大兴安岭北坡落叶松林火后植被演替过程研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用由植被空间序列推断时间系列的方法,分析大兴安岭呼中林区近20年来不同火烧迹地植被变化情况。结果表明,森林火后初始,植物尤其是草本物种迅速增多,火烧迹地的植被主要由草本所占据,但随着时间的推移,草本物种不仅在数量上有明显减少,在物种组成上有很大的变化,而且盖度也逐渐减少。灌木及乔木物种由于种类较少,在种类及组成上演替初期变化不如草本明显,但是盖度却逐渐增多。在本地区火后植被次生演替过程中,高频物种所占的比例较高且呈上升趋势,这明显有悖于Raunkiaer频度定律关于在相对稳定的群落中高频物种所占的比例应相对较低的规律。另外,不同火烧迹地间灌木的物种相似度明显高于草本的物种相似度,火烧年份相近的火烧迹地上的草本物种相似度要明显高于火烧年份远的草本物种相似度,但灌木间的物种相似度却没有出现这种现象,没有明显的规律。

关键词: 缺苞箭竹, 密度, 生物量分配格局

Abstract: With method of deducing time series from spatial series for vegetation succession,we analyzed the vegetational dynamics in Huzhong burned area of Daxinganling in recent 20 years.The results showed that the number of species,especially herbs,increased rapidly in the burned area soon after fire.But as time went on,the number of herbs decreased obviously,with great composition change,and coverage declination.Conversely,the coverage of shrubs and trees increased gradually,but the number of species and composition did not vary significantly.Throughout succession,the ratio of high frequency species was high and increasing,which did not obviously conform to Raunkiaer's law of frequency that the ratio of high frequency species was low in relatively steady communities.In addition,the similarities of shrubs in different burned areas were higher than those of herbs.The similarities of herbs in the burned area of close years were higher than those in the burned area of distant years.There was no obvious rule among the similarities of shrub species in the burned area of various years.

Key words: Fargesia denudata, Density, Biomass distribution pattern

中图分类号:

S718

王绪高, 李秀珍, 贺红士, 冷文芳, 问青春. 大兴安岭北坡落叶松林火后植被演替过程研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, (5): 35-41.

WANG Xugao, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, LENG Wenfang, WEN Qingchun. Postfire succession of larch forest in the northern slope of Daxinganling[J]. cje, 2004, (5): 35-41.

参考文献

[1] 杜晓明,周志强,张悦,等.2002.大兴安岭北坡植被演替规律探讨[J].国土与自然资源研究,2:67～68.
[2] 李博.2000.生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,112～158.
[3] 李雪风.1987.大兴安岭盘中林场火烧迹地森林恢复的对策[J].林业科技,67:22～23.
[4] 罗德昆.1987.大兴安岭过火迹地更新方式的研讨[J].林业科技,53:10～12.
[5] 舒立福,田晓瑞,马林涛.1999.林火生态的研究与应用[J].林业科学研究,12(4):422～427.
[6] 舒立辅,左继春,田文涛.1996.大兴安岭"五、六"大火火烧迹地的天然更新探讨[J].林业资源管理,6:43～45.
[7] 王绪高,李秀珍,孔繁花,等.2003.大兴安岭北坡火烧迹地自然与人工干预下的植被恢复模式初探[J].生态学杂志,22(5):30～34.
[8] 肖笃宁,陶大立,徐振邦,等.1988.大兴安岭北部特大火灾对森林资源及环境的影响[J].生态学杂志,7(增):5～9.
[9] 徐化成.1998.中国大兴安岭森林[M].北京:科学出版社,41～43.
[10] 杨树春,刘新田,曹海波,等.1998.大兴安岭林区火烧迹地植被变化研究[J].东北林业大学学报,26(1):19～23.
[11] 郑焕能,贾松清,胡海清.1986.大兴安岭的林火与森林恢复[J].东北林业大学学报,14:1～7.
[12] 郑焕能,温广玉,柴一新.1999.林火灾变阈值[J].火灾科学,8(3):1～5.
[13] 周以良.1991.中国大兴安岭植被[M].北京:科学出版社,205～216.
[14] Borchert M, Johnson M, Schreiner D, et al. 2003. Early postfire seed dispersal, seed establishment and seed mortality of Pinus coulteri (D. Don) in central coastal California, USA[J]. Plant Ecol., 168: 207～220.
[15] Cwynar LC. 1987. Fire and forest history of the north Cascade Range[J]. Ecology, 68(4) :791 ～802.
[16] Fastie CL. 1995. Causes and ecosystem consequences of multiple pathways of primary succession at Glacier Bay, Alaska[ J ]. Ecology, 76:1899～1916.
[17] Gill AM. 1975. Fire and the Australian flora: a review[J]. Aust.For., 38:1～25.
[18] Grant CD, Loneragan WA. 1999. The effects of burning on the understorey composition of 11-13 year-old rehabilitated bauxite mines in Western Australia[J]. Plant Ecol., 145: 291～305.
[19] Grogan P, Bruns TD, Chapin FS. 2000. Fire effects on ecosystem nitrogen cycling in a Californian bishop pine forest [ J ]. Oecologia, 122(4) :537～544.
[20] Hanes TL, Jones H. 1967. Post-fire chaparral succession in southern California[ J ]. Ecology, 48: 257～264.
[21] He HS, Mladenoff DJ. 1999. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession [ J ].Ecology, 80 (1): 81～99.
[22] Keeley SC, Keeley JE, Hutchinson SM, et al. 1981. Postfire succession of the herbaceous flora in Southern California chaparral [J]. Ecology, 62(6): 1608～1621.
[23] Kercher JR, Axelrod MC. 1984. A process model of fire ecology and succession in a mixed-conifer forest [ J ]. Ecology, 65 (6):1725～1742.
[24] Lloret F, Calvo E, Pons X, et al. 2002. Wildfire and landscape dynamics in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula[J ]. Landscape Ecol.,17: 745～759.
[25] Perston CA, Baldwin IT. 1999. Positive and negative signals regulate germination in the post-fire annual Nicotiana attenuata [J]. Ecology, 80(2) :481 ～494.
[26] Phillips DL, Shure DJ. 1990. Patch-size effects on early succession in Southern Appalachian forests[J]. Ecology, 71 (1): 204 ～212.
[27] Rieske LK. 2002. Wildfire alters oak growth, foliar chemistry,and herbivory[J]. For. Ecol. Man., 168: 91～99.
[28] Romme WH. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone national park[J]. Ecol. Monogr., 52(2): 199～221.
[29] Romme WH, Knight DH. 1981. Fire frequency and subalpine forest succession along a topographic gradient in Wyoming [ J ].Ecology, 62(2): 319～326.
[30] Shafi MI, Yarranton GA. 1973. Diversity, fioristic richness, and species evenness during a secondary(post-fire) succession[J]. Ecology, 54(4) :897～902.
[31] Turner MG, Romme WH, Reed RA, et al. 2003. Post-fire aspen seedling recruitment across Yellowstone (USA) Landscape [ J ].Landscape Ecol., 18:127～140.
[32] Turner MG, Romme WH. 1994. Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems[ J ]. Landscape Ecol., 9(1): 59～77.
[33] Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, et al. 1997. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park[J]. Ecol. Monogr., 4(67) :411 ～433.
[34] Ward SC, Koch JM, Nichols OG, 1990. Bauxite mine rehabilitation in the Darling Range, Western Australia [J]. Proc. Ecol.Soc. Aust., 16:557～565.