欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3598-3605.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202511.018

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同硝铵态氮配比下间作驱动作物竞争稳定性的效应分析

严跃党,谢秀婷,戴利利,程霞,刘英超*   

  1. (昆明学院农学与生命科学学院, 昆明 650214)

  • 出版日期:2025-11-10 发布日期:2025-11-07

Analysis of effects of intercropping driving crop competitive stability under different ratios of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen.

YAN Yuedang, XIE Xiuting, DAI Lili, CHENG Xia, LIU Yingchao*#br#

#br#
  

  1. (College of Agronomy and Biological Science, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China).

  • Online:2025-11-10 Published:2025-11-07

摘要: 为明确不同硝铵态氮配比条件下间作对作物稳定性的影响,本研究以小麦(Tricum aestivum)和蚕豆(Vicia faba)间作为对象,通过盆栽试验,采用硝铵态氮不同配比即单施硝态氮(N1)、硝态氮∶铵态氮=1∶3(N2)、硝态氮∶铵态氮=2∶2(N3)、硝态氮∶铵态氮=3∶1(N4)、单施铵态氮(N5)处理,测定单、间作条件下作物生物量,分析间作作物增产率(OY)、小麦对蚕豆种间竞争力(AWF)、相对作用强度(RII)、种间相容性(RYT)、生产力稳定性。结果表明:与单作相比,间作增加了小麦生物量,N2条件下,间作小麦生物量提高86.0%(P<0.05);不同硝铵态氮配比条件下,AWF均大于0,RYT大于1,N2处理时,AWF与RYT达到最大值;与单作相比,N1、N2和N3处理条件下,间作小麦和蚕豆的时间稳定性差异显著;而N1、N2处理下,间作小麦和蚕豆结构稳定性差异显著;小麦RII和AWF与间作体系地上部生物量时间稳定性呈正相关,而蚕豆RII与间作体系时间稳定性呈负相关。综上,间作作物既有竞争关系又促进生产力稳定性,N2处理下效果最明显。


关键词: 硝态氮, 铵态氮, 间作, 竞争, 稳定性

Abstract: We examined the effects of intercropping on crop stability under different ratios of nitrogen forms with a wheat (Tricum aestivum) and faba bean (Vicia faba) intercropping system. A pot experiment was designed under treatments with different ratios of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen including nitrate nitrogen alone (N1), nitrate∶ammonium=1∶3 (N2), nitrate:ammonium=2∶2 (N3), nitrate∶ammonium=3∶1 (N4), and ammonium nitrogen alone (N5). We analyzed crop yield increase (OY), aggressivity (AWF), relative interaction intensity (RII), interspecific compatibility (RYT) and productivity stability of intercropping system by measuring crop biomass under different cropping conditions. The results showed that wheat biomass was increased under intercropping compared with monocropping. Intercropping wheat biomass was increased by 86.0% than monocropping under N2 treatment (P<0.05). AWF of wheat was greater than 0 and RYT was greater than 1 under different nitrate and ammonium nitrogen ratios. The maximum values of AWF and RYT were reached under N2 treatment. Compared with monoculture, there was a significant difference in the temporal stability of intercropping wheat and faba beans under N1, N2, and N3 treatments. Under N1 and N2 treatments, there was a significant difference in structural stability between intercropped wheat and faba bean. The RII and AWF of wheat were positively correlated with the temporal stability of aboveground biomass in the intercropping system, while the RII of faba bean was negatively correlated with the temporal stability of the intercropping system. In conclusion, intercropping has both competitive and synergistic effects on productivity stability, with the most obvious effect under the N2 treatment.


Key words: nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, intercropping, competition, stability