欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1678-1687.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202505.044

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国草地植被碳储量估算研究进展

赵佳俊1,2,侯鹏2,陈妍2*   

  1. 1中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012; 2生态环境部卫星环境应用中心, 北京 100094)
  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-05-14

Research progress on the estimation of vegetation carbon storage of grasslands in China.

ZHAO Jiajun1,2, HOU Peng2, CHEN Yan2*   

  1. (1Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; 2Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-05-14

摘要: 草地作为我国陆地生态系统重要的碳库,对我国气候调节和实现碳达峰碳中和具有重要意义。综合以往草地植被碳储量估算的相关文献,本文综述了草地植被碳储量代表性估算方法,并分析了不同估算结果的差异性来源。结果表明:自21世纪以来我国草地植被碳储量的估算值之间差异较大,碳储量的估算结果介于0.56~4.66 Pg,均值为2.22 Pg,碳密度估算结果介于216~1148 g C·m-2,均值为654.23 g C·m-2;草地植被枯落物碳储量占比介于0.1%~8.6%,均值为5.6%,枯落物的忽略会导致碳储量估算总量偏低;采用全球单位碳密度估算方法同其他估算方法之间存在显著性差异(P<0.05);草地植被地上部、地下部和枯落物的含碳率分别为39.3%、36.6%和30.7%,植被地上部含碳率与枯落物含碳率之间呈显著性差异(P<0.05),采用较为普遍的碳转换系数45%会导致草地植被碳储量估算总量偏大;不同草地类型根茎比差异较大,介于0.76~41.80,均值为9.16。综上,草地植被碳储量的估算方法、数据源、重要参数的不同,导致了草地植被碳储量估算总量之间的差异。


关键词: 草地, 根茎比, 含碳率, 枯落物, 差异性

Abstract: Grassland, as a critical terrestrial carbon reservoir in China, plays a crucial role in climate regulation and achieving the goals of carbon peak and neutrality. Based on relevant literature, we provided a comprehensive overview of representative estimation methods of grassland vegetation carbon storage and analyzed the sources of disparities in different estimation results. The results showed that since the beginning of the 21st century, there has been a significant variation in the estimated carbon storage values of grassland vegetation in China. The estimated carbon storage ranges from 0.56 to 4.66 Pg, with an average of 2.22 Pg. The estimated carbon density ranges from 216 to 1148 g C·m-2, with an average of 654.23 g C·m-2. The contribution of litter carbon storage fluctuates between 0.1% and 8.6%, with an average of 5.6%. Neglecting litter would underestimate total carbon storage. The global unit carbon density estimation method showed significant differences with other estimation methods (P<0.05). Carbon concentration in the aboveground, belowground and litter components is approximately 39.3%, 36.6%, and 30.7%, respectively. There were significant differences between the carbon concentration of aboveground vegetation and litter (P<0.05). Using the common carbon conversion factor of 45% could overestimate grassland vegetation carbon storage. Root/shoot ratios varied across different grassland types, ranging from 0.76 to 41.80, with a mean of 9.16. In summary, differences in estimation methods, data sources, and key parameters resulted in variations in the estimates of grassland vegetation carbon storage in China.


Key words: grassland, root/shoot ratio, carbon content, litter, discrepancy