应表现为降温效应（0.21 ℃），非辐射效应占主导；在研究期间，生长季地表温度下降了0.17 ℃，非辐射效应贡献率为69.7%；地表温度变化对能量再分配因子、地表反照率和土壤热通量等敏感性不同，其中，能量再分配因子对地表温度的变化起决定性作用，使得生长季地表温度下降了0.21 ℃。本研究不仅为准确评估土地利用变化对区域气候影响提供理论依据，也对黄土高原地区应对或减缓气候变化的影响具有重要意义。

关键词: 黄土高原, 土地利用变化, 地表温度, 退耕还林还草, 生物物理效应

Abstract: As one of the important factors affecting climate change by human activities, land use changes mainly affect climate system by changing the surface biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes. The impacts of land use change on climate system through biogeochemical processes have been extensively examined, but the understanding of biogeophysical processes is still insufficient, which is not conducive to accurate assessment of regional climate. This study focused on the Loess Plateau that has witnessed largescale and highintensity human activities. Based on the surface radiation energy data, the transfer of cropland from 2000 to 2015 was defined. The biogeophysical differences between cropland, forest, and grassland were quantified. Combined with the energy redistribution factor, the radiative and nonradiative effects of returning cropland to forest and grassland were estimated. Finally, we used the nonradiative forcing index (NRFI) to quantify the contribution of the nonradiative effect to the changes of land surface temperature. Our results showed that land use change caused 0.05 ℃ warming through the radiative effect and 0.21 ℃ cooling through the nonradiative effect on local surface temperature change. The nonradiative effect dominated responses of local temperature to land use change. During the study period, land surface temperature in the growing season dropped by 0.17 ℃ and the contribution of nonradiative effects was 69.7%. Surface temperature changes showed different sensitivity to energy redistribution factors, surface albedo, and soil heat flux. The energy redistribution factor dominated the land surface temperature change and reduced the surface temperature in the growing season by 0.21 ℃. Our results provide a theoretical basis for accurately assessing the influence of land use changes on regional climate and have implications for coping with or mitigating the impacts of climate change in the Loess Plateau.

Key words: Loess Plateau, land use change, land surface temperature, The Grain to Green Program, biophysical effect.

孙舒轻, 严建武, 梁伟, 张为彬, 王凤娇, 符淑宜, 苟芬. 生态恢复背景下非辐射效应主导的黄土高原生长季地表温度变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(6): 1820-1829.

SUN Shu-qing, YAN Jian-wu, LIANG Wei, ZHANG Wei-bin, WANG Feng-jiao, FU Shu-yi, GOU Fen. Non-radiative effect dominates surface temperature changes on the Loess Plateau during the growing season under the background of ecological restoration.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(6): 1820-1829.

[1]	杨涛, 党国锋. 基于耦合协调度模型的黄土高原生态环境质量测度及预测 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 851-860.
[2]	张沁, 张守平, 杨清伟. 重庆市悦来新城土地利用/覆被变化对地表温度的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 206-215.
[3]	胡露, 冯彬, 白文科, 董鑫, 肖强, 张晋东, 黄尤优, 周材权. 四川大熊猫保护地生境质量时空演变特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2204-2211.
[4]	乔斌, 颜玉倩, 张婷华, 李秀阳, 张睿, 李晓东, 李甫, 李素雲, 祝存兄, 周秉荣. 基于土地利用变化的西宁市景观生态风险识别及优化策略 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 2020-2031.
[5]	袁峰, 陈存友, 胡希军, 周冬梅, 刘路云. 景观特征对水体热缓释效应的影响及其效率阈值 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1739-1748.
[6]	WANG Jincheng, JING Mingbo, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Gaosen, ZHANG Binglin, LIU Guangxiu. 黑心菊(Rudbeckia hirta)对陇东黄土高原油污土壤植物修复效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 933-945.
[7]	于航, 金磊, 谭炳香, 戚曌, 沈明潭, 牟少华. 黄土高原退耕还林生态服务权衡协同分析——以安塞县为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 544-551.
[8]	王婧姝, 毕如田, 贺鹏, 徐立帅, 刘正春, 曹晨斌. 气候变化下黄土高原植被生长期NDVI动态变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(1): 67-76.
[9]	郭彦君, 郭文炯. “三生空间”视角下山西中部盆地城市群景观生态风险分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1813-1824.
[10]	李姣, 汪杰, 李朗, 周翠烟, 牛潜, 张灿明. 洞庭湖生态经济区土地利用变化对碳储量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1156-1165.
[11]	王楠, 黄菁华, 霍娜, 耿德洲, 杨盼盼, 张欣玥, 赵世伟. 黄土高原半干旱区不同林龄柠条人工林土壤线虫群落特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(2): 236-245.
[12]	钟融, 任永康, 王培如, 林文, 任爱霞, 孙敏, 高志强, 徐隽铭. 晋南地区冬小麦生育期气候变化特征及其对产量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 81-89.
[13]	李晓雅, 赵成章, 曾红霞, 色拥军, 李群, 马敏. 党河源区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9): 2904-2913.
[14]	伍娬, 王志杰. 喀斯特山地城市内山体绿地对城市热岛的减温效应——以安顺市西秀区为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3): 855-863.
[15]	张晓瑶, 陆林, 虞虎, 张潇, 李冬花. 青藏高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响的多情景模拟 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3): 887-898.

生态恢复背景下非辐射效应主导的黄土高原生长季地表温度变化

Non-radiative effect dominates surface temperature changes on the Loess Plateau during the growing season under the background of ecological restoration.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价