欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 2085-2095.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202606.039

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

科尔沁沙地生态系统服务权衡协同及驱动因子

慕全飞1,王永芳1,2*,郭恩亮1,红英1,马浩文1,周得龙1,王妍力1   

  1. 1内蒙古师范大学地理科学学院, 呼和浩特 010022; 2蒙古高原气候变化与区域响应高校重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010022)

  • 出版日期:2026-06-10 发布日期:2026-12-01

Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services and the driving factors in Horqin Sandy Land.

MU Quanfei1, WANG Yongfang1,2*, GUO Enliang1, HONG Ying1, MA Haowen1, ZHOU Delong1, WANG Yanli1   

  1. (1College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China; 2Key Laboratory of Mongolian Plateau’s Climate System, Hohhot 010022, China).

  • Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-12-01

摘要: 依托于“三北”防护林和退耕还林还草等生态工程的实施,科尔沁沙地生态环境逐步好转。探讨科尔沁沙地生态系统服务的权衡协同关系及驱动因子对后续生态环境保护及治理具有重要意义。本文利用InVEST模型定量评估科尔沁沙地2022年的水源涵养、土壤保持、碳储存和生境质量4种服务,并基于贝叶斯网络和双变量空间自相关等研究方法分析4种服务之间权衡协同关系的空间分布及驱动因子。结果表明:(1)土壤保持、碳储存和生境质量的空间分布较为相近,呈现西高东低的分布特征,水源涵养则是呈现东高西低的分布特征;(2)降水、降雨侵蚀、土地利用、蒸散发、坡度、NDVI、NPP和夜间灯光是影响4种生态系统服务的重要因子;(3)在全域尺度上,水源涵养分别与土壤保持、碳储存、生境质量呈权衡关系,土壤保持、碳储存、生境质量则两两呈协同关系。在县域尺度上,土壤保持-碳储存、土壤保持-生境质量的协同关系表现出空间异质性和尺度效应;(4)贝叶斯网络情景模拟表明,土地利用和坡度是影响4种生态系统服务权衡协同关系的驱动因子。本研究可为科尔沁沙地生态系统服务高效利用提供参考。


关键词: 科尔沁沙地, 生态系统服务, 权衡协同, 贝叶斯网络, 驱动因子

Abstract: The environment of Horqin Sandy Land has gradually improved with the implementation of ecological engineering such as the ThreeNorth Shelter Forest Program and the Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program. Exploring the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services and their driving factors in Horqin Sandy Land is of great significance for ecological environment protection and governance. We quantitatively assessed four ecosystem services in Horqin Sandy Land in 2022 using the InVEST model, including water yield, soil retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality. We analyzed the spatial distribution and driving factors of the trade-offs and synergies among the four services based on Bayesian network and bivariate spatial autocorrelation methods. The results showed that (1) The spatial distribution of soil retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality was relatively similar, showing a distribution pattern of high in west and low in east, while water yield showed a pattern of high in east and low in west; (2) Rainfall, rainfall erosion, land use, evapotranspiration, slope, NDVI, NPP, and nighttime light were important influencing factors for the four ecosystem services; (3) At the regional scale, water conservation showed a tradeoff relationship with soil conservation, carbon sequestration services, and habitat quality. There were synergistic relationships among soil conservation, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality. At the county scale, the synergistic relationships between soil conservation and carbon sequestration, as well as between soil conservation and habitat quality, showed spatial heterogeneity and scale effects; (4) The Bayesian network scenario simulation indicated that land use and slope were the driving factors of the trade-off and synergy relationships among the four ecosystem services. Our results can provide a reference for the efficient utilization of ecosystem services in Horqin Sandy Land.


Key words: Horqin Sandy Land, ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergies, Bayesian network, driving factor