欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3606-3612.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202511.010

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

养鸭密度对稻鸭共作水稻产量及氮磷养分吸收利用的影响

刘红江,郭智,张岳芳,孙国峰,张丽萍,周炜,盛婧*   

  1. (江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/江苏省农业生物多样性培育与利用研究中心, 南京 210014)

  • 出版日期:2025-11-10 发布日期:2025-11-07

The effect of duck farming density on rice yield and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and utilization in rice-duck co-culture system.

LIU Hongjiang, GUO Zhi, ZHANG Yuefang, SUN Guofeng, ZHANG Liping, ZHOU Wei, SHENG Jing*   

  1. (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environments, Jiangsu Academy of Agriculture Sciences/Jiangsu Agricultural Biodiversity Cultivation and Utilization Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China).

  • Online:2025-11-10 Published:2025-11-07

摘要: 通过不同鸭子放养密度对比试验,研究稻鸭共作对水稻产量及氮磷吸收利用的影响,为稻鸭共作生产实践提供理论参考。大田试验以水稻品种南粳46为供试材料,设置常规对照(CK),以及每1 hm2放养0(D0)、75(D1)、150(D2)、225(D3)和300(D4)只鸭子等6个处理,分析了水稻产量、生物产量、氮素和磷素吸收利用等变化特征。结果表明:(1)与常规对照相比较,稻鸭共作处理水稻产量降低显著,主要原因是其有效穗数显著减少;适当增加鸭子的放养密度使水稻产量呈增加的趋势,D3处理水稻产量最高。(2)稻鸭共作使水稻生物产量降低显著,适当增加鸭子放养密度能提高水稻生物产量和收获指数,D3处理水稻产量较高是其生物产量和收获指数提高共同作用的结果。(3)稻鸭共作显著降低水稻植株含氮率和吸氮量,随着鸭子放养密度的增加,水稻植株含氮率和吸氮量有逐渐增加的趋势;稻鸭共作能够显著提高水稻氮素干物质生产效率和籽粒生产效率。(4)稻鸭共作显著提高水稻植株含磷率,较高的鸭子放养密度能够显著提高水稻植株吸磷量;稻鸭共作显著降低水稻磷素干物质和籽粒生产效率。(5)稻鸭共作虽然会增加生产成本,但其通过增加产值,提高了经济效益,较高的养鸭密度能够进一步提高经济效益。综上,稻鸭共作,每1 hm2放养225只鸭子的处理(D3)水稻产量、生物产量以及氮磷吸收量相对较高,且能够取得较高的经济效益。


关键词: 稻鸭共作, 水稻, 产量, 氮素吸收利用, 磷素吸收利用

Abstract: Based on an experiment with different duck farming densities, we examined the effects of rice-duck co-culture on rice yield of cultivar Nanjing 46 and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and utilization, providing theoretical reference for the production practice of rice-duck co-culture. Six treatments including conventional control (CK), releasing of 0 (D0), 75 (D1), 150 (D2), 225 (D3), and 300 (D4) ducks per 1 hm2 were set up. The rice yield, biomass, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and utilization were analyzed. Results showed that: (1) rice-duck co-culture significantly reduced rice yield, mainly due to the decrease in the number of effective panicles in rice. Appropriately increasing the farming density of ducks led to an increasing trend in rice yield, with D3 treatment having the highest rice yield. (2) The co-culture of rice and duck significantly reduced the biological yield of rice, whereas both the biological yield and harvest index of rice increased with appropriately increasing the farming density of ducks. The higher rice yield under D3 treatment was the result of the combined effect of the increase in biological yield and harvest index. (3) Rice-duck co-culture significantly reduced nitrogen content and nitrogen uptake of rice plants. With the increases of duck farming density, nitrogen content and nitrogen uptake of rice plants gradually increased. Rice-duck co-culture could significantly improve the efficiency of nitrogen-based dry matter production and grain production of rice. (4) Rice-duck co-culture significantly improved plant phosphorus concentration. Higher duck farming density could significantly increase the phosphorus uptake of rice plants. Rice-duck co-culture significantly reduced the efficiency of phosphorus-based dry matter production and grain production in rice. (5) Although rice-duck co-culture increased production costs, it ultimately improved economic benefits by increasing output value, and increasing duck farming density can further enhance economic benefits. In summary, rice-duck co-culture with the D3 treatment of 225 ducks per 1 hm2 resulted in relatively high rice yield, biological yield, and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, and thus achieved higher economic benefits.


Key words: rice-duck co-culture, rice, yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization, phosphorus uptake and utilization