欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2717-2725.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202508.018

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

南宁市那考河湿地公园下沉式与水平式绿地系统碳密度差异

胡诗怡1,杨钙仁1*,黄子容1,于芳1,邓汶1,李丽莎1,邓羽松1,卢宝鹏2
  

  1. 1广西大学林学院, 广西森林生态与保育重点实验室, 广西高校亚热带人工林培育与利用重点实验室, 南宁 530004; 2广西景鹏科技有限公司, 南宁 530012)

  • 出版日期:2025-08-10 发布日期:2025-08-14

The differences in carbon density between sunken and horizontal green space systems in Nakao River Wetland Park of Nanning City.

HU Shiyi1, YANG Gairen1*, HUANG Zirong1, YU Fang1, DENG Wen1, LI Lisha1, DENG Yusong1, LU Baopeng2   

  1. (1Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory for Cultivation and Utilization of Subtropical Forest Plantation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China; 2Guangxi Jingpeng Technology Co., Ltd., Nanning 530012, China).

  • Online:2025-08-10 Published:2025-08-14

摘要: 下沉式绿地在径流量与水质调控方面具有明显优点并得到广泛应用,但目前对其固碳能力了解不多。以南宁市那考河湿地公园为对象,采用样方调查与室内测试等方法,分析了下沉式(植草沟、雨水花园、净水梯田)与水平式(普通草坪、普通乔灌草复层绿地)城市绿地植被和土壤碳含量与碳储量。结果显示:(1)在乔灌草复层结构绿地中,下沉式绿地植被碳密度显著高于水平式绿地(P<0.05),雨水花园、净水梯田植被碳密度分别为2.42和1.43 kg·m-2,是普通乔灌草复层绿地的2.2和1.3倍;单层结构中,植草沟植被碳密度为0.15 kg·m-2,是普通草坪的1.2倍。(2)雨水花园、净水梯田0~20 cm土层土壤碳密度分别为5.39 和2.15 kg·m-2,是普通乔灌草复层绿地的3.1和1.2倍;植草沟0~20 cm土层碳密度为2.40 kg·m-2,是普通草坪的2.5倍。(3)通过增大汇水面积汇集更多有机物和养分促进植物生长是下沉式绿地碳增汇的主要机制。本研究为深化对下沉式绿地生态系统固碳增汇效果及其机制的认知提供科学依据。


关键词: 碳密度, 生物量, 固碳, 下沉式绿地, 外源径流输入

Abstract: Sunken green spaces offer important advantages for managing runoff and preserving water quality, which are commonly used in urban areas. However, their potential for carbon sequestration is not well understood. We investigated the Nakao River Wetland Park in Nanning, employing plot surveys and laboratory tests to evaluate carbon content and storage in both vegetation and soil of sunken green spaces-including bioswales, rain gardens, and water-purified terraced fields-in contrast to horizontal green spaces, such as traditional lawns and layered tree-shrub-grass environments. The results showed that: (1) In layered tree-shrub-grass configurations, the carbon density in sunken green spaces was higher than that in horizontal green spaces (P<0.05). Specifically, vegetative carbon densities for rain gardens and water-purified terraced fields were 2.42 and 1.43 kg·m-2 respectively, which were 2.2 and 1.3 times greater than those of tree-shrub-grass landscapes. For that with single-layer structure, the carbon density of bioswales was at 0.15 kg·m-2, making it 1.2 times that of conventional lawns. (2) In the 0-20 cm soil layer, carbon densities in rain gardens and water-purified terraced fields reached 5.39 and 2.15 kg·m-2, respectively, being 3.1 and 1.2 times higher than that of tree-shrub-grass landscapes. Bioswales in the 0-20 cm soil layer displayed a carbon density of 2.40 kg·m-2, which was 2.5 times higher than conventional lawns. (3) The main reason for carbon accumulation in sunken green spaces is the increases in plant growth by enhancing organic matter and nutrient accumulation due to larger catchment areas. This study helps improve the understanding of carbon sequestration capabilities and mechanisms within sunken green space ecosystems.


Key words: carbon density, biomass, carbon sequestration, sunken green space, exogenous runoff input