欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 2055-2065.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202506.029

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽宁海洋生态价值核算及可持续发展

李金妮,于晓曼*,刘鸣达,张志斌,宝玉宁,仲弘历   

  1. (沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院, 沈阳 110866)
  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-06-11

Marine ecosystem value accounting and sustainable development in Liaoning Province.

LI Jinni, YU Xiaoman*, LIU Mingda, ZHANG Zhibin, BAO Yuning, ZHONG Hongli   

  1. (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-06-11

摘要: 海洋是海洋生物赖以生存的栖息地,是人类生存发展不可分割的一部分。海洋生态系统的可持续发展是中国可持续发展的重要组成部分,为了解海洋生态系统的可持续性,本文采用能值分析方法从海洋自身价值和对人类的效用两方面,对海洋自然资本存量、海洋生态系统服务功能价值、海洋生态系统可持续发展进行研究,构建一套全方位、多角度、立体交互式的海洋生态系统评价指标体系,并以2018年辽宁省为例,探讨该地区海洋生态系统可持续发展现状。结果表明:(1)辽宁省海洋生态系统自然资本总量为1.30E+25 sej,单位海域自然资本存量为2.03E+14 sej·m-2,其中环境资产存量最大,占自然资本总量的58.63%;能值货币总值为3.67E+12 Em$,单位海域能值货币价值为57.29 Em$·m-2。(2)辽宁省海洋生态系统服务功能能值货币价值为1.42E+10 Em$,是市场总体价格(5.50E+09 $)的2.58倍。(3)对比修正前后(修正后考虑生态经济损失)的可持续发展指标发现:能值产出率(EYR)为107,环境负荷率(ELR)为2.97,可持续发展指数(ESI)为36.10;修正后的能值产出率(EYR′)为38.30,环境负荷率(ELR′)为3.04,可持续发展指数(ESI′)为12.60;EYR′和ESI′偏低,ELR′则偏高,说明海洋生态污染及产业发展对海洋生态系统可持续性会造成显著影响,在海洋产业飞速发展的同时,海洋生态环境问题不容忽视。从优化海洋空间开发格局,提升海洋生态经济发展效益,加强海洋生态系统服务功能保护,关注海洋服务功能的生态价值,促进海洋经济-社会-生态协调发展等角度,提出相关政策建议。


关键词: 生态系统价值核算, 可持续发展, 海洋, 能值分析

Abstract: Sea is the habitat for marine life and an integral part of human survival and development. Marine ecosystem is an important part of China’s sustainable development. To understand the sustainability of marine ecosystems, we adopted emergy analysis from two aspects, marine ecosystem values and its utility to human beings. Concerning natural capital stock, ecosystem service value, resource consumption and environmental pollution, this study built a comprehensive set of marine ecosystem evaluation index system. Marine ecosystem sustainability in Liaoning Province in 2018 was evaluated. The results showed that: (1) The natural capital stock of marine ecosystem was 1.30E+25 sej and emergy value per unit sea area was 2.03E+14 sej·m-2, with environmental assets accounting for the largest proportion (58.63%). The emergy monetary value was 3.67E+12 Em$and emergy monetary value per unit sea area was 57.29 Em$·m-2. (2) The emergy monetary value of marine ecosystem services was 1.42E+10 Em$, which was 2.58 times of the overall market price (5.50E+09 $). (3) Comparing the sustainable development index before and after revision (considering ecological economic loss after revision): emergy yield ratio (EYR) was 107, environmental loading ratio (ELR) was 2.97, emergy sustainability indicator (ESI) was 36.10; revised emergy yield ratio (EYR′) was 38.30, revised environmental loading ratio (ELR′) was 3.04, and revised emergy sustainability indicator (ESI′) was 12.60. The lower EYR′ and ESI′ but higher ELR′ indicated that pollution and industry development played a significant role on marine ecosystem sustainability. With the rapid development of marine industry, the problems of marine ecological environment cannot be ignored. Therefore, the relevant policy suggestions were proposed to promote the sustainable development of marine ecosystem in Liaoning Province, including optimizing the pattern of marine spatial development to comprehensively improving the high-quality development of marine economy, protecting marine ecosystem services, paying great attention to their ecological values, and facilitating the marine coordinated development of economy-society-ecology.


Key words: ecosystem valuation, sustainable development, ocean, emergy analysis