黄土丘陵区藓结皮优势种形态结构差异

生态学杂志

黄土丘陵区藓结皮优势种形态结构差异

杨雪伟^1,2,赵允格²,许明祥^2*

（¹西北农林科技大学林学院，陕西杨凌 712100； ²西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所，黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室，陕西杨凌 712100）

出版日期:2016-02-10 发布日期:2016-02-10

Variation of morphological structure of dominant species in moss crusts in hilly Loess Plateau region. 

YANG Xue-wei^1,2, ZHAO Yun-ge², XU Ming-xiang^2*

(¹College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; ^2State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China)

Online:2016-02-10 Published:2016-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 藓结皮对黄土丘陵区生态修复与重建有重要意义。以黄土丘陵区藓结皮优势种土生对齿藓（Didymodon vinealis （Brid.）Zand.）、短叶对齿藓（Didymodon tectorum （C. Mull.） Saito）、扭口藓（Barbula unguiculata Hedw.）和银叶真藓（Bryum argenteum Hedw.）为研究对象，通过形态解剖结构观察分析，研究了4个藓种形态结构差异。结果表明：土生对齿藓株高（6.1 mm）、茎直径（298.6 μm）、中肋宽（65.5 μm）以及叶宽（590.9 μm）、叶片厚度（14.8 μm）显著高于其他3个藓种，茎表皮细胞壁增厚且皮部细胞镶嵌排列；短叶对齿藓株高、茎、叶片及毛尖结构无显著优势；土生对齿藓茎和叶片结构粗壮，适应水分变异性大的环境，耐旱能力强；扭口藓叶片长度（3.2 mm）和叶片下部细胞面积（191.2 μm²）显著大于其他3种藓类并含有大量叶绿体，中肋深陷呈“v”型，适宜水分充足环境，集水能力强但耐干性弱；银叶真藓茎皮部细胞面积987.8 μm²，单个皮部细胞面积占茎横切面积的3.1%，毛尖长度（274 μm）显著大于其他3个藓种且叶片上部细胞与毛尖呈透明状，耐旱并抵御强光辐射。以上结果表明，黄土丘陵区4个藓种的茎叶形态结构存在差异，适应水分、光照条件不同，体现了藓种的生态适应性差异，可为藓结皮耐旱藓种和人工培养藓种选择提供参考。

关键词: 农业生态系统健康, 因子诊断, 时空格局

Abstract: Moss-dominated crusts play important roles in ecological restoration in hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Four dominant moss species Didymodon vinealis (Brid.) Zand., Didymodon tectorum (C. Mull.) Saito, Barbula unguiculata Hedw. and Bryum argenteum Hedw. in the community of biological soil crusts in the hilly Loess Plateau region were chosen as objects. The morphological and anatomical structure of the four moss species were observed and measured in this study. The results showed that D. vinealis had greater shoot height (6.1 mm), stem diameter (298.6 μm), midribs width (65.5 μm), leaf width (590.9 μm) and blade thickness (14.8 μm) than the other three species; the stem epidermis cell wall of D. vinealis was obviously incrassate and the cortex cells were distributed in a mosaic pattern. D. tectorum did not show significant advantages in its stem and leaf structure. With coarse stems and leaves, D. vinealis had stronger desiccation tolerance than the other three species, and thus it was easy to adapt to the variability of environmental moisture. The leaf length (3.2 mm) and basal leaf cell size (191.2 μm²) of B. unguiculata were significantly higher than that of the other three species and contained much more chloroplasts. Their midribs were in sharp “v” form, and this morphological structure was closely related to their water harvesting. In B. argenteum, the cortex cell area was 987.8 μm², and single cortex cell accounted for approximately 3.1% of stem transversesectional area. The leaf hair (274 μm) was significantly longer than that of the other three species and the upper leaf cells and leaf hair of this species were transparent, which endows it to grow in the conditions with periodical drought stress and to resist light radiation. Our study suggested that the differences in stem and leaf morphological structure existed among the four moss species, with different adaptation to various water and light conditions, which may reflect their ecological adaptability. Also, this study may provide reference for species selection in restoration of moss crusts.

Key words: agroecosystem health, spatial-temporal pattern, factor diagnose

杨雪伟1,2,赵允格2,许明祥2*. 黄土丘陵区藓结皮优势种形态结构差异[J]. 生态学杂志.

YANG Xue-wei1,2, ZHAO Yun-ge2, XU Ming-xiang2*. Variation of morphological structure of dominant species in moss crusts in hilly Loess Plateau region. [J]. cje.

[1]	田北辰, 农昀, 黄啸, 谢燕华. 新冠疫情下的鸟类时空格局变化特征及其对城市生态规划的启示——以香港为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1155-1166.
[2]	张惠婷, 孟凡浩, 萨楚拉, 罗敏, 王牧兰, 李晨昊. 2001—2019年蒙古高原生态系统质量时空格局变化及归因分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 425-435.
[3]	石丹, 关婧文. 基于DPSIR物元的吉林省旅游生态安全时空格局测度及障碍诊断 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1653-1664.
[4]	逯承鹏, 刘志良, 刘祎平, 毛锦凰. 黄河流域产业生态化时空格局及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1342-1350.
[5]	徐彩仙, 巩杰, 燕玲玲, 高秉丽, 李焱. 甘肃白龙江流域土壤保持服务供需风险时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(5): 1397-1408.
[6]	张月, 袁泉, 房磊, 韩艳刚, 朱琪, 齐麟, 周旺明, 周莉, 于大炮. 长白山自然保护区高海拔云冷杉林净初级生产力时空格局及其驱动因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(11): 3483-3492.
[7]	张韦萍,石培基,赵武生,冯涛,付春雨. 西北区域城镇化与资源环境承载力协调发展的时空特征——以兰西城市群为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2337-2347.
[8]	刘洋洋,章钊颖,同琳静,王倩,周伟,王振乾,李建龙. 中国草地净初级生产力时空格局及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(2): 349-363.
[9]	贾风勤,任娟娟,张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠沙丘微地形变化对草本植物多样性影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(1): 26-34.
[10]	潘高1,2,张合平1*,潘登1,2. 湖南省2000—2014年碳排放效应及时空格局 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5): 1382-1389.
[11]	项贤领**,陶媛媛,席贻龙. 轮虫种群遗传结构及系统地理格局研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(7): 2048-2057.
[12]	蔡永久1,2,刘劲松3,戴小琳3,许浩1,薛庆举1,龚志军1**. 长荡湖大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1224-1232.
[13]	张调风1,张勃1**,张苗2,刘秀丽1,3,孙力炜1,安美玲1. 1962—2010年甘肃省黄土高原区干旱时空动态格局 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(08): 2066-2074.
[14]	任修涛, 沈果,王振龙,路纪琪. 道路和放牧对锡林郭勒草原布氏田鼠种群时空分布的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(10): 2245-2249.
[15]	宋富强;康慕谊;陈雅如;杨朋;刘阳;王强. 陕北黄土高原植被净初级生产力的估算 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(11): 2311-2318.