欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1363-1371.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202504.006

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态完整性与生态系统健康的区别及适用范围

龙心远1,2,3,4,何萍1,3,4*   

  1. 1中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012; 2兰州大学生态学院, 兰州 730000; 3国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 北京 100012; 4环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室, 北京 100012)

  • 出版日期:2025-04-10 发布日期:2025-04-15

The difference between ecological integrity and ecosystem health and their application scopes.

LONG Xinyuan1,2,3,4, HE Ping1,3,4*   

  1. (1Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; 2College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Beijing 100012, China; 4State Key Laboratory of Environment Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China).

  • Online:2025-04-10 Published:2025-04-15

摘要: 生态完整性和生态系统健康是生态系统管理的重要目标,在具体评价工作中经常出现两个概念混淆或误用的情况。对比分析结果,二者在概念内涵、管理目标、价值观念、参比基准和评价方法五个方面存在差异:(1)生态完整性强调自然性,而生态系统健康强调可持续性和社会价值;(2)生态完整性的目标方向为无人类干扰的自然状态,而生态系统健康则是基于社会需求构建理想状态;(3)生态完整性基于自然保护价值观,而生态系统健康则基于功利保护价值观;(4)生态完整性评价的参比基准为自然或历史状态,而生态系统健康基准则为可达到的最优值或公认的标准值;(5)生态完整性评价指标主要包含物理、化学指标和生物指标,而生态系统健康在此基础上还增加了管理指标和经济指标。生态完整性和生态系统健康概念提出的背景和评价逻辑具有一定的相似性,因此存在一定交集,但是前者的适用对象是自然生态系统,后者的适用对象是受人为活动强烈扰动和人工修复后的生态系统。建议在厘清概念内涵差异的基础上,根据评价对象的生态地理区背景、人类干扰强度以及管理目标,选择适用的评价方法。


关键词: 生态完整性, 生态系统健康, 评价方法

Abstract: Ecological integrity and ecosystem health are important goals of ecosystem management. The two concepts are frequently confused and misapplied in assessment work. As a result of the comparative analysis, both concepts differ in five aspects: concept connotation, management objectives, value orientation, reference benchmarks, and assessment methods. (1) Ecological integrity emphasizes naturalness, while ecosystem health emphasizes sustainability and social values. (2) The goal of ecological integrity is to maintain a natural state without human disturbance, while ecosystem health aims for an ideal state based on social needs. (3) Ecological integrity is based on nature conservation values, while ecosystem health is based on utilitarian conservation values. (4) The reference benchmark for assessing ecological integrity is the natural or historical state undisturbed by human beings, while for ecosystem health, it is the optimal attainable state or the recognized state. (5) The assessment indices for ecological integrity include physical, chemical, and biological indicators, while the assessment of ecosystem health incorporates additional indicators, such as management and economic factors. Ecological integrity and ecosystem health share similar conceptual contexts and assessment logic, with overlaps between them. The former is applicable to natural ecosystems, while the latter is applicable to disturbed or restored ecosystems. The choice between them should be based on the differences in concept connotation, the ecoregions, the intensity of human interference, and the management objectives.


Key words: ecological integrity, ecosystem health, assessment method