欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土丘陵区生态系统服务空间格局及权衡与协同关系——以榆中县为例

王川1,2,刘春芳1,2*,乌亚汗1,2,刘宥延1,2   

  1. 1西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070;2甘肃省土地利用与综合整治工程研究中心, 兰州 730070)
  • 出版日期:2019-02-10 发布日期:2019-02-10

Spatial pattern, tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study in Yuzhong County.

WANG Chuan1,2, LIU Chun-fang1,2*, WU Ya-han1,2, LIU You-yan1,2   

  1. (1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China).
  • Online:2019-02-10 Published:2019-02-10

摘要: 以甘肃榆中县为例,综合InVEST模型、ArcGIS、R和GeoDa软件,基于村级尺度,利用空间热点分析、相关分析和空间自相关分析,研究了该县2015年生物多样性维持、土壤保持、产水量、碳储量和食物供给5种典型生态系统服务的空间分异特征及权衡与协同关系。结果表明:5种生态系统服务具有明显的空间异质性,生物多样性维持、产水量和碳储量呈现出“南-中-北”逐渐递减的三级梯度特征,土壤保持表现为南部高、北部居中、中部低的态势,食物供给则表现为中部高、南部和北部低的空间格局;热点分析表明,生态系统服务空间一致性较高,高值集聚区(热点)主要位于南部山区,低值集聚区(冷点)多分布于北部黄土丘陵区,而食物供给服务的高值集聚区主要位于中部川区,低值集聚区集中在北部黄土丘陵区;基于相关性分析和双变量Moran I分析结果表明:食物供给与其他4种服务之间是权衡关系,其中与土壤保持和生物多样性维持的权衡关系较强,与碳储量和产水量的权衡关系较弱,而其他4种服务之间主要是强弱不等的协同关系;空间格局上,生态系统服务间的权衡与协同关系异质性较强。

关键词: 苏南地区, 稻田, 肥力演变, 养分平衡, 合理施肥量

Abstract: Taking Yuzhong County from Gansu Province as an example, using the InVEST model, ArcGIS, R and GeoDa software, and based on spatial hotspot analysis, correlation analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis, we examined the spatial heterogeneity and potential tradeoffs and synergies of five typical ecosystem services in 2015 at the village scale, including biodiversity maintenance, soil retention, water yield, carbon storage and food supply. The five ecosystem services showed obvious spatial heterogeneity. The biodiversity maintenance, water yield and carbon storage showed a threeorder gradient decrease from south to central to north. The capacity of soil retention was high in the south, moderate in the north, and low in the middle area. The food supply was high in the middle area and low in the south and north. The hotspot analysis showed that the spatial concordance among multiple ecosystem services was relatively high. The high-value clusters (hot spots) of ecosystem services were mainly located in the southern mountainous regions, the lowvalue clusters (clod spots) were mostly distributed in the northern loess hilly regions, while the highvalue clusters of food supply services were mainly located in the central areas, and the lowvalue clusters were concentrated in the northern loess hilly regions. The results of correlation analysis and bivariate Moran’s I analysis showed that there were tradeoffs between food supply and the other four types of ecosystem services. Specifically, the food supply had strong tradeoffs with soil retention and biodiversity maintenance, and weak tradeoffs with carbon storage and water yield. Relationships among the biodiversity maintenance, soil retention, water yield, and carbon storage were mainly characterized by synergies with different degrees. Spatially,there was strong heterogeneity of tradeoffs and synergies among different ecosystem services.

Key words: Southern area of Jiangsu Province, Paddy field, Fertility evolution, Nutrient balance, Reasonable fertilizer application amount