基于Ecopath模型的胶州湾生态系统结构和能量流动分析

生态学杂志

基于Ecopath模型的胶州湾生态系统结构和能量流动分析

马孟磊^1,2,陈作志^1*,许友伟¹,张魁¹,袁伟³,徐姗楠¹

（¹中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所，农业部外海渔业开发重点实验室，广州 510300；²上海海洋大学海洋科学学院，上海 201306； ³中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所，青岛 266071）

出版日期:2018-02-10 发布日期:2018-02-10

Analysis of structure and energy flow in Jiaozhou Bay ecosystem based on Ecopath model.

MA Meng-lei^1,2, CHEN Zuo-zhi^1*, XU You-wei¹, ZHANG Kui¹, YUAN Wei³, XU Shan-nan¹

(¹Key Laboratory of OpenSea Fishery Development, Ministry of Agriculture; South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, China; ²College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; ³Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China).

Online:2018-02-10 Published:2018-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据2015—2016年在胶州湾进行的渔业资源与生态环境调查数据，利用Ecopath with Ecosim 6.5（EwE）软件构建了胶州湾生态通道模型，分析了现阶段该海湾生态系统营养结构、能量流动过程和生态系统总特征。结果表明：胶州湾生态通道模型共由21个功能组组成，各功能组营养级范围为1～4.383，渔获物平均营养级为2.023，以菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)为主；胶州湾生态系统的能量流动主要以牧食食物链为主，占系统能量来源的59%。生态网络分析表明：系统能量主要分布在6个营养级，来源于初级生产者的能量转化效率为16.22%，来自碎屑的转化效率为15.76%，系统平均转化效率16.35%。胶州湾生态系统总初级生产力与总呼吸量的比值为2.518，系统处于不成熟状态。

关键词: 建设用地, 建筑容量, 碳汇量, 核算方法, 碳封存

Abstract:

Based on the survey data of fishery resources and ecological environment in the Jiaozhou Bay during 2015-2016, we developed a mass-balance model using Ecopath with Ecosim software for the Jiaozhou Bay. Using the Ecopath model, we evaluated the trophic structure,energy flow and ecosystem characters of the Jiaozhou Bay. The Jiaozhou Bay model consisted of 21 functional groups, and the fractional trophic levels ranged from 1 to 4.383. The mean trophic level of fishery catches in the Jiaozhou Bay ecosystem was 2.023, dominated by Manila Clam (Ruditapes philippinarum). The energy flow of the Jiaozhou Bay ecosystem was mainly dominated by grazing food chain, which accounted for 59% of the energy source. Using network analysis, the system network was mapped into a linear food chain and six discrete trophic levels were found with a mean transfer efficiency of 16.35%, 16.22% from primary producer and 15.76% from detritus within the ecosystem. In addition, the ratio of total primary production/total respiration (TPP/TR) was 2.518, suggesting that the Jiaozhou Bay ecosystem was in an immature state.

Key words: building capacity, carbon sink, construction land, accounting method, carbon sequestration

马孟磊,陈作志,许友伟,张魁,袁伟,徐姗楠. 基于Ecopath模型的胶州湾生态系统结构和能量流动分析[J]. 生态学杂志.

MA Meng-lei, CHEN Zuo-zhi, XU You-wei, ZHANG Kui, YUAN Wei, XU Shan-nan. Analysis of structure and energy flow in Jiaozhou Bay ecosystem based on Ecopath model.[J]. cje.

[1]	徐思若, 成志影, 那雪迎, 张栩嘉, 马大龙, 张鹏. 黑龙江省森林碳汇及其经济价值的变化分析与潜力预测 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 197-205.
[2]	王旭熙, 彭立, 刘守江, 魏芸云. 中国西南山区城市建设用地扩张特征及其驱动机制 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9): 2895-2903.
[3]	葛媛媛,韩磊,赵永华,奥勇,丁娟,朱莹莹,刘冰. 1984—2016年西安市城市扩张时空度量分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5): 1491-1499.
[4]	陈喜东,石培基,王川,岳晓新,刘骁啸,张文敏. 不同情景下河谷型城市建设用地扩张的景观生态格局响应——以兰州市为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(11): 3381-3389.
[5]	周健,肖荣波**,庄长伟,邓一荣. 城市森林碳汇及其核算方法研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3368-3377.
[6]	李平星**. 广西西江经济带生态重要性分区及其与建设用地的空间叠置关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10): 2651-2656.
[7]	雷雅凯1,闫峰1,张军红1,贺丹2,田国行3**,孙华4. 郑州市建设用地景观格局变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(07): 1839-1845.