欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1688-1698.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202505.012

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国生态空间识别技术的研究进展与展望

顾鹏程1,徐畅2,田志强1,彭文龙2,吕晓2,3,4*
  

  1. 1中国国土勘测规划院, 北京 100035; 2东北大学文法学院, 沈阳 110169; 3辽宁省自然资源厅土地保护与利用重点实验室, 沈阳 110169; 4辽宁土地利用与保护研究基地, 沈阳 110169)

  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-05-15

Research progress and prospects of ecological space identification technology in China.

GU Pengcheng1, XU Chang2, TIAN Zhiqiang1, PENG Wenlong2, LYU Xiao2,3,4*   

  1. (1China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China; 2School of Humanities and Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China; 3Key Laboratory of Land Protection and Use, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110169, China; 4Research Base of Land Use and Protection of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110169, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-05-15

摘要: 科学识别生态空间是推进国土空间治理体系和治理能力现代化的基础。本文运用文献分析法、归纳总结法和比较分析法,厘清生态空间识别的概念,梳理生态空间识别技术进展,进一步明确未来相关研究的创新路径与方向。中国生态空间识别技术主要包括多源数据叠置分析、生态空间评价、InVEST模型与相关空间分析方法集成、濒危物种栖息地或自然保护地识别以及生态空间动态识别,并且其发展和完善程度依次递进;不同的生态空间识别技术适宜尺度、数据需求、研究范式和研究目的皆有异同,并分别存在优缺点。基于此,梳理出不同尺度上多种生态空间技术体系综合运用、取长补短的全流程生态保护空缺空间识别技术路径。未来研究将聚焦于构建因地制宜且全面多维的生态空间识别技术体系、促进技术融合与跨学科合作、加强国际合作与技术本土化创新建设三方面。


关键词: 生态空间, 空间识别, 技术体系

Abstract: Scientific identification of ecological space is the basis for promoting the modernization of land space governance system and governance capacity. We used literature review, inductive summarization and comparative analysis to clarify the concept of ecological space identification. We reviewed recent technological advancements and further defined the innovative pathways and directions for future research. China’s ecological space identification techniques primarily consisted of multisource data overlay analysis, ecological space evaluation, integration of the InVEST model with related spatial analysis methods, habitat identification for endangered species or nature reserves, and dynamic ecological space identification, with steady progress in their development and refinement. These techniques varied in scale, data requirements, research paradigms, and objectives, each possessing distinct advantages and limitations. Accordingly, we delineated the technical approaches with complete flow scheme for identifying ecological protection gaps by comprehensively applying various ecological space identification systems at multiple scales, complementing each other. Future research should focus on three key aspects: developing a comprehensive and multidimensional ecological space identification technology tailored to local conditions, fostering technological integration and interdisciplinary collaboration, and enhancing international cooperation and localized innovation.


Key words: ecological space, spatial identification, technical system