欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2777-2786.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.034

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤和有机物料中可溶性有机碳氮差异:基于强弱两种浸提剂的对比

朱屹1,全智1,2,3,4*,魏福龙1,刘畅2,马建2,4,鲁彩艳2,4,陈欣2,4,史奕2,4,方运霆2,3   

  1. 1潍坊现代农业与生态环境研究院, 山东潍坊 261041; 2中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016; 3辽宁省稳定同位素技术重点实验室, 沈阳 110016; 4辽宁沈阳农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 沈阳 110016)
  • 出版日期:2026-08-10 发布日期:2026-08-20

Differences in soluble organic carbon and nitrogen in soil and organic materials: A comparative study based on weak and strong extractants.

ZHU Yi1, QUAN Zhi1,2,3,4*, WEI Fulong1, LIU Chang2, MA Jian2,4, LU Caiyan2,4, CHEN Xin2,4, SHI Yi2,4, FANG Yunting2,3   

  1. (1Weifang Institute of Modern Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Weifang 261041, Shandong, China; 2Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; 3Key Laboratory of Stable Isotope Techniques and Applications, Shenyang 110016, China; 4National Field Research Station of Shenyang Agroecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-20

摘要: 可溶性碳氮组分作为土壤与有机物料中的活性组分,其含量和变化直接影响土壤质量演变与生物地球化学循环过程。本研究选取9种土壤和6种有机物料,采用0.01 M CaCl2(弱提取)和0.5 M K2SO4(强提取)浸提,对比了浸提态有机碳(EOC)和有机氮(EON)的变异特征。结果表明:1)土壤EOC、EON含量分别在13.1~390.8和3.3~30.3 mg·kg-1,其中CaCl2与K2SO4提取EOC占总浸提态碳(TEC)的平均比例分别为79%±22%和88%±16%,而EON占总浸提态氮(TEN)的平均比例分别为10%±10%和20%±14%;2)有机物料EOC和EON含量远高于土壤,分别为1.2~77.1和0.4~8.5 g·kg-1,其EOC/TEC(96%~97%)和EON/TEN(71%~85%)也显著高于土壤;3)紫外光谱的结果显示,浸提液在254 nm的吸光值(SUVA254)与EOC/EON呈显著负相关,说明浸提有机物中低C/N组分具有更高的芳香基团占比;4)土壤中CaCl2提取的EOC和EON占K2SO4提取的平均比例分别为19%±8%和44%±20%,说明弱提取更易获取低C/N组分,而强提取可释放更多高C/N组分;有机物料因缺乏土壤固持机制,不同强度浸提剂提取效率差异不显著。本研究从浸提剂强度选择视角揭示土壤和有机物料中浸提态碳氮组分的含量差异,为精准评估土壤碳氮周转及其生态环境效应提供了方法学依据。


关键词: 土壤, 有机物料, 浸提态有机碳, 浸提态有机氮, 浸提剂种类

Abstract: Extractable carbon and nitrogen fractions are key components in soils and organic materials, directly influencing soil quality and biogeochemical cycling through their contents and variability. We investigated nine soils and six organic materials that were extracted using two extractants, 0.01 M CaCl2 (weak extraction) and 0.5 M K2SO4 (strong extraction), to compare the variations in extractable organic carbon (EOC) and organic nitrogen (EON). The results showed that: (1) EOC and EON concentrations in soils ranged from 13.1 to 390.8 mg·kg-1 and 3.3 to 30.3 mg·kg-1, respectively. On average, CaCl2 and K2SOextracted EOC accounted for 79%±22% and 88%±16% of total extractable carbon (TEC), while EON represented 10%±10% and 20%±14% of total extractable nitrogen (TEN), respectively. (2) Organic materials exhibited significantly higher EOC (1.2-77.1 g·kg-1) and EON (0.4-8.5 g·kg-1) levels, with EOC/TEC (96%-97%) and EON/TEN (71%-85%) markedly exceeding those in soils. (3) There was a significant negative correlation between SUVA254 (specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm) and EOC/EON ratios, indicating that low C/N extractable organic components were enriched in aromatic structures. (4) In soils, CaClextracted EOC and EON accounted for 19%±8% and 44%±20% of K2SOextracted amounts, respectively, suggesting that weak extraction preferentially mobilized low C/N fractions and that strong extraction released more high C/N fractions. For organic materials, the absence of stabilization mechanisms resulted in negligible differences in extraction efficiency between the two extractants. This study elucidates variations in extractable C/N fractions based on extractant strength, providing methodological insights for the precise assessment of soil C and N turnover and its associated eco-environmental effects.


Key words: soil, organic material, extractable organic carbon, extractable organic nitrogen, extractant type