欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 93-102.doi: : 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202101.007

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州草海岩溶湿地水体不同形态氮的时空分布特征

杨诗笛,曹星星*,吴攀,刘闪,廖家豪   

  1. (贵州大学资源与环境工程学院, 贵州大学喀斯特地质资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 贵阳 550025)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-10 发布日期:2021-06-10

Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of different forms of nitrogen in karst wetland in Caohai, Guizhou.

YANG Shi-di, CAO Xing-xing*, WU Pan, LIU Shan, LIAO Jia-hao#br#   

  1. (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Key Laboratory of Karst Geological Resources and Environment Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China).
  • Online:2021-01-10 Published:2021-06-10

摘要: 为揭示贵州草海岩溶湿地水体中不同形态氮时空分布特征及其变化规律,通过网格布点法采集了该湿地丰、枯水期表层水,并对其不同形态溶解性氮含量进行了测定,运用ArcGIS统计模块分析了草海不同形态氮的时空分布特征,并分析了各形态氮与环境因子之间的相关性。结果表明:草海水体丰、枯水期TN的平均含量分别为(0.96±0.52)、(0.90±0.71) mg·L-1,总体表现呈丰水期高于枯水期;丰水期氮形态以无机氮为主,NH4+-N与NO3--N之和占比总氮的54%,二者平均含量分别为(0.14±0.08)、(0.38±0.56) mg·L-1,这两种形态氮的高值区均分布在西侧区域,主要受外源输入影响;而枯水期氮形态以有机氮为主,DON占比TN的49%,平均含量为(0.44±0.26) mg·L-1,高值区出现在南侧区域,枯水期草海补给水量减少,加之水生生物的衰亡以及沉积物中氮的释放,使得该时期水体氮素主要通过湖泊内源进行释放转化。草海水体氮形态分布的季节性差异主要受水环境变化、外源氮输入以及内源氮释放的共同影响,丰水期应加强草海西部地区3条入湖河流的污染控制,而枯水期应主要控制湖内沉积物氮素的释放,进而有效降低草海水体中氮含量。

关键词: 草海, 岩溶湿地, 氮形态, 时空分布, 环境因子

Abstract: To explore the spatiotemporal distribution and variation characteristics of different forms of nitrogen in karst wetland of Caohai, Guizhou Province, we collected surface water samples in wet and dry seasons using a grid distribution method, and measured the concentrations of dissolved nitrogen with different forms. The spatial and temporal distribution of the different nitrogen forms were analyzed by using ArcGIS statistical module. The correlation between various forms of nitrogen and environmental factors was analyzed. The results showed that the average concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) in Caohai were (0.96±0.52) mg·L-1 in the wet season and (0.90±0.71) mg·L-1 in the dry season, with higher concentrations of TN in the wet period. Moreover, inorganic nitrogen was predominant in the wet period. The sum of NH4+-N and NO3--N accounted for 54% of TN, with an average concentration of (0.14±0.08) and (0.38±0.56) mg·L-1, respectively. The high values of these two forms of nitrogen were distributed in the west area, which was mainly affected by external import. In the dry season, organic nitrogen was the main form. The dissolved organic nitrogen accounted for 49% of TN, with an average concentration of (0.44±0.26) mg L-1. Furthermore, the high value area appeared in the south area, as the water supply of Caohai decreased in the dry season, coupled with the decline of aquatic organisms and nitrogen release in sediments, which contributed to the release and transformation of nitrogen in water body. Therefore, the seasonal variation of nitrogen forms in Caohai Lake was mainly affected by water environmental changes, exogenous nitrogen input, and endogenous nitrogen release. Pollution control in three rivers entering the lake in Western Caohai should be strengthened in the wet season, while nitrogen release in lake sediments should be controlled in the dry season, to effectively reduce nitrogen concentration in water body of Caohai.

Key words: Caohai Lake, karst wetland, nitrogen form, spatiotemporal distribution, environmental factor.